<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligence Policy on Unauthorized Disclosures (2002)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/10/unauthorized_disclosures.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/10/unauthorized_disclosures.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:23:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/10/unauthorized_disclosures.html/comment-page-1#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=1992#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The document notably advises intelligence officials not to prepare a damage assessment of a leak whenever there is a prospect of criminal prosecution against the leaker, implicitly suggesting that an accurate damage assessment might not always favor the prosecution.&lt;/i&gt;
 
Steven,
 
You have drawn the wrong implication. Since disclosure of details of a damage assessment of a leak might well cause additional damage to the national security, the advice is given to prevent further damage through required disclosure of pertinent documents to the defense at trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The document notably advises intelligence officials not to prepare a damage assessment of a leak whenever there is a prospect of criminal prosecution against the leaker, implicitly suggesting that an accurate damage assessment might not always favor the prosecution.</i></p>
<p>Steven,</p>
<p>You have drawn the wrong implication. Since disclosure of details of a damage assessment of a leak might well cause additional damage to the national security, the advice is given to prevent further damage through required disclosure of pertinent documents to the defense at trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
