﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIPAC Court Denies Amicus Standing to Reporters Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/aipac_court_denies_amicus_stan.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/aipac_court_denies_amicus_stan.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Thomson</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/aipac_court_denies_amicus_stan.html/comment-page-1#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/03/aipac_court_denies_amicus_standing_to_reporters_committee.html#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Note (below) that the accessory before the fact statute, 18 USC 2, is invoked in the indictment against Rosen.
 
Bad, bad, very bad if the gummint wins this one.  
 
Which I think it will if it goes to trial, given the judge, the venue, the appeals courts involved.

See, for background, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2001/09/090401.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2001/09/090401.html&lt;/a&gt;.


 ++++++++++++++
 
http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/aipac022706.pdf

&quot;Rosen is also charged with aiding and abetting a communication of national defense information by one who is authorized to possess such information to a person not entitled to receive it, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 793(d).&quot;
 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note (below) that the accessory before the fact statute, 18 USC 2, is invoked in the indictment against Rosen.</p>
<p>Bad, bad, very bad if the gummint wins this one.  </p>
<p>Which I think it will if it goes to trial, given the judge, the venue, the appeals courts involved.</p>
<p>See, for background, <a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2001/09/090401.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2001/09/090401.html</a>.</p>
<p> ++++++++++++++</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/aipac022706.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/aipac022706.pdf</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Rosen is also charged with aiding and abetting a communication of national defense information by one who is authorized to possess such information to a person not entitled to receive it, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 793(d).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

