![]()
OEA/Ser.G
CP/doc. 3687/03
29 January 2003
Original: Spanish
REPORT OF THE GENERAL
SECRETARIAT OF THE
ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES ON THE
DIVERSION OF NICARAGUAN ARMS TO THE
UNITED DEFENSE FORCES OF COLOMBIA
January 6, 2003
NOTE:
This edition of the General
Secretariat's Report on the Diversion of Nicaraguan Arms to the United Self Defense
Forces of Colombia does not contain Annexes III through VII. In all other respects this edition is
identical to the complete report.

Report of
the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States on the Diversion
of Nicaraguan Arms to the United Self Defense Forces of Colombia
January 6, 2003
INDEX
1.
Executive Summary
1. Summary
2. Recommendations
2.
Report
I. Background
II. Principal Actors in the Arms Diversion
III. The Chain of Events
IV. Analysis
V. Legal Commentary
VI. Application of the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials, (CIFTA)
VII. Issues Requiring Further Investigation
VIII. Conclusions
3.
Annexes
I. Documented Chronology of the Chain of Events
II. List of all Actors
III. Sworn Statements
IV. Documents Related to the Supposed Purchase Order
V. Supporting Documents
VI. Application of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission's (CICAD) Model Regulations
VII. CICAD Model Regulations
1.
Executive Summary:
I. Summary
In October 1999, a series of events began which resulted in the illegal
diversion of 3000 AK47s and 2.5 million rounds of ammunition from Nicaraguan
government stocks to the Autodefensas
Unidas de Colombia (AUC), a terrorist organization in Colombia. The diversion was made possible by negligent
actions on the part of various government officials and private companies, and
the willful and criminal actions of several private arms merchants.
The original, legitimate, transaction was to be a trade between the
Nicaraguan National Police and a private Guatemalan arms dealership, Grupo de Representaciones Internationales (GIR
S.A.). The Nicaraguan Army introduced
GIR S.A. to the police. GIR S.A.
offered the police a quantity of new Israeli manufactured pistols and mini-uzis
in return for five thousand surplus AK47s and 2.5 million rounds of
ammunition. This was an attractive
arrangement for the police since it was a cashless transaction and would
provide the police with arms more suitable for police work.
GIR S.A. shopped for a buyer
for the police arms and settled on Shimon Yelinek, an Israeli arms merchant
based in Panama. Yelinek claimed to be
representing the Panamanian National Police, and during the negotiations presented
GIR S.A. and Nicaraguan officials with a Panamanian Police purchase order,
which has been proven to be a forgery.
Neither GIR S.A. nor any Nicaraguan official ever questioned the
purchase order or attempted to verify that Panama had in fact offered to buy
the weapons.
Yelinek inspected the police weapons some months after the deal was
made, and after Nicaraguan authorities had given permission for the
transaction. He declared them to be
unserviceable and unsatisfactory. This
threatened the transaction. GIR S.A.
and the Nicaraguan Army solved the problem by arranging a swap of 5000 surplus
police AK47s for 3117 serviceable weapons in the Nicaraguan Army
inventory. GIR S.A. delivered the
Israeli arms to the police and the Nicaraguan Army took over responsibility for
delivering the AK47s. Although the
parameters of the transaction changed, no new authority was requested from
responsible Nicaraguan agencies.
Yelinek identified a Panamanian maritime company, Trafalgar Maritime
Inc., to pick up the arms in Nicaragua and take them to Panama. The arms were transported by the army to the
port of El Rama, Nicaragua, and were loaded aboard the company’s only ship, the
Otterloo, which declared for Panama.
Instead, the Otterloo sailed directly to Turbo, Colombia where the arms
were delivered to the AUC. The Captain
of the ship disappeared shortly thereafter, and the maritime company was
dissolved several months later. The
Otterloo was sold to a Colombian citizen.
Immediately after the shipment left Nicaragua, GIR S.A. began to
organize another sale to Yelinek from the Nicaraguan Army, using the same
purchase order, this time for an additional five thousand AK47s and 17 million
rounds of ammunition. Prices were
exchanged between the three, Yelinek made a down payment, and the deal was
under way.
