<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog &#187; plutonium reprocessing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/category/plutonium-reprocessing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>US – Russia 123 Agreement on the Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/06/us-%e2%80%93-russia-123-agreement-on-the-hill.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/06/us-%e2%80%93-russia-123-agreement-on-the-hill.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plutonium reprocessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[123 Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonproliferation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, June 12 the House Foreign Relations Committee met for over three hours and heard testimony from members of the Committee, a representative of the Bush administration, and expert witnesses regarding the pros and cons of supporting the Agreement Between the United States and Russia for Cooperation in the Field of Peaceful Uses of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/06/us-%e2%80%93-russia-123-agreement-on-the-hill.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Nuclear Trade Deal, This Time with Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/another-nuclear-trade-deal-this-time-with-russia.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/another-nuclear-trade-deal-this-time-with-russia.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ivan Oelrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plutonium reprocessing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compared to all the excitement created by the US-Indian nuclear trade deal, the Russian equivalent, submitted last week, created barely a ripple [caution: big file to download]. While FAS strongly opposes the US-Indian nuclear trade agreement, the Russian case is much more complex. 
There are reasons to oppose the Russian deal and reasons to support [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/another-nuclear-trade-deal-this-time-with-russia.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
