<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bipartisan Executive Branch Reform Bill Advances in House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_re.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_re.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:23:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 02:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_reform_bill_advances_in_house.html#comment-527</guid>
		<description>They can pass all the laws they&#039;d like to. Not a one of them will mean a thing unless somebody is willing to enforce them. What with the &quot;Oversight? What oversight?&quot; attitude of our current batch of congresfolk, it&#039;s difficult to imagine this making any difference whatsoever even if it does go through.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can pass all the laws they&#8217;d like to. Not a one of them will mean a thing unless somebody is willing to enforce them. What with the &#8220;Oversight? What oversight?&#8221; attitude of our current batch of congresfolk, it&#8217;s difficult to imagine this making any difference whatsoever even if it does go through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wm H</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Wm H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/04/bipartisan_executive_branch_reform_bill_advances_in_house.html#comment-526</guid>
		<description>&gt;Among its various 
&gt;provisions the bill 
&gt;would: end secret meetings between lobbyists 
&gt;and most executive branch 
&gt;officials

Oh good grief, we all know there are no secert meetings going on behind closed door. Next thing, someone will be saying there are evelopes stuffed with cash being passed under the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Among its various<br />
>provisions the bill<br />
>would: end secret meetings between lobbyists<br />
>and most executive branch<br />
>officials</p>
<p>Oh good grief, we all know there are no secert meetings going on behind closed door. Next thing, someone will be saying there are evelopes stuffed with cash being passed under the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
