Comments on: Implementing the 9/11 Commission Recommendations, Or Not http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/12/implementing_the_911_commissio.html Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Peter Hollings http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2006/12/implementing_the_911_commissio.html/comment-page-1#comment-682 Peter Hollings Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:28:06 +0000 http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2006/12/implementing_the_911_commission_recommendations_or_not.html#comment-682 It is interesting that people would be engaged in the implementation of recommendations from a study as badly-flawed as the 9/11 Commission Report. It is like believing Bush when he said that Iraq had WMD and even after that is factually discredited, unquestioningly accepting his story about 9-11. There are more than enough contradictory facts to warrant taking a second look including: the fact that a number of the supposed hijackers are alive and well, the fact that even the FBI, on its most wanted page for Bin Laden, does not accuse him of complicity in 9-11 due to insufficient evidence, and the fact demonstrated by several physicists and mathmaticians that the WTC Towers could not have collapsed at free-fall speed as they did without the obstruction of the lower floors being removed by controlled demolitions. Why should we busy ourselves implementing recommendations of a study that, by design, never determined root causes? It is interesting that people would be engaged in the implementation of recommendations from a study as badly-flawed as the 9/11 Commission Report. It is like believing Bush when he said that Iraq had WMD and even after that is factually discredited, unquestioningly accepting his story about 9-11. There are more than enough contradictory facts to warrant taking a second look including: the fact that a number of the supposed hijackers are alive and well, the fact that even the FBI, on its most wanted page for Bin Laden, does not accuse him of complicity in 9-11 due to insufficient evidence, and the fact demonstrated by several physicists and mathmaticians that the WTC Towers could not have collapsed at free-fall speed as they did without the obstruction of the lower floors being removed by controlled demolitions.

Why should we busy ourselves implementing recommendations of a study that, by design, never determined root causes?

]]>