<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army Says It Will Restore Public Access to Online Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:51:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Dolley</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/comment-page-1#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Dolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Bet you $5 that not every document in the collection will be restored to public access. And how will we ever know if they&#039;re not? I recommend persisting with your FOIA request even if the Army does restore access, just to ensure that it&#039;s all there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet you $5 that not every document in the collection will be restored to public access. And how will we ever know if they&#8217;re not? I recommend persisting with your FOIA request even if the Army does restore access, just to ensure that it&#8217;s all there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Quentel</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/comment-page-1#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Quentel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>FAS should see about possibly mirroring the documents in case something like this happens again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAS should see about possibly mirroring the documents in case something like this happens again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/comment-page-1#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Next up you can do an FOIA request for all those NGB regs that are not available to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next up you can do an FOIA request for all those NGB regs that are not available to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Army Responds to Request for Unclassified Digital Library &#171; AALL&#8217;s Washington Blawg</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/comment-page-1#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Army Responds to Request for Unclassified Digital Library &#171; AALL&#8217;s Washington Blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>[...] (FAS) and also the recipient of AALL’s 2006 Public Access to Government Information Award, today announced that the U.S. Army has responded favorably to a FOIA request filed last week by the FAS for a copy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (FAS) and also the recipient of AALL’s 2006 Public Access to Government Information Award, today announced that the U.S. Army has responded favorably to a FOIA request filed last week by the FAS for a copy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html/comment-page-1#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/02/army_says_it_will_restore_publ.html#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Steven... and thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Steven&#8230; and thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
