<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Intelligence Authorization Pending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/2010_intel_auth.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/2010_intel_auth.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Olcott</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/2010_intel_auth.html/comment-page-1#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Olcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2640#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>The reported absence of information on Operation Able Danger in the 9/11 commission report, when the name of the operation now appears in unclassified, though partially redacted, recent federal court documents, and which notes the operation&#039;s having identified four of the later (at least eight months earlier) hijackers.....and why this information was not shared, or if it was, why the previous administration attempted to hide it.....causes me continued on-going concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reported absence of information on Operation Able Danger in the 9/11 commission report, when the name of the operation now appears in unclassified, though partially redacted, recent federal court documents, and which notes the operation&#8217;s having identified four of the later (at least eight months earlier) hijackers&#8230;..and why this information was not shared, or if it was, why the previous administration attempted to hide it&#8230;..causes me continued on-going concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
