http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/09/draft_exec_order.html Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Thu, 24 May 2012 10:04:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/09/draft_exec_order.html/comment-page-1#comment-5393 Steven Aftergood Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:55:54 +0000 http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2823#comment-5393 Nuclear weapons design information is classified by statute (the Atomic Energy Act), so its classification status would not be affected by the declassification requirements of a new executive order. Nuclear weapons design information is classified by statute (the Atomic Energy Act), so its classification status would not be affected by the declassification requirements of a new executive order.

]]> http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/09/draft_exec_order.html/comment-page-1#comment-5392 ParatrooperJJ Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:38:31 +0000 http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2823#comment-5392 So around 2020 we are going to declassify the secret of the hydrogen bomb? That's brilliant...not! So around 2020 we are going to declassify the secret of the hydrogen bomb? That’s brilliant…not!

]]> http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/09/draft_exec_order.html/comment-page-1#comment-5181 jhm Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:11:29 +0000 http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=2823#comment-5181 75 years maximum? This means that Mickey Mouse's copyright protection is already older than the proposed limit for the most closely held government secrets. 75 years maximum? This means that Mickey Mouse’s copyright protection is already older than the proposed limit for the most closely held government secrets.

]]>