When the diversion of the initial shipment became known, the
intelligence services of Colombia, Nicaragua and Panama agreed to organize a
“sting” operation, ostensibly to track this second shipment and identify those
responsible for the first diversion. This
plan fell apart fairly quickly when GIR S.A. found out that it was in play and
canceled the shipment.
The OAS investigative team believes that:
1.
Shimon Yelinek
is likely guilty of fraud and of violating Colombian anti-terrorism laws, and
possibly Panamanian anti-terrorism laws, among others. An associate Marco Shrem, appears complicit in these activities, but to an
unknown degree.
2.
The owner of the Otterloo, the ship which
transported the arms to Colombia, is apparently guilty of conspiring with Yelinek
to provide the AUC with arms and of violating Colombian, and possibly
Panamanian, anti-terrorism and other laws.
3.
The captain of
the ship which transported the arms to Colombia, along with his first mate, may
have been cognizant of, and a participant in, the arms diversion organized by
Yelinek.
4.
Although the
Investigative Team found no evidence that Ori Zoller and Uzi Kissilevich, the
owner and general manager of of GIR S.A., respectively, were co-conspirators in
the arms diversion, their failure to make any attempt to verify the actual
destination for the arms contributed to the diversion.
5.
The Government
of Nicaragua failed to comply with a number of provisions of the Inter-American
Convention Against the Illicit Manufacture and Trafficking in Weapons,
Munitions, Explosives and Related Materials (CIFTA), to which it is a
party. Nicaraguan authorities are
guilty of professional negligence with their failure to verify whether the
Panamanian National Police was indeed the true end-user in the arms exchange.
6.
There appears
to be no involvement of Panamanian authorities in the exchange of arms, or
their diversion.
7.
Colombia is the
victim of the arms diversion. However
several Colombian customs agents were likely accomplices of, or were bribed by,
the AUC in order to allow the Otterloo to land its cargo of arms and ammunition
in the port of Turbo.
II. Recommendations:
The OAS Investigative Team presents below a number of recommendations
to strengthen the existing Inter-American arms control regime and prevent
diversions of this type from occurring in the future.
Recommendation 1: The governments of Colombia, Nicaragua, and Panama should vigorously
pursue investigations into possible criminal conduct on the part of any and all
persons involved in this case, and should seek the collaboration of other
governments including Canada,
Guatemala, Israel, Mexico, and the United States of America in the
investigation and prosecution of these possible crimes. These efforts should include attempts to resolve the unanswered questions
presented in section VII of this report.
Recommendation 2: The
Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking
in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and other Related Materials, (CIFTA), is,
and should remain, the primary multilateral hemispheric tool to prevent the
illicit manufacturing and trafficking in arms and ammunition. All member states of the Organization who
have not done so should sign and ratify the Convention. The Consultative Committee of CIFTA should
spearhead an effort to ensure full implementation of the Convention and to
promote its full adoption.
Recommendation 3: With regard to full implementation of the Convention, particular
emphasis should be placed on the
provisions of paragraph 3 of Article IX of the Convention, requiring evidence
of the pre-issuance of the necessary import licenses or authorizations before
any shipments of firearms are released for export. Articles VIII, and X, should also be paid particular
attention. Member states should
consider applying the CICAD Model Regulations to facilitate implementation of
the CIFTA Convention.
Recommendation 4:
OAS member states should consider establishing surplus arms destruction
programs. OAS member and observer
states should provide financial and technical
assistance for such surplus arms destruction.
Recommendation 5:
Persons engaged in the import, export and in-transit movement of
firearms, or as dealers, or carriers and/or shippers of firearms, should be
registered by national governments in order to do business in each country in
which they have an office, and in each
country in which a transaction takes place.
Member states should not engage in business activities with any
non-registered broker.
Recommendation 6:
All member states should review their national legislation and
administrative practices for the exportation of firearms and establish a legal
regime sufficient to exert meaningful control over the inventory and export of
firearms.
Recommendation 7: Harmonized
import certificates should be used by all member countries. Electronic formats
of the certificates should be developed so that the information can be readily
shared with other countries involved in a transaction.[1] Additionally, harmonized export and
in-transit documents should be developed and used by all member states to
regulate the importation, export and transit of arms and ammunition and related
materials.
