<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog &#187; Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/category/iran/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IAEA Releases New Report on Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Program</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a critical report that concluded while some of the suspected secret nuclear work by Iran may have peaceful purposes, others are specific to building nuclear weapons. The IAEA document reports that the agency has serious concerns about Iran&#8217;s nuclear activities and has obtained credible information that it may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missile Watch &#8211; November 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/12/missile-watch-november-2010.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/12/missile-watch-november-2010.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Schroeder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man-portable Air Defense Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manpads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/12/missile-watch-november-2010.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Fuel Deal with Iran: Getting Back to Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonproliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fuel cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka After a year-long stalemate, Iran and the P5+1 seem to have agreed on a day for holding political talks – December 2. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman confirmed last week that the meeting “will not include discussions on fuel swap” – the deal with France, Russia and United States, also known as the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Fuel Negotiations: Moving Muddled Goalposts</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka and Ivan Oelrich A year ago, France, Russia and the U.S.—called the Vienna Group—proposed a deal in which Iran would ship out some of its worrying low-enriched uranium (LEU) in exchange for fuel for its medical isotope reactor, called the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). These narrow technical discussions about the TRR were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran&#8217;s New Dual Track: A Challenge to Negotiations?</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/irans-new-dual-track-and-prospects-for-a-fuel-swap.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/irans-new-dual-track-and-prospects-for-a-fuel-swap.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonproliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka and Thomas M. Rickers Coaxed by Turkey and Brazil, Iran seems to be actively pursuing fuel talks. France, Russia and the U.S. (also known as the Vienna Group) claim that they, too, are interested in a deal, even as the U.S. and EU passed their own tougher sanctions against the Islamic Republic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/irans-new-dual-track-and-prospects-for-a-fuel-swap.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Iran Give Up Twenty Percent Enrichment?</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka In response to sanctions, Iran’s parliament adopted the Nuclear Achievement Protection Bill on July 18. Among other things, the law requires the government to continue 20 percent enrichment and provide fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). Although this aspect of the legislation has largely fallen below the news radar, it raises [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missile Watch &#8211; June 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/06/missile-watch-june-2010.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/06/missile-watch-june-2010.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Schroeder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man-portable Air Defense Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manpads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/06/missile-watch-june-2010.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Beat Us to It.</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich and Ivanka Barzashka Back in October, when Iran put in a request to the IAEA for a new load of fuel for its medical isotope reactor in Tehran, the United States proposed that Iran ship out an equivalent amount of its low enriched uranium (LEU) in exchange. It turns out, purely coincidentally, that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty Percent Solution: Breaking the Iranian Stalemate</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=2942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka and Ivan Oelrich Iran and the rest of the world are stalemated. Obama’s deadline for Tehran to address concerns about its nuclear program passed at the end of 2009, so the White House is moving to harsher sanctions. But the US is having trouble rallying the needed international support because Iranian intentions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Revelation of Fordow+10: What Does It Mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/the-revelation-of-fordow10-what-does-it-mean.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/the-revelation-of-fordow10-what-does-it-mean.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=2879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka According to a recent article by the New York Times, Western intelligence agencies and international inspectors now “suspect that Tehran is preparing to build more [enrichment] sites”. This revelation, according to the newspaper, comes at a “crucial moment in the White House’s attempts to impose tough new sanctions against Iran.” However, these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/the-revelation-of-fordow10-what-does-it-mean.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

