Comments on: What’s Classified and What’s Not http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/whats_classified_and_whats_not.html Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Allen Thomson http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/02/whats_classified_and_whats_not.html/comment-page-1#comment-477 Allen Thomson Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:24:55 +0000 http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/02/whats_classified_and_whats_not.html#comment-477 > (A minority of classified information, such as nuclear weapons design information, is specified and protected by statute. The remainder, the large majority, is classified by executive order.) > There's a helpful if slightly informal and not entirely complete (e.g., 18 USC 798 isn't mentioned) survey of such matters at <a href="http://www.rbs2.com/OFAC2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.rbs2.com/OFAC2.pdf</a>, that being "U.S. Government Restrictions on Scientific Publications: Statutes and Federal Regulations" by Ronald B. Standler, 13 July 2004. >
(A minority of classified information, such as nuclear weapons design information, is specified and protected by statute. The remainder, the large majority, is classified by executive order.)
>

There’s a helpful if slightly informal and not entirely complete (e.g., 18 USC 798 isn’t mentioned) survey of such matters at http://www.rbs2.com/OFAC2.pdf, that being “U.S. Government Restrictions on Scientific Publications: Statutes and Federal Regulations” by Ronald B. Standler, 13 July 2004.

]]>