<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAS Strategic Security Blog &#187; nuclear fuel cycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/tag/nuclear-fuel-cycle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp</link>
	<description>Comments and analyses of important national and international security issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:08:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Fuel Deal with Iran: Getting Back to Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ioelrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Barzashka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonproliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fuel cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ivanka Barzashka After a year-long stalemate, Iran and the P5+1 seem to have agreed on a day for holding political talks – December 2. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman confirmed last week that the meeting “will not include discussions on fuel swap” – the deal with France, Russia and United States, also known as the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/11/new-fuel-deal-with-iran-getting-back-to-basics.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act is Good Policy 30 Years On</title>
		<link>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/nuclear-non-proliferation-act-is-good-policy-30-years-on.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/nuclear-non-proliferation-act-is-good-policy-30-years-on.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Godsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alicia Godsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fuel cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reprocessing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is impossible to entirely separate a civilian nuclear power program from a potential nuclear weapons program. President Bush knows this, which is why he is so concerned about Iran’s nuclear energy program. And this is why our country should not undercut nonproliferation goals by restarting a domestic reprocessing program, now called the Global Nuclear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/05/nuclear-non-proliferation-act-is-good-policy-30-years-on.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>



