﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yottabytes and the Data Analysis Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Company - News - Solera Networks&#8482;</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/comment-page-1#comment-5728</link>
		<dc:creator>Company - News - Solera Networks&#8482;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2677#comment-5728</guid>
		<description>[...] Secrecy works to challenge excessive government secrecy and to promote public oversight”) in a post on the challenges of dealing with large data sets. The December 2008 JASON (not an acronym) report  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Secrecy works to challenge excessive government secrecy and to promote public oversight”) in a post on the challenges of dealing with large data sets. The December 2008 JASON (not an acronym) report  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/comment-page-1#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2677#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>You are saying that data including oceans is totally useless.  You are talking about the engine of the world and calling it totally useless.  I think you might be thinking with blinders on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are saying that data including oceans is totally useless.  You are talking about the engine of the world and calling it totally useless.  I think you might be thinking with blinders on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taochiapet</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/comment-page-1#comment-3955</link>
		<dc:creator>taochiapet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2677#comment-3955</guid>
		<description>i think NMvoiceofreason&#039;s point is that we&#039;re already capable of, and indeed do, generate yotta&#039;s worth of image data. the post&#039;s unrealistic use of 1 byte = 1 m^2 (granted, for illustrative purposes) tends to obscure that fact.

rather than an increase in the rate that imaging satellites produce data, perhaps there&#039;s just an increate in the use of imaging satellites to collect data. in that regard, i&#039;d say the only memory being used up is the collective memory of a government limited in power and constrained by law...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think NMvoiceofreason&#8217;s point is that we&#8217;re already capable of, and indeed do, generate yotta&#8217;s worth of image data. the post&#8217;s unrealistic use of 1 byte = 1 m^2 (granted, for illustrative purposes) tends to obscure that fact.</p>
<p>rather than an increase in the rate that imaging satellites produce data, perhaps there&#8217;s just an increate in the use of imaging satellites to collect data. in that regard, i&#8217;d say the only memory being used up is the collective memory of a government limited in power and constrained by law&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Tanner</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/comment-page-1#comment-3953</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2677#comment-3953</guid>
		<description>NMvoiceofreason, (July 7th, 2009 at 8:32 am)

Your twinky analogy is missing something.  I get the resolution we&#039;re working at but that says nothing about the rate that we&#039;re using up memory.  I&#039;m presuming that it&#039;s has something to do with the rate imaging satellites produce data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NMvoiceofreason, (July 7th, 2009 at 8:32 am)</p>
<p>Your twinky analogy is missing something.  I get the resolution we&#8217;re working at but that says nothing about the rate that we&#8217;re using up memory.  I&#8217;m presuming that it&#8217;s has something to do with the rate imaging satellites produce data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMvoiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/07/yottabytes.html/comment-page-1#comment-3952</link>
		<dc:creator>NMvoiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2677#comment-3952</guid>
		<description>If you image the entire earth at 128x128 per meter resolution (roughly 3&quot; squares), then you reach a yottabyte in about a month. 2/3rds of that data is almost totally useless, as it shows the surface of the ocean. If you go multispectral, C/m/y/k/Ir/Uv you can use a yotta per week. If you add lidar and sar, you can do a yotta a day.

Nothing is unmanageable with sufficient time, money, manpower, except for the bureaucracies that gather sensor data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you image the entire earth at 128&#215;128 per meter resolution (roughly 3&#8243; squares), then you reach a yottabyte in about a month. 2/3rds of that data is almost totally useless, as it shows the surface of the ocean. If you go multispectral, C/m/y/k/Ir/Uv you can use a yotta per week. If you add lidar and sar, you can do a yotta a day.</p>
<p>Nothing is unmanageable with sufficient time, money, manpower, except for the bureaucracies that gather sensor data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

