﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classified Outreach to Muslim Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/02/classified_outreach.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/02/classified_outreach.html</link>
	<description>Secrecy News from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Henika</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/02/classified_outreach.html/comment-page-1#comment-6620</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Henika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=3089#comment-6620</guid>
		<description>Steven:

Does this NCTC effort amount essentially to the classification of one component of a global peacebuilding initiative and, thus, a loss of transparency? If so, the complete hypothesis of a global peacebuilding initiative cannot be tested within public purview - right? I mean, we fought a secret war in Afghanistan in the &#039;80s and now we are building peace in secret?

Philip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven:</p>
<p>Does this NCTC effort amount essentially to the classification of one component of a global peacebuilding initiative and, thus, a loss of transparency? If so, the complete hypothesis of a global peacebuilding initiative cannot be tested within public purview &#8211; right? I mean, we fought a secret war in Afghanistan in the &#8217;80s and now we are building peace in secret?</p>
<p>Philip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

