<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cirincione: Obama’s Turn on Nuclear Weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/02/cirincione.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/02/cirincione.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Hans M. Kristensen It is worth your time reading Joe Cirincione’s article in Foreign Affairs: Obama’s Turn on Nuclear Weapons. And I’m not just saying this because Joe is president of the Ploughshares Fund, one of my funders. He does a great job in describing the Obama administration&#8217;s ongoing nuclear targeting review and its place in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/02/cirincione.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget Blunder: “No Cuts” in Nuclear Forces</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/budget.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/budget.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new defense budget has &#8220;no cuts&#8221; in nuclear forces. . By Hans M. Kristensen “There are no cuts made in the nuclear force in this budget.” That clear statement was made yesterday by deputy defense secretary Ashton Carter during the Pentagon’s briefing on the defense budget request for Fiscal Year 2013. We’ll have to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/budget.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Army Chief: Nukes Not For Warfighting</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/warfighting.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/warfighting.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gen. V.K. Singh . By Hans M. Kristensen India’s nuclear weapons “are not for warfighting,” the chief of India’s army said Sunday at the Army Day Parade. The weapons have “a strategic capability and that is where it should end,” General V. K. Singh declared. The rejection of nuclear warfighting ideas is a welcoming development [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/warfighting.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Defense Strategy: A New Nuclear Strategy?</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/a-new-defense-strategy.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/a-new-defense-strategy.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Hans M. Kristensen The Obama administration today presented a new defense strategy that it says is needed to realign U.S. military forces and doctrine with the reductions in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as the new fiscal constraints created by the financial crisis. There are few details in the new strategy for how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/01/a-new-defense-strategy.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Releases Full New START Data</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/newstartnumbers.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/newstartnumbers.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration gets a medal for disclosing its New START treaty numbers. . By Hans M. Kristensen [updated 12 Dec 2011 with new bomber information] Anyone familiar with my writings knows that I don’t hand out medals to the nuclear weapon states very often. But the Obama administration deserves one after the U.S. State Department’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/newstartnumbers.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, China Does Not Have 3,000 Nuclear Weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/chinanukes.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/chinanukes.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study from Georgetown University incorrectly suggests that China has 3,000 nuclear weapons.The estimate is off by an order of magnitude. . By Hans M. Kristensen Only the Chinese government knows how many nuclear weapons China has. As in most other nuclear weapon states, the number is a closely held secret. Even so, it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/chinanukes.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IAEA Releases New Report on Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Program</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a critical report that concluded while some of the suspected secret nuclear work by Iran may have peaceful purposes, others are specific to building nuclear weapons. The IAEA document reports that the agency has serious concerns about Iran&#8217;s nuclear activities and has obtained credible information that it may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/iaea-report-iran.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article On Obama Administration Nuclear Targeting Review</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/targetreview.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/targetreview.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New article published in Arms Control Today . By Hans M. Kristensen The latest issue of Arms Control Today includes a new article by Robert Norris and myself about the nuclear targeting review that is currently underway in the Obama administration. In ordering the review, formally known as the Post-NPR Review, President Obama has asked the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/11/targetreview.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of the B53 Era; Continuation of the Spin Era</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/end-of-the-b53-era.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/end-of-the-b53-era.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Colten</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=5021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Katie Colten and Hans Kristensen [Modifed] Today, one of the largest weapons in the United States nuclear weapons arsenal, the B53, will be dismantled at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. Developed during the Cold War and deployed in 1962, this bomb weighs as much as a minivan and has an explosive yield of nine megatons, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/end-of-the-b53-era.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New START Data: Modest Reductions and Decreased Transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/newstartdata.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/newstartdata.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans M. Kristensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kristensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New START aggregate numbers have been published by the United States and Russia. . By Hans M. Kristensen The latest New START treaty aggregate numbers of strategic arms, which was quietly released by the State Department earlier last week, shows modest reductions and important changes in U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear forces. Most surprisingly, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/10/newstartdata.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

