﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Hearing on Whistleblowers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html/comment-page-1#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Those who uncover the corruptions and the wrongdoings of the government should be entitled to protection for reasons stated by Rep. Christopher Shays.  It does come as a shock that this kind of threat may exist to those who are called &quot;whistleblowers&quot;.  If one would have to endure these hardships due to their patriotic duty, and these types of threats are so widely communicated by those within the ranks of government, there should indeed be protections for these individuals.  There is although a major difference between uncovering corruption and unfair exploitation or the assisination of one&#039;s character.  The issue of National Security is obvious and still has and should always have a moral and Democratic sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who uncover the corruptions and the wrongdoings of the government should be entitled to protection for reasons stated by Rep. Christopher Shays.  It does come as a shock that this kind of threat may exist to those who are called &#8220;whistleblowers&#8221;.  If one would have to endure these hardships due to their patriotic duty, and these types of threats are so widely communicated by those within the ranks of government, there should indeed be protections for these individuals.  There is although a major difference between uncovering corruption and unfair exploitation or the assisination of one&#8217;s character.  The issue of National Security is obvious and still has and should always have a moral and Democratic sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html/comment-page-1#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security or Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/02/a_hearing_on_whistleblowers.html#comment-461</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;National security whistleblower hearings&lt;/strong&gt;

Yesterday the House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations held hearings on whether national security whistleblowers have enough protection against retaliation and whether they have sufficient process to be ab...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National security whistleblower hearings</strong></p>
<p>Yesterday the House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations held hearings on whether national security whistleblowers have enough protection against retaliation and whether they have sufficient process to be ab&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

