<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog &#187; Ivan Oelrich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/category/ivan_oelrich/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Responding to Senator Bond on New START</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/responding-to-senator-bond-on-new-start.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/responding-to-senator-bond-on-new-start.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Kit Bond, Republican of Missouri, gave a speech in the Senate on the New START treaty.  Eli Lake’s summary is in the Washington Times.  He made accusations of serious shortcomings in the treaty.  I address these points because they appear to be substantive and earnest, unlike some of the hysteria and outright silliness coming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/responding-to-senator-bond-on-new-start.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>START in a Lame Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/start-in-a-lame-duck.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/start-in-a-lame-duck.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate should vote on the New START during the &#8220;lame duck&#8221; session. The New START arms control treaty, negotiated between the United States and Russia and signed by the presidents of both countries last April, is awaiting ratification by the United States Senate.   Objections to the treaty rest primarily upon misunderstandings or misrepresentation.  In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/start-in-a-lame-duck.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Fuel Negotiations: Moving Muddled Goalposts</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka and Ivan Oelrich A year ago, France, Russia and the U.S.—called the Vienna Group—proposed a deal in which Iran would ship out some of its worrying low-enriched uranium (LEU) in exchange for fuel for its medical isotope reactor, called the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). These narrow technical discussions about the TRR were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/iran-fuel-negotiations-restarting-moving-muddled-goalposts.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nonsense about New START and ICBMs</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/nonsense-about-new-start-and-icbms.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/nonsense-about-new-start-and-icbms.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of what appears to have been a computer glitch, a group of nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) was temporarily off-line last week and not ready to launch on a moment’s notice. According to an article in The Atlantic, some Republicans have suggested that this means that New START, the nuclear arms control treaty awaiting Senate ratification, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/10/nonsense-about-new-start-and-icbms.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New START and Missile Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/new-start-and-missile-defense.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/new-start-and-missile-defense.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not written here on the New START treaty, in part because everything that can be said has been said, well, almost everything…see below.  The treaty is in no way revolutionary.  I don’t think Reagan would bat an eyelash at it.  Yet, while there is widespread bipartisan support for the treaty, including almost all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/new-start-and-missile-defense.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Iran Give Up Twenty Percent Enrichment?</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka In response to sanctions, Iran’s parliament adopted the Nuclear Achievement Protection Bill on July 18. Among other things, the law requires the government to continue 20 percent enrichment and provide fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). Although this aspect of the legislation has largely fallen below the news radar, it raises [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/07/will-iran-give-up-twenty-percent-enrichment.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Beat Us to It.</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich and Ivanka Barzashka Back in October, when Iran put in a request to the IAEA for a new load of fuel for its medical isotope reactor in Tehran, the United States proposed that Iran ship out an equivalent amount of its low enriched uranium (LEU) in exchange. It turns out, purely coincidentally, that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/iran-beat-us-to-it.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAS side events at the RevCon</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/fas-side-events-at-the-revcon.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/fas-side-events-at-the-revcon.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paths to Zero]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Alicia Godsberg Yesterday FAS premiered our documentary Paths To Zero at the NPT RevCon.  The screening was a great success and there was a very engaging conversation afterward between the audience and Ivan Oelrich, who was there to promote the film.  As a result of some suggestions, we are hoping to translate the narration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/05/fas-side-events-at-the-revcon.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documentary &#8220;Paths to Zero&#8221; Premiering at the NPT RevCon</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/documentary-paths-to-zero-premiering-at-the-npt-revcon.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/documentary-paths-to-zero-premiering-at-the-npt-revcon.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=3043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by: Alicia Godsberg On Tuesday May 11 FAS will be premiering our documentary, &#8220;Paths to Zero,&#8221; at the United Nations during the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT RevCon).  The screening will be part of FAS&#8217;s official UN Office of Disarmament Affairs side event for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/documentary-paths-to-zero-premiering-at-the-npt-revcon.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty Percent Solution: Breaking the Iranian Stalemate</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=2942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka and Ivan Oelrich Iran and the rest of the world are stalemated. Obama’s deadline for Tehran to address concerns about its nuclear program passed at the end of 2009, so the White House is moving to harsher sanctions. But the US is having trouble rallying the needed international support because Iranian intentions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/04/twenty-percent-solution-say-yes-to-iran.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>



