<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Education is Lagging, Business Groups Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/07/science_education.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/07/science_education.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:35:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/07/science_education.html/comment-page-1#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>George Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=1835#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the thing: Bachelor degrees in science, at best, qualify you only as a lab technician. Lab tech work is tedious, repetitive, often does not pay particularly well, and offers little opportunity for promotion. Students are not attracted to it for these reasons, as well as others. And such degrees also do not generally grant any aptitude in critical thinking, since it isn&#039;t taught as a subject.

Now, if one wants more low pay lab technicians as industrial cannon fodder, the recommendation makes perfect sense. However, if one wants a more scientifically informed polity, then the best place to start is in high school, where serious education on basic everyday science is now virtually non-existent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing: Bachelor degrees in science, at best, qualify you only as a lab technician. Lab tech work is tedious, repetitive, often does not pay particularly well, and offers little opportunity for promotion. Students are not attracted to it for these reasons, as well as others. And such degrees also do not generally grant any aptitude in critical thinking, since it isn&#8217;t taught as a subject.</p>
<p>Now, if one wants more low pay lab technicians as industrial cannon fodder, the recommendation makes perfect sense. However, if one wants a more scientifically informed polity, then the best place to start is in high school, where serious education on basic everyday science is now virtually non-existent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhm</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/07/science_education.html/comment-page-1#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>jhm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=1835#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>It would perhaps be beneficial to the state of education in this country if apparently serious public speakers who claimed global climate change, natural selection et cetera were hoaxes, were given the ridicule their positions deserve, not lauded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would perhaps be beneficial to the state of education in this country if apparently serious public speakers who claimed global climate change, natural selection et cetera were hoaxes, were given the ridicule their positions deserve, not lauded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
