<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army Documents Posted &#8220;Illegally,&#8221; Army Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:11:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TMKent</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>TMKent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-790</guid>
		<description>To Charles Wilson: The original term was: &quot;...can&#039;t find their ass with both hands BEHIND THEIR BACK.&quot; It&#039;s more poignant that way, isn&#039;t it? :) 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Charles Wilson: The original term was: &#8220;&#8230;can&#8217;t find their ass with both hands BEHIND THEIR BACK.&#8221; It&#8217;s more poignant that way, isn&#8217;t it? <img src='http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 03:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-789</guid>
		<description>The document is not secret and it&#039;s not protected by copyright. If the Army didn&#039;t want it published, they shouldn&#039;t have published it.

The Army is not only wrong, but stupid. No wonder the Iraq War is lost. These people can&#039;t find their ass with both hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The document is not secret and it&#8217;s not protected by copyright. If the Army didn&#8217;t want it published, they shouldn&#8217;t have published it.</p>
<p>The Army is not only wrong, but stupid. No wonder the Iraq War is lost. These people can&#8217;t find their ass with both hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-788</guid>
		<description>from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ioss.gov/WhatDoesFOUOMean.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ioss.gov/WhatDoesFOUOMean.html&lt;/a&gt; -

SO WHAT EXACTLY DOES “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” MEAN?

One of the most commonly encountered questions we get deals with the real meaning of “For Official Use Only” and the implications for storage, transmittal, and disposal. The following information, while not formal policy, will hopefully help steer you straight.

First, off, “FOUO” is primarily a Department of Defense phrase/acronym. Other government departments use it, but many have also come up with their own, similar phrases, to include “Sensitive but Unclassified,” or “Law Enforcement Sensitive,” or just “Official Use Only.” While this discussion only covers FOUO, it hopefully might also answer questions relating to these other, similar markings.

“Unclassified//For Official Use Only” (abbreviated to U//FOUO) is a handling instruction, as opposed to a true classification marking. It is used only for documents or products which contain material which is exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act. That is, U//FOUO cannot be gratuitously placed on any document simply as a means of better controlling the content.

For any document/product correctly bearing the U//FOUO handling instruction, certain safeguards must be taken. Generally speaking, the material should be treated as if it were classified CONFIDENTIAL. This means it cannot be discarded in the open trash, made available to the general public, or posted on an uncontrolled website. It can, however, be shared with individuals with a need to know the content, while still under the control of the individual possessing the document or product. For example, U//FOUO material relating to security precautions during overseas assignments may be shared with family members at home. The material should then be returned to the government office and be properly retained or destroyed. Wherever possible, U//FOUO information should not be passed over unencrypted communications lines (e.g., open phones, non-secure fax, personal e-mails). If no secure communications are available for transmission, U//FOUO material may be sent via unprotected means, with supervisory approval after risk has been assessed.

