<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DoD Adds &#8220;Credibility Assessment&#8221; to Polygraph Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessmen.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessmen.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:03:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessmen.html/comment-page-1#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessment_to_polygraph_program.html#comment-718</guid>
		<description>We should continue to coordinate and enhance our relationship with other disciplines and incorporate their best tools into the practice of truth verification.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should continue to coordinate and enhance our relationship with other disciplines and incorporate their best tools into the practice of truth verification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zz ziled</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessmen.html/comment-page-1#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>zz ziled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/02/dod_adds_credibility_assessment_to_polygraph_program.html#comment-717</guid>
		<description>And so, another faith-based &#039;science&#039; programme gets a major endorsement and taxpayer funding....

I read somewhere that every five years along with each full-lifestyle polygraph report, agencies are now also requiring that some form of &#039;animal entrails&#039; will be read and a full report on that reading will also be submitted. 
I understand that each agency may specify which specific animal&#039;s entrails they want the polygraph examiner to examine. 
I was relieved to read that  due to modern science, no actual animal will actually be harmed in the required  animal entrail readings ---instead readings will now be done by 4-D scans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And so, another faith-based &#8217;science&#8217; programme gets a major endorsement and taxpayer funding&#8230;.</p>
<p>I read somewhere that every five years along with each full-lifestyle polygraph report, agencies are now also requiring that some form of &#8216;animal entrails&#8217; will be read and a full report on that reading will also be submitted.<br />
I understand that each agency may specify which specific animal&#8217;s entrails they want the polygraph examiner to examine.<br />
I was relieved to read that  due to modern science, no actual animal will actually be harmed in the required  animal entrail readings &#8212;instead readings will now be done by 4-D scans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