The OAS Investigative Team limited its work
to the specific mandate it was given.
However the investigation revealed serious issues which the Team
strongly recommends be investigated by governments (see page 34).
2.
Report
of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States on the
Diversion of Nicaraguan Arms to the United Self Defense Forces of Colombia
I.
Background:
A. Request for an Investigation:
On May 8, 2002, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of
Colombia, Nicaragua and Panama, Guillermo Fernandez de Soto, Norman Caldera C.
and José Miguel Alemán, respectively, wrote to OAS Secretary General César
Gaviria. The Ministers requested that
the General Secretariat of the Organization conduct an investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the export of an official shipment of arms and
ammunition which originated in Nicaragua in November 2001, and was subsequently
diverted to the United Self Defense Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, AUC). The letter is contained in Annex V of this report, as document
No. 17, for reference.
The Ministers requested that the Secretary General
investigate the events and report to their respective governments setting out
the facts drawn from the investigation, together with conclusions and
recommendations for suggested mechanisms and procedures designed to prevent the
recurrence of similar situations in the future.
Given the importance of this joint request in the
post-September 11, 2001 environment, the Secretary General responded by
appointing Ambassador Morris D. Busby as his Special Representative to lead the
investigation[2].
B. Investigative Task:
The general task of the investigation was to determine how
an official arms transfer between the Nicaraguan National Police (NNP) and a
firearms brokerage company located in Guatemala, Grupo de Representaciones Internacionales, (GIR S.A.), led to the
diversion of the Nicaraguan arms to the port of Turbo, Colombia, where the arms
subsequently came into the hands of the United Self Defense Forces of Colombia
(Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia,
AUC), a paramilitary group considered a terrorist organization. It had been represented to the responsible
Nicaraguan authorities that the arms were being sold and shipped to the
Panamanian National Police.
The Investigative Team undertook the following specific
tasks:
1.
To determine the
actual facts of the case and prepare a complete chronology of all events
pertinent to the diversion;
2.
To develop
information on possible violations of national law and make appropriate
recommendations to the governments for follow-on investigation and/or action;
3.
To ascertain
whether any of the governments involved failed to adhere to their relevant
international obligations, and;
4.
To make
appropriate recommendations to avoid a recurrence of similar situations in the
future.
C. Methodology:
On May 28 and 29, 2002, the three governments requesting
the investigation each submitted to the General Secretariat a report on their
findings related to the arms diversion.
These reports contained facts of the case developed during their
internal investigations, and also copies of original documentation. Based on an extensive review of this
documentation, the investigating team requested additional information from the
three governments on July 15, 2002, which the governments provided in late
July.
Members of the Investigative Team traveled to Nicaragua,
Guatemala and Panama, to obtain
additional information and documentation, and to interview government officials
and private individuals with direct knowledge of the case.
In Guatemala, the team met with the owner and the general
manager of the firm Grupo de
Representaciones Internacionales, (GIR S.A.), Messrs. Ori Zoller and Uzi
Kissilevich. GIR S.A. was the broker
that put together the deal.
In Nicaragua, the team met with the Foreign Minister, the
Minister of Defense, the current and
former Ministers of Government (Ministro
de Gobernación), the current and former Chiefs of Police, the Contralor General de la República, the
Chief of the Nicaraguan Army, the Inspector General of the army, several other
civilian, police and military officials, and with representatives of the
Nicaraguan shipping company, Agencia Vassali which handled the loading of the
arms onto the Otterloo for ultimate transport to Colombia.
In Panama, the team met with the Foreign Minister; the
Minister of Government and Justice (Ministro
de Gobierno y Justicia); the Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs; the Executive Secretary of the Security Council
(Secretario Ejecutivo del Consejo de
Seguridad); the Chief of the Panamanian National Police; the prosecutor (Fiscal) responsible for the case in
Panama; Marco Shrem, one of two private individuals located in Panama who were
involved in the transaction; Gustavo Padilla, a Panamanian lawyer who
incorporated Trafalgar Maritime Inc.; Yariela Brown, the Secretary of Trafalgar
Maritime Inc.; Carlos Aguilar, the first mate of the ship Otterloo, whose
registered owner is Trafalgar Inc., and other people with knowledge of the
case. The Investigative Team made
several unsuccessful attempts to interview the other private individual located
in Panama who was involved in the arms diversion, Shimon Yelinek. These attempts were made through Yelinek's
lawyers following his arrest by Panamanian authorities in November, 2002. Table 1 (below) contains a complete list of
individuals interviewed or contacted by the Investigative Team.
