﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Origins of &#8220;The Right to Know&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lowenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html/comment-page-1#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lowenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html#comment-491</guid>
		<description>I very much appreciate the plug for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933116021/sr=1-1/qid=1154452266/ref=sr_1_1/103-9252296-8502228?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my book&lt;/a&gt; (now in its 3rd edition) re my comments on the Constitution and the public&#039;s right to know.  Your comments notwithstanding, my statement remains correct as written.  There is no blanket Constitutional &quot;right to know.&quot;  I am not a lawyer but I am hard pressed to see how the Constitutional requirement to publish certain types of information, such as the budget, then translates into a blanket right.

FOIA obviously creates a requirement to publish information.  It also grants limits and restrictions on that requirement for classified information.  Again, I do not see how this translates into a blanket right and we obviously cannot have a circumstance in which a law supersedes the Constitution.  Moreover, not every law is based on &quot;rights.&quot;  Some are administrative in nature, which is how I would characterize FOIA.

Mark Lowenthal  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much appreciate the plug for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933116021/sr=1-1/qid=1154452266/ref=sr_1_1/103-9252296-8502228?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow">my book</a> (now in its 3rd edition) re my comments on the Constitution and the public&#8217;s right to know.  Your comments notwithstanding, my statement remains correct as written.  There is no blanket Constitutional &#8220;right to know.&#8221;  I am not a lawyer but I am hard pressed to see how the Constitutional requirement to publish certain types of information, such as the budget, then translates into a blanket right.</p>
<p>FOIA obviously creates a requirement to publish information.  It also grants limits and restrictions on that requirement for classified information.  Again, I do not see how this translates into a blanket right and we obviously cannot have a circumstance in which a law supersedes the Constitution.  Moreover, not every law is based on &#8220;rights.&#8221;  Some are administrative in nature, which is how I would characterize FOIA.</p>
<p>Mark Lowenthal  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol J. Monical</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html/comment-page-1#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol J. Monical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/03/origins_of_the_right_to_know.html#comment-490</guid>
		<description>To me it is inherent in a representative democratic system that a person has the right to know what the government is doing. 

Otherwise, how can one make any decision, particularly intelligent decisions, about for whom to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it is inherent in a representative democratic system that a person has the right to know what the government is doing. </p>
<p>Otherwise, how can one make any decision, particularly intelligent decisions, about for whom to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

