<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army Sees Gap in Jurisdiction Over Military Contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_.html/comment-page-1#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 03:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_over_military_contractors.html#comment-762</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying that contractors are under no type of law. So you&#039;re saying that contractors can violate their employee rights and federal laws who protect the right of employees? And contractors who defraud the military on time sheets? can you explain is this what you&#039;re saying contractors are exempt from these violations because I know of 2 companies who are violating employees rights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying that contractors are under no type of law. So you&#8217;re saying that contractors can violate their employee rights and federal laws who protect the right of employees? And contractors who defraud the military on time sheets? can you explain is this what you&#8217;re saying contractors are exempt from these violations because I know of 2 companies who are violating employees rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_.html/comment-page-1#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_over_military_contractors.html#comment-761</guid>
		<description>Does this mean I can&#039;t have a drink inside the Green Zone?  Can I drink at the British Embassy? They have a nice bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean I can&#8217;t have a drink inside the Green Zone?  Can I drink at the British Embassy? They have a nice bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj-on-the-box</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_.html/comment-page-1#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>sj-on-the-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/army_sees_gap_in_jurisdiction_over_military_contractors.html#comment-760</guid>
		<description>Another, in a long line of ethically, morally questionable acts of governance.. onward Christian soldiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another, in a long line of ethically, morally questionable acts of governance.. onward Christian soldiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