The Investigative Team did not travel to Colombia, rather,
requests for information from the Government of Colombia were made through that
country’s Ambassador, Permanent Representative to the OAS, Humberto de la Calle
Lombana, and through contacts with knowledgeable individuals.
The Investigative Team was able to reconstruct the facts
surrounding the transfer of arms from Nicaragua to Colombia based on
information provided by the countries, and other information collected during
meetings with government officials and others.
The investigation also sought, and received, information from the
governments of Belize, Guatemala, Israel, Mexico, and the United States of
America.
Table1: Persons Contacted or Interviewed by the
Investigative Team
|
Belize:
Colombia:
United States
of America:
Guatemala:
Israel:
México:
Nicaragua:
Panamá:
|
II. Principal Actors in the Arms Diversion:
The following persons had substantive roles in the arms
transaction:
In Guatemala:
§
Ori
Zoller: An Israeli citizen and owner of GIR S.A., a firearms dealership and
brokerage
agency established in Guatemala in 1996, and a representative of Israeli
Military Industries (IMI). Zoller was formerly a member of the Israeli
Army’s special forces, and an intelligence officer. He was the broker who organized and managed the transfer of the
NNP firearms.
§
Uzi Kissilevich: An Israeli citizen and partner of Zoller’s
in GIR S.A., also formerly a member of
the Israeli military. He serves as GIR
S.A.’s general manager and was also involved in the NNP firearms transfer.
In
Nicaragua:
§
General Roberto
Calderón Meza: Inspector General of the
Nicaraguan Army and formerly its Chief of Logistics. Over the years, General
Calderón allegedly had a number of business dealings with Zoller. Calderón
became involved in the present case through his relationship with Zoller. He was instrumental in providing Nicaraguan
Army firearms to the NNP when the firearms that the NNP was planning to
transfer were found to be unsatisfactory to the ultimate buyer.
§
Major Alvaro
Rivas Castillo: Major of the Nicaraguan
Army, and Aide de Camp of General Calderón.
He took responsibility for logistics and the actual export of the
firearms that are the subject of the investigation.
§
René
Herrera: Nicaraguan Minister of
Government (Gobernación) until
September 30, 2000. Ex-Minister Herrera
approved the terms of the transfer of the NNP firearms to GIR S.A. Herrera also requested Nicaragua’s Comptroller
General (Contraloría General) to exempt this firearms transaction
from Nicaragua’s Law governing State Contracts (Ley de Contrataciones del Estado).
Herrera personally briefed the then United States Ambassador to
Nicaragua on the terms of the original arms deal – describing it as a sale of
antiquated arms to a broker for re-sale to collectors in the United States.
§
Commissioner
Francisco Montealegre: Chief of Police
from September 1996 to September 6, 2001. Montealegre concluded the initial
arms exchange contract with Zoller.
§
Edwin Cordero
Ardilla: Present Chief of the NNP. He became involved in the firearms transfer
following Montealgre’s retirement and saw it through to final completion.
In
Panama :
§
Shimon
Yelinek: Actual purchaser of the
Nicaraguan firearms, through GIR S.A., purportedly for the PNP. He is an Israeli citizen.
§
Marco
Shrem: A business associate of
Yelinek. Shrem put Yelinek in contact
with Zoller, collaborated with Yelinek
in the purchase of the Nicaraguan firearms through Zoller, and attempted to
buy/sell additional arms though Zoller.
He is a Peruvian citizen.
§
Miguel Onattopp
Ferriz: General Manager and owner of Trafalgar Martime Inc., the company
identified as the registered owner of the Otterloo. The Otterloo loaded the arms in El Rama, Nicaragua, and
transported them to Colombia. Miguel
Onattopp Ferriz is a Mexican citizen.
§
Jesús
Iturrios Maciel: Captain of the
Otterloo at the time of the diversion, employed by Trafalgar Maritime Inc. He is a Mexican citizen.
