<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los Alamos Blocks Researcher Access to Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_a.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_a.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Aftergood</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_a.html/comment-page-1#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Aftergood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_access_to_archives.html#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>Later in May 2007, limited researcher access was restored to the LANL archives.  See the linked story in the update above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later in May 2007, limited researcher access was restored to the LANL archives.  See the linked story in the update above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorgon</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_a.html/comment-page-1#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorgon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_access_to_archives.html#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>Now that is weird... I have no problems accessing the archives. Are you sure you have your facts straight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is weird&#8230; I have no problems accessing the archives. Are you sure you have your facts straight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rewinn</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_a.html/comment-page-1#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>rewinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/05/los_alamos_blocks_researcher_access_to_archives.html#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Privatization contracts should include a clause requiring the contractor to accept public access to information.  If the contractor doesn&#039;t like it, the contract can go to someone else. It&#039;s not that complicated ... if we the public demand it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privatization contracts should include a clause requiring the contractor to accept public access to information.  If the contractor doesn&#8217;t like it, the contract can go to someone else. It&#8217;s not that complicated &#8230; if we the public demand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
