Federation of American Scientists Case Studies in Dual Use Biological Research Module 8.0: Public Reaction Case Study
Topic: References

References for Implications
(22)
M. Anita Barry, “Report of Pneumonic Tularemia in Three Boston University Researchers: November 2004- March 2005.” Boston Public Health Commission. March 28, 2005. Available: http://www.bphc.org/reports/pdfs/report_202.pdf
 
(23)
Inquiry Leaves Boston Tularemia Mystery Unsolved." Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy News. April 15, 2005.
(24)
 
(25)
Panel Faults NIH Risk Assessment for Boston Biodefense Lab." Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy News. December 5, 2007.
 
(26)
 
(27)
"Technical Input on the National Institutes of Health's Draft Supplementary Risk Assessments and Site Suitability Analyses for the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Boston University: A Letter Report.” The National Research Council of The National Academies. (2007) Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12073
 
(28)
Michelle Cantu, “NIH Establishes Entities to Address Concerns About Boston Biolab,” UPMC Center for Biosecurity. March 14, 2008.
(29)
(30)
Jocelyn Kaiser, “Pathogen Work at Texas A&M Suspended.” ScienceNow, July 2, 2007.
(31)
Lisa Schnirring, “CDC Suspends Work at Texas A&M Biodefense Lab." Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy News. July 3, 2007.
 
(32)
Emily Ramshaw, “Texas A&M Vows to Fix BiodefenseSecuirty Breaches." The Dallas Morning News. September 7, 2007.

Back Next
Topic History Reasons for Public Distrust Implications Discussion References Home