Annex II contains a complete listing of
all of the natural and legal persons and other entities involved in the case.
III. The
Chain of Events:
The chain of events of the case can be broken down into the following
four phases:
§
The first
phase, from October 1999 to June 2000, begins when the Chief of the NNP,
Commissioner Francisco Montealegre, aware that his police force has
insufficient and inappropriate firearms and a lack of financial resources to
acquire new ones, is introduced to Ori Zoller of GIR S.A. by the Inspector
General of Nicaragua’s army, General Roberto Calderón. A proposed arms transfer was conceived
whereby the NNP would provide a quantity of AK47 firearms to the broker Zoller,
and in exchange, Zoller would provide the NNP with more suitable firearms
(pistols and mini-Uzis). During this
stage, the necessary approvals within the Nicaraguan Government were sought and
obtained, and a formal contract to effect the exchange was entered into between
the NNP and Zoller’s GIR S.A.
§
The second
phase occurred between July 2000 and July 2001, when Zoller identified a buyer
for the Nicaraguan arms, Shimon Yelinek and his associates. A shipping company was established in
Panama, Trafalgar Maritime Inc., apparently for the purpose of transporting the
arms to the AUC in Colombia. It was
during this stage that the arms diversion appears to have been planned.
§
During the
third phase, between July 4, 2001 and November 3, 2001, there was a flurry of
activity, beginning when Yelinek inspected the NNP arms being offered for sale
by Zoller and determined that their condition was not adequate for the
transaction to proceed. In an attempt
to salvage the transaction, Zoller and
General Calderón entered into an agreement whereby the Nicaraguan Army offered
to exchange the unacceptable NNP arms for better quality ones in the army’s
possession. This was also the period
when the final logistical arrangements and customs and export procedures were
executed, and culminated with the arms and ammunition being exported from
Nicaragua and diverted to Colombia.
§
The
fourth and final phase took place from late November 2001 to February
2002, when preparations were made to
purchase a second shipment of arms from Nicaragua, again ostensibly for the
Panamanian Police. The intelligence
services of Colombia, Panama, and Nicaragua, through a tri-national operation,
proposed by the Nicaraguan Armny, attempted to put together a “sting”,
supposedly to uncover those responsible for the diversion.
Narrative Summary of the Chain of Events:
The narrative presented below was reconstructed from interviews and
documents obtained by the Investigative Team.
A documented chronology of events is presented in Annex I which provides
additional details regarding the events surrounding the diversion, and the
persons, institutions, and businesses involved.
Phase I:
The
Nicaraguan National Police, a force consisting of approximately 7000 police
officers, has only about half the number of side-arms necessary to equip every
officer. This has forced the police to
issue AK47 assault rifles to many officers, these arms being plentiful as they
were left over from Nicaragua’s civil war.
The Police leadership recognizes that AK47s are not appropriate for a
police force.
In 1999, General Roberto Calderón, the Inspector General of the
Nicaraguan Army, introduced the Chief of the NNP, Commissioner Francisco
Montealegre, to Ori Zoller, the owner of GIR S.A. Zoller and Calderón had a prior business relationship, as GIR
S.A. had sold arms and equipment to the Nicaraguan military in the past. In the fall of 1999, Zoller presented
Montealegre with a proposal to obtain suitable side arms which would not
require the NNP to pay cash for the arms.
Zoller
and Montealegre worked out an exchange, whereby GIR S.A. would provide the NNP
with new side arms (465 Jericho pistols and 100 Uzi-submachineguns) in exchange
for aging surplus police AK47s, ammunition and bayonets (initially, 5000 AK47s,
2.5 million rounds of ammunition, and 6000 bayonets).
Between February and the end of May, 2000, various bureaucratic procedures were undertaken within the Nicaraguan Government to obtain approval for the exchange of arms. The exchange was approved by the Minister of Gobernación, who has responsibility for the NNP; it was also approved by the President of the Republic (as mentioned in a February 3, 2000 letter from the Minister of Gobernación, see document No. 156 in Annex V). An exemption to the state purchases Law, to allow for a “sole source” transaction of the arms, was approved by the Comptroller General on May 22. The Minister of