All IOSS products which are marked U//FOUO should be handled in the manner described above. If you have questions, please send us an e-mail at ioss@radium.ncsc.mil . Defense Department personnel can learn more about FOUO policy by consulting DoD Directive 5400.7-R, “Department of Defense Freedom of Information Act Program,” dated September 4, 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from <a href="http://www.ioss.gov/WhatDoesFOUOMean.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ioss.gov/WhatDoesFOUOMean.html</a> -</p>
<p>SO WHAT EXACTLY DOES “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” MEAN?</p>
<p>One of the most commonly encountered questions we get deals with the real meaning of “For Official Use Only” and the implications for storage, transmittal, and disposal. The following information, while not formal policy, will hopefully help steer you straight.</p>
<p>First, off, “FOUO” is primarily a Department of Defense phrase/acronym. Other government departments use it, but many have also come up with their own, similar phrases, to include “Sensitive but Unclassified,” or “Law Enforcement Sensitive,” or just “Official Use Only.” While this discussion only covers FOUO, it hopefully might also answer questions relating to these other, similar markings.</p>
<p>“Unclassified//For Official Use Only” (abbreviated to U//FOUO) is a handling instruction, as opposed to a true classification marking. It is used only for documents or products which contain material which is exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act. That is, U//FOUO cannot be gratuitously placed on any document simply as a means of better controlling the content.</p>
<p>For any document/product correctly bearing the U//FOUO handling instruction, certain safeguards must be taken. Generally speaking, the material should be treated as if it were classified CONFIDENTIAL. This means it cannot be discarded in the open trash, made available to the general public, or posted on an uncontrolled website. It can, however, be shared with individuals with a need to know the content, while still under the control of the individual possessing the document or product. For example, U//FOUO material relating to security precautions during overseas assignments may be shared with family members at home. The material should then be returned to the government office and be properly retained or destroyed. Wherever possible, U//FOUO information should not be passed over unencrypted communications lines (e.g., open phones, non-secure fax, personal e-mails). If no secure communications are available for transmission, U//FOUO material may be sent via unprotected means, with supervisory approval after risk has been assessed.</p>
<p>All IOSS products which are marked U//FOUO should be handled in the manner described above. If you have questions, please send us an e-mail at <a href="mailto:ioss@radium.ncsc.mil">ioss@radium.ncsc.mil</a> . Defense Department personnel can learn more about FOUO policy by consulting DoD Directive 5400.7-R, “Department of Defense Freedom of Information Act Program,” dated September 4, 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Good for you, Steven!  I&#039;m glad you held firm. &quot;Further action will be taken&quot; is such a vague threat.  &quot;Stop that! Or I&#039;ll, ummm, email you again!&quot;  Hopefully it&#039;s just bureaucratic BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you, Steven!  I&#8217;m glad you held firm. &#8220;Further action will be taken&#8221; is such a vague threat.  &#8220;Stop that! Or I&#8217;ll, ummm, email you again!&#8221;  Hopefully it&#8217;s just bureaucratic BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zetland</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zetland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Well done! Same silly ideas as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cryptome.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cryptome.org&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; ISP revoking service [now up!].

Keep up the pressure for rule of law of/by/for the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! Same silly ideas as <a href="http://www.cryptome.org" rel="nofollow">Cryptome.org&#8217;s</a> ISP revoking service [now up!].</p>
<p>Keep up the pressure for rule of law of/by/for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pzykr</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>pzykr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 20:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Good on ya, Steven!

Good luck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on ya, Steven!</p>
<p>Good luck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-784</guid>
		<description>There is a peculiar new species of bureaucrat that emerged with the advent of the Bush administration: the mid-level political functionary--a kind of soviet-style political officer whose purpose is to strike terror in the rank and file so that they toe the line.  Almost all departments have them.  You find them re-writing technical and scientific reports, determining the bona-fides of juridical appointees, monitoring the doctrinal purity of memos and papers.  They will assume authority over anything that wafts into their aura and the only valid approach is to remind them that there are checks, balances, laws and common sense although the best course of action is to offer them a job with Halliburton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a peculiar new species of bureaucrat that emerged with the advent of the Bush administration: the mid-level political functionary&#8211;a kind of soviet-style political officer whose purpose is to strike terror in the rank and file so that they toe the line.  Almost all departments have them.  You find them re-writing technical and scientific reports, determining the bona-fides of juridical appointees, monitoring the doctrinal purity of memos and papers.  They will assume authority over anything that wafts into their aura and the only valid approach is to remind them that there are checks, balances, laws and common sense although the best course of action is to offer them a job with Halliburton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Conley</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Conley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 07:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Good on you!

Cheryl could also stand to learn how to punctuate a sentence. But I suppose the Army doesn&#039;t care much about grammar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you!</p>
<p>Cheryl could also stand to learn how to punctuate a sentence. But I suppose the Army doesn&#8217;t care much about grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Stinson</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 05:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m so scared!  Are you scared, too?  Ooo, maybe the government will do something... Perhaps we should all just hide our heads in the sand and let the government take care of everything... People don&#039;t actually need to know what&#039;s going on; that&#039;s why we have the government...

Meanwhile... keep at it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m so scared!  Are you scared, too?  Ooo, maybe the government will do something&#8230; Perhaps we should all just hide our heads in the sand and let the government take care of everything&#8230; People don&#8217;t actually need to know what&#8217;s going on; that&#8217;s why we have the government&#8230;</p>
<p>Meanwhile&#8230; keep at it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilPoet</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegall.html/comment-page-1#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilPoet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/army_documents_posted_illegally_army_says.html#comment-781</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand 
with the deepest idealism and love of country.&quot; 
-Robert F. Kennedy&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand<br />
with the deepest idealism and love of country.&#8221;<br />
-Robert F. Kennedy</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
