Comments on: AIPAC Court Rules on Classification Markings, Juror Bias http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/11/aipac_court_rules_on_classific.html Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Serving Patriot http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/11/aipac_court_rules_on_classific.html/comment-page-1#comment-917 Serving Patriot Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:22:10 +0000 http://fasweb.beacontec.com/blog/secrecy/2007/11/aipac_court_rules_on_classific.html#comment-917 Continuing the Grey Defense with the aid of a cooperative judge. Basic premise of the case is that the material was classified national security information. The ruling is yet another designed to drive the government away from prosecuting this embarrassing and disturbing espionage case. I'm pretty sure if the I in AIPAC stood for Iran; and the defendants were prominent Iranian-Americans, these little legal niceties would not be used. Indeed, one suspects the case would already be litigated and finished (with long sentences handed out). Sigh. SP Continuing the Grey Defense with the aid of a cooperative judge.

Basic premise of the case is that the material was classified national security information. The ruling is yet another designed to drive the government away from prosecuting this embarrassing and disturbing espionage case.

I’m pretty sure if the I in AIPAC stood for Iran; and the defendants were prominent Iranian-Americans, these little legal niceties would not be used. Indeed, one suspects the case would already be litigated and finished (with long sentences handed out).

Sigh.

SP

]]>