<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog &#187; npt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/tag/npt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:57:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Big Picture &#8211; what is really at stake with the START follow-on Treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2009/07/the-big-picture-what-is-really-at-stake-with-the-start-follow-on-treaty.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2009/07/the-big-picture-what-is-really-at-stake-with-the-start-follow-on-treaty.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonproliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[START]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=1525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Alicia Godsberg
There is cause for cautious optimism after Presidents Obama and Medvedev signed their START follow-on Joint Understanding in Moscow last Monday – the goal of completing a legally binding bilateral nuclear disarmament agreement with verification measures is preferable to letting START expire without an agreement or without one that keeps some sort of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2009/07/the-big-picture-what-is-really-at-stake-with-the-start-follow-on-treaty.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPT 40 Years Later and Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/07/npt-40-years-later-and-beyond.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/07/npt-40-years-later-and-beyond.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 1, 1968 the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) was opened for signature, codifying for the first time a legally binding obligation to achieve nuclear disarmament. This year marks the 40th anniversary of this historic arms control treaty, to which every state in the United Nations except three has been a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/07/npt-40-years-later-and-beyond.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
