﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Aircraft Recognition (FOUO)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fo.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: USAF</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-29017</link>
		<dc:creator>USAF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fouo.html#comment-29017</guid>
		<description>yes it is classified because of the systems it might carry are classified</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes it is classified because of the systems it might carry are classified</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-8011</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fouo.html#comment-8011</guid>
		<description>is visual aircraft recognition for public relase (public domain) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is visual aircraft recognition for public relase (public domain) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/04/visual_aircraft_recognition_fouo.html#comment-763</guid>
		<description>i was both intrigued and appalled at the restricted access of the army aircraft recognition manual.  that same information is undoubtedly contained in janes&#039; all the world&#039;s aircraft, which has been for decades the definitive unclassified guide to, well, the world&#039;s aircraft.  indeed, in my experience as a (former) marine aviator, janes&#039; had more, and more accurate, data than official gov&#039;t manuals.  this is just another example of the gov&#039;t restricting data that exists in the public domain, and is a latent threat to our democracy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was both intrigued and appalled at the restricted access of the army aircraft recognition manual.  that same information is undoubtedly contained in janes&#8217; all the world&#8217;s aircraft, which has been for decades the definitive unclassified guide to, well, the world&#8217;s aircraft.  indeed, in my experience as a (former) marine aviator, janes&#8217; had more, and more accurate, data than official gov&#8217;t manuals.  this is just another example of the gov&#8217;t restricting data that exists in the public domain, and is a latent threat to our democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

