﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Declares Nuclear Sites to the IAEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-4302</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-4302</guid>
		<description>I can not believe that this information is still available on this site! In the engineering community FAS has always been a good source of information, but there is limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can not believe that this information is still available on this site! In the engineering community FAS has always been a good source of information, but there is limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wowzer</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Wowzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I can&#039;t believe the people on this comments list.  I deal in my profession with disaster preparedness, and laugh at the hyper-paranoia.  One example is that people in agencies and entities across the US are so afraid of things like cyber-terrorism &quot;what-ifs&quot; that are highly improbable of occurring, that there is almost no preparation for the almost certain disasters of heat waves, flu, tornadoes, hurricanes, ice storms and so forth.  Terrorism is more &quot;sexy.&quot;  

If our lists were easily laid out there for alleged terrorist boogermen  that lurk in every shadow, or better yet mailed directly to them, it wouldn&#039;t make a bit of difference.  It&#039;s not going to make it easier for them.  They are far more likely to get the components and know-how on black market trade.  Even though I have little faith in so called security of all our sites, it&#039;s pretty darn tough to transport this stuff.  

The greater danger is that this stuff lies there in our back yards without us even knowing.  That is much more of a boogerman than an alleged terrorist.  I want to know what I live next door to.  I have a right to know.  I think one of these guys has an FAS email.....way to go!  FAS, Federation of American Scientists is very well-respected.  More stuff can be found on their site, FAS. ORg.  

I am so sick of this bogus terrorism argument.  Terrorism gets a disproportionately large amount of press coverage to keep you cowering in a corner....it&#039;s so good at controlling your minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I can&#8217;t believe the people on this comments list.  I deal in my profession with disaster preparedness, and laugh at the hyper-paranoia.  One example is that people in agencies and entities across the US are so afraid of things like cyber-terrorism &#8220;what-ifs&#8221; that are highly improbable of occurring, that there is almost no preparation for the almost certain disasters of heat waves, flu, tornadoes, hurricanes, ice storms and so forth.  Terrorism is more &#8220;sexy.&#8221;  </p>
<p>If our lists were easily laid out there for alleged terrorist boogermen  that lurk in every shadow, or better yet mailed directly to them, it wouldn&#8217;t make a bit of difference.  It&#8217;s not going to make it easier for them.  They are far more likely to get the components and know-how on black market trade.  Even though I have little faith in so called security of all our sites, it&#8217;s pretty darn tough to transport this stuff.  </p>
<p>The greater danger is that this stuff lies there in our back yards without us even knowing.  That is much more of a boogerman than an alleged terrorist.  I want to know what I live next door to.  I have a right to know.  I think one of these guys has an FAS email&#8230;..way to go!  FAS, Federation of American Scientists is very well-respected.  More stuff can be found on their site, FAS. ORg.  </p>
<p>I am so sick of this bogus terrorism argument.  Terrorism gets a disproportionately large amount of press coverage to keep you cowering in a corner&#8230;.it&#8217;s so good at controlling your minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3870</guid>
		<description>....A U.S. document containing sensitive details about hundreds of civilian nuclear sites across the country was posted online Monday, an apparently inadvertent security breach that had federal officials scrambling yesterday to remedy the mistake. 

(this was not inadvertent nor a mistake - it was intentional and sites like this validate that...nice try by the Washington news to cover it up)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.A U.S. document containing sensitive details about hundreds of civilian nuclear sites across the country was posted online Monday, an apparently inadvertent security breach that had federal officials scrambling yesterday to remedy the mistake. </p>
<p>(this was not inadvertent nor a mistake &#8211; it was intentional and sites like this validate that&#8230;nice try by the Washington news to cover it up)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3869</guid>
		<description>So why was the document removed? Maybe because the White House knows that made a mistake in publishing it - and it only took them one day to figure it out. Meanwhile the document remained here for anyone to download.

The comment by the blog poster that it didn&#039;t contain sensitive data is absurd on its face - as if the locations of all the nuke sites in the U.S. was not sensitive or of extremely high value to any enemy of the U.S.

This is the kind of blind ambivalence and kum-by-ah attitude that will render future generations of the U.S. impotent and liberty-less. First Amendment doesn&#039;t mention anything about making every/all data public nor available to the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why was the document removed? Maybe because the White House knows that made a mistake in publishing it &#8211; and it only took them one day to figure it out. Meanwhile the document remained here for anyone to download.</p>
<p>The comment by the blog poster that it didn&#8217;t contain sensitive data is absurd on its face &#8211; as if the locations of all the nuke sites in the U.S. was not sensitive or of extremely high value to any enemy of the U.S.</p>
<p>This is the kind of blind ambivalence and kum-by-ah attitude that will render future generations of the U.S. impotent and liberty-less. First Amendment doesn&#8217;t mention anything about making every/all data public nor available to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chick Deney</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chick Deney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3799</guid>
		<description>If only the terrorists!!! were interested in good government!!!!!  and in tearing down authoritarianism, lemming attitudes and mindless censorship!!!!!!  then the world would be a better place!!!!

What a shame that most of the people who kick butt and break laws are doing it to support authoritarianism and mindlessness.  Like all the cowboy tinpot terrorists in the US government.  And the commenters!!! deevulging bulging secrets!!!!!

