﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House Web Site Off to a Slow Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/comment-page-1#comment-6109</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2358#comment-6109</guid>
		<description>Lutz-

It wouldn&#039;t matter anyway. Data is data, and documents are documents. Various platforms can easily share and access information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lutz-</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t matter anyway. Data is data, and documents are documents. Various platforms can easily share and access information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/comment-page-1#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2358#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Chris-

You can&#039;t criticize the Obama administrations current website with them having so few days in office. They are not even 2 months in office give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris-</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t criticize the Obama administrations current website with them having so few days in office. They are not even 2 months in office give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hans</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/comment-page-1#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2358#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>Lutz--

as if the Obama transitional team was not aware it was mac-based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lutz&#8211;</p>
<p>as if the Obama transitional team was not aware it was mac-based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lutz</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/comment-page-1#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2358#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>I heard that the incoming adminstration was &quot;mac based&quot; and discovered the White house was &quot;windows based&quot;..
so has new staff converted to Windows or trying to force change to Mac?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that the incoming adminstration was &#8220;mac based&#8221; and discovered the White house was &#8220;windows based&#8221;..<br />
so has new staff converted to Windows or trying to force change to Mac?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/03/a_slow_start.html/comment-page-1#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2358#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>For all the criticism the Bush administration received regarding a lack of transparency, their webpage was miles beyond the current website in a number of categories.  They placed all of their signing statements on the News portion of the website and had a list of &quot;Statements of Administration Policy&quot; linked off the OMB website.  Further, they had a daily transcript of the press briefing, which the current administration only recently got around to doing.

To be honest, I do not know why the current administration needed to take down he whole website and start anew--they could have made stylistic changes to give it that feel of &quot;Change&quot; without having to start from scratch, which is what I suspect is behind their lack of information thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the criticism the Bush administration received regarding a lack of transparency, their webpage was miles beyond the current website in a number of categories.  They placed all of their signing statements on the News portion of the website and had a list of &#8220;Statements of Administration Policy&#8221; linked off the OMB website.  Further, they had a daily transcript of the press briefing, which the current administration only recently got around to doing.</p>
<p>To be honest, I do not know why the current administration needed to take down he whole website and start anew&#8211;they could have made stylistic changes to give it that feel of &#8220;Change&#8221; without having to start from scratch, which is what I suspect is behind their lack of information thus far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

