<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FRUS Volume on Eastern Europe, 1973-1976, Elicits Dismay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/09/frus_elicits_dismay.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/09/frus_elicits_dismay.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Osgood</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/09/frus_elicits_dismay.html/comment-page-1#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Osgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=1931#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know the source of that turmoil in the Office of the Historian. It&#039;s already a  well established fact that the neo-con ideologues who control the Bush Administration have a penchant for politicizing and filtering everything through their ideology. Why should the Office of the Historian be any different? It seems unlikely to me that they would be interested in the real history of the Cold War and, in particular, the Nixon years, without their filter being applied to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know the source of that turmoil in the Office of the Historian. It&#8217;s already a  well established fact that the neo-con ideologues who control the Bush Administration have a penchant for politicizing and filtering everything through their ideology. Why should the Office of the Historian be any different? It seems unlikely to me that they would be interested in the real history of the Cold War and, in particular, the Nixon years, without their filter being applied to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