But Steven, on this issue you suck for making Wikileaks do your work for you.  You broke the story, now stick with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only the terrorists!!! were interested in good government!!!!!  and in tearing down authoritarianism, lemming attitudes and mindless censorship!!!!!!  then the world would be a better place!!!!</p>
<p>What a shame that most of the people who kick butt and break laws are doing it to support authoritarianism and mindlessness.  Like all the cowboy tinpot terrorists in the US government.  And the commenters!!! deevulging bulging secrets!!!!!</p>
<p>But Steven, on this issue you suck for making Wikileaks do your work for you.  You broke the story, now stick with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeedyROM</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>SeedyROM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>Thanks for ensuring terrorists will have access to sensitive documents that tell them building design and the location of fission materials.  By knowing the location the terrorists can best plan their attack to break in and go directly to the source location.  Thanks Steven Aftergood for helping the terrorists get the Hope and Change they desire.   Steven Aftergood is a terrorist supporter/extremeist and Steven Aftergood is a weak and pathetic excuse for an American.  I bet he&#039;d post nuke trigger designs if the terrorist supporter could get his filthy hands on them!!!!!!!!!    

Posting sensitive but unclassified docs and pretend that its okay. No its not!!!!  
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/03/AR2009060300028.html?nav=rss_email/components  
Steven Aftergood violated Federal LAW and now that he violated the LAW he must be investigated and considered for prosecution for devulging National Security documents without written permission!!!!!!!!!  Arrest the treasonist, investigate his entire pathetic life and prosecute him for weakening national security and for being King of the AssClowns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for ensuring terrorists will have access to sensitive documents that tell them building design and the location of fission materials.  By knowing the location the terrorists can best plan their attack to break in and go directly to the source location.  Thanks Steven Aftergood for helping the terrorists get the Hope and Change they desire.   Steven Aftergood is a terrorist supporter/extremeist and Steven Aftergood is a weak and pathetic excuse for an American.  I bet he&#8217;d post nuke trigger designs if the terrorist supporter could get his filthy hands on them!!!!!!!!!    </p>
<p>Posting sensitive but unclassified docs and pretend that its okay. No its not!!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/03/AR2009060300028.html?nav=rss_email/components" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/03/AR2009060300028.html?nav=rss_email/components</a><br />
Steven Aftergood violated Federal LAW and now that he violated the LAW he must be investigated and considered for prosecution for devulging National Security documents without written permission!!!!!!!!!  Arrest the treasonist, investigate his entire pathetic life and prosecute him for weakening national security and for being King of the AssClowns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3767</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>Scaremongering and ignorance 1, FAS 0.

As others have pointed out, the information in the document is _not_ classified. In fact, it is explicitly marked &quot;Sensitive But Unclassified,&quot; a post-9/11 creation of the Bush administration that takes otherwise routine information and restricts access to it because it could possibly be useful to someone who wants to do us harm. No secrets here, nothing about nuclear weapons, and anyone thinking otherwise hasn&#039;t been paying attention.

Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Non-Proliferation Policy Education Center and Republican, gave the Washington Times (June 3) the perfect reaction to this tempest in a teapot:

&quot;It is a bit ironic that nobody wanted this information to be made public,&quot; Mr. Sokolski said. &quot;Most of the listed programs are advanced nuclear fuel cycle and reactor initiatives that the Department of Energy sold to the [Capitol] Hill claiming they would vastly reduce the possibility of terrorists being able to divert nuclear bomb material from the commercial nuclear sector. Apparently, some people don&#039;t think they are all that safe. If this is so, it might make sense to shut them down.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scaremongering and ignorance 1, FAS 0.</p>
<p>As others have pointed out, the information in the document is _not_ classified. In fact, it is explicitly marked &#8220;Sensitive But Unclassified,&#8221; a post-9/11 creation of the Bush administration that takes otherwise routine information and restricts access to it because it could possibly be useful to someone who wants to do us harm. No secrets here, nothing about nuclear weapons, and anyone thinking otherwise hasn&#8217;t been paying attention.</p>
<p>Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Non-Proliferation Policy Education Center and Republican, gave the Washington Times (June 3) the perfect reaction to this tempest in a teapot:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is a bit ironic that nobody wanted this information to be made public,&#8221; Mr. Sokolski said. &#8220;Most of the listed programs are advanced nuclear fuel cycle and reactor initiatives that the Department of Energy sold to the [Capitol] Hill claiming they would vastly reduce the possibility of terrorists being able to divert nuclear bomb material from the commercial nuclear sector. Apparently, some people don&#8217;t think they are all that safe. If this is so, it might make sense to shut them down.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>This information goes to the IAEA as part of good will and our obligations to the Additional Protocol that we helped draft. This document only listed facilities; something that can be found easily on the internet within a matter of minutes anyways. You are ignorant if you&#039;re not aware that this the way things are done in the world. If we expect other countries to do the same and create a safe world, we must allow the inspectorate (i.e., the IAEA) to do its job. That&#039;s why Eisenhower called for its creation in 1957 at the UN. Please do some research before you needlessly crucify the FAS and the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This information goes to the IAEA as part of good will and our obligations to the Additional Protocol that we helped draft. This document only listed facilities; something that can be found easily on the internet within a matter of minutes anyways. You are ignorant if you&#8217;re not aware that this the way things are done in the world. If we expect other countries to do the same and create a safe world, we must allow the inspectorate (i.e., the IAEA) to do its job. That&#8217;s why Eisenhower called for its creation in 1957 at the UN. Please do some research before you needlessly crucify the FAS and the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britlin</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>britlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>I find this whole conversation pointless... those in search of this information would have found it in the time span it was available on the GPO. Now that it spread across the internet removing it from the FAS website (1 website out of the entire Internet) will not make it any less difficult to obtain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this whole conversation pointless&#8230; those in search of this information would have found it in the time span it was available on the GPO. Now that it spread across the internet removing it from the FAS website (1 website out of the entire Internet) will not make it any less difficult to obtain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bighnoraj</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/06/nuclear_sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-3759</link>
		<dc:creator>bighnoraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2571#comment-3759</guid>
		<description>dear friends,be cautious henceforth,security and survival of mankind is the need of the hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear friends,be cautious henceforth,security and survival of mankind is the need of the hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

