Comments on: AIPAC Defendants Did Not Seek Classified Document, Court Rules http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/08/aipac_defendants_did_not_seek_.html Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:03:51 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Matt http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/08/aipac_defendants_did_not_seek_.html/comment-page-1#comment-630 Matt Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:25:57 +0000 http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/08/aipac_defendants_did_not_seek_classified_document_court_rules.html#comment-630 I couldn't get the On the Media stream to work. A direct link to the MP3 of the "No Secrets Allowed" segment is available here: <a href="http://audio.wnyc.org/otm/otm081106b.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://audio.wnyc.org/otm/otm081106b.mp3</a> I couldn’t get the On the Media stream to work. A direct link to the MP3 of the “No Secrets Allowed” segment is available here:

http://audio.wnyc.org/otm/otm081106b.mp3

]]> By: RM Merrill http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/08/aipac_defendants_did_not_seek_.html/comment-page-1#comment-629 RM Merrill Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:46:57 +0000 http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/08/aipac_defendants_did_not_seek_classified_document_court_rules.html#comment-629 Sounds like political double talk to me. I agree that sensitive documents should be classified and if they're not, surrender the requested information. How far we are willing to go until the American people start seeing the light, that light being the complete distortion of our political process and the eventual outlawing of our Constitutional rights. Sounds like political double talk to me. I agree that sensitive documents should be classified and if they’re not, surrender the requested information. How far we are willing to go until the American people start seeing the light, that light being the complete distortion of our political process and the eventual outlawing of our Constitutional rights.

]]>