UAV Roles in the Objective Architecture |
Background
Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), based on demonstrated capabilities and
emerging user needs, are being developed and refined. The tactical and endurance
UAVs continue to project expanding technical and operational capabilities
for increasing mission applications. In DARO's airborne reconnaissance Objective
Architecture for 2010, UAVs will complement manned and space-based systems
in their support of both combat operations and military operations other
than war.
During the next few years, Pioneer and residual Hunter assets will be progressively replaced by Outrider systems for tactical mission support. In parallel, Predator, followed by a mix of Global Hawk and DarkStar systems, will be used to provide deep-look information for extended periods of time and varying conditions of risk. Thus, both tactical and endurance UAV systems will complement each other in performing a full range of surveillance and reconnaissance functions. They will help commanders at different echelons to (1)know what is on or approaching the battlefield before their forces get there, and (2)employ forces and weapon systems more efficiently as the result of precision targeting and BDA information.
UAV Operations in the Theater of the Future
Key considerations (applying to the graphic overleaf) include the following:
1. Relative UAV area coverage and imaging capabilities vary considerably, according to system performance and payload, mission objectives, and primary user level.
2. Different UAV capabilities respond to different user needs in terms of quantity, quality and timeliness (QQT) of information needed to support each user's "battle." The main distinction is between target-spotting tactical UAVs and area-sweeping HAE UAVs, with Predator able to perform both functions to a degree.
3. UAV reconnaissance products require an advanced C4I infrastructure, comprising collection links (shown), and TCS, HAE CGS and imagery exploitation system (IES) processing facilities and dissemination links (not shown), to reach all users.
4. Two connectivity exceptions are (a)links to JSTARS (or other manned assets), and (b)the projected sensor-to-shooter link from endurance UAVs to strike aircraft, which symbolizes the goal of sending targeting data directly to weapon systems (on land and sea, as well as in the air) thereby using reconnaissance as a means to achieve battlespace dominance.
5. Thus, this UAV "operational laydown" and different threats in a representative theater environment support the need for a UAV family of systems to meet expanding user requirements and to enhance joint force operations.

UAV Objective Operations in the Theater of the Future (image size: 208Kb)
Technologies and Applications |
On 16 January 1996, USD(A&T) Dr. Kaminski first discussed ten primary "enabling technologies and architectural concepts that are needed to build dominant battlefield cycle times...." All are relevant to airborne reconnaissance.
|
Key Enabling Technologies |
|
| 1. Advanced Processing | 2. Automatic Target Processing (ATP) |
| 3. A Common Grid | 4. Distributed and Open Architectures |
| 5. Sequential Application of Off-Board Collectors | 6. Data Compression |
| 7. Very Large, Dynamic, Object-Oriented Data Bases | 8. Data Storage |
| 9. Data Dissemination | 10. Planning Analysis Tools |
Background
Over the past year, DARO has focused its technology budget on those technologies that best support the realization of the airborne reconnaissance Objective Architecture for 2010. The Advanced Technology budget includes investments in maturing, high-payoff technologies that facilitate the timely attainment of the Objective Architecture. Other technologies sponsored by Government and industry are also monitored and funded pending their availability for direct application to reconnaissance platforms and ground stations.
The nine technology transition programs comprising DARO's Advanced Technology plan for FY 1996 (as defined in the Airborne Reconnaissance Technology Program Plan of December 1994) have evolved into ten technology transition focus areas for FY 1997, with additional initiatives supported by the Congress. The transition areas, all of which impact UAVs, are described below.
|
Airborne Reconnaissance Technology Transition Areas |
||
| FY96 | FY97 | Remarks |
| Low-Cost | Reconfigurable Pods | Near-term focus on manned recce; UAV applicat'ns later |
| Integrated Avionics | Integrated Avionics | (See MIAG discussion on page 41) |
| Exigent Target Detection | Exigent Tgt Detection | E.g., MSI, HSI, and FOPEN SAR |
| Precision Geolocation | Precision Geolocation | SIGINT & imagery all-wx precision targeting & mapping |
| SIGINT Technology | SIGINT Upgrades | Modular, incremental JSAF approach |
| Imagery Screening & Analyst Cueing | Screening & Cueing | Reducing wide-area search time for critical targets |
| Auto Target Recognition (ATR) & Correlation | ATR & Correlation | Algorithm development & data correlation |
| Common Data Link (CDL) Advanced Technology | CDL Advanced Tech | Enabler of UAV interoperability |
| High-Data-Rate (HDR) Uplinks & Crosslinks | HDR Links | EHF/Laser alternatives under study |
| Fusion | Goal of multi-sensor fusion to locate hidden targets | |
| Congressional Technology Initiatives (added) | Cong'l Tech Initiatives | EO Framing Sensor; Multifunction Self-Aligned Gate. |
During the Advanced Technology programming process, DARO carefully considers applications and priorities in terms of their ultimate utility to the warfighter. This criterion is applied within each of the four technology categories defined for airborne reconnaissance: platforms, sensors, information processing, and communications. As an example, the sensing/exploitation roadmap on the next page shows how specific sensor and processing technologies are being developed to meet evolving mission needs.

Sensing/Exploitation Roadmap (image size: 26Kb)
Micro-UAVs
In addition to rationalizing, focusing and prioritizing relatively mature technologies, DARO also supports more revolutionary initiatives especially where they show promise of meeting needs that could not otherwise be satisfied by incremental developments.
One example is a new DARPA initiative to develop a micro-UAV. This class is defined as a UAV measuring less than 15cm ( 6inches) in any dimension, yet carrying a miniaturized payload, simple avionics and a communication link sufficient to perform needed missions. Following an MIT Lincoln Laboratory proposal, a November 1995 DARPA workshop explored concepts and technologies to accelerate the development of this UAV type. Many challenges were identified for such small UAVs, from their physics of flight to integration of even simplified functions developing an "airplane on a chip"; however, their six-degree-of-freedom flexibility offers high military potential in constrained operating environments, such as within urban areas or supporting small unit operations. DARPA's project will focus on:
Current Technology Applications
Many more technology initiatives are being pursued via DARO sponsorship or support. The facing table lists relatively mature technologies that will be leveraged across airborne reconnaissance systems. Some may be incorporated into current DARP UAV program baselines (following their transition from ACTD to acquisition status); others may be incorporated within later P3I efforts. Several of these technologies offer potential for new surveillance and reconnaissance missions with relatively small investment. Several also meet emerging requirements for special functions and military operational conditions other than war, thereby providing our forces with contingency capabilities as the new century approaches.
|
Current UAV Technology Applications |
|
Heavy Fuel Engine (HFE)
|
|
Communications Relay Payload (CRP)
|
|
Joint SIGINT Avionics Family (JSAF)
|
|
Laser Designator/Rangefinder (LDRF) Payload
|
|
Mine Countermeasures Payload
|
|
Common Data Link (CDL)
|
|
Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI)
|
|
Downsized Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
|
|
Wideband SAR (Foliage Penetrating [FOPEN] Radar)
|
|
Focal Plane Arrays (FPAs)
|
|
Video Imagery (per DSB Task Force on Improved Applications of Intelligence to the Battlefield, Jul 96)
|
|
Global Positioning System (GPS) Pseudolites
|
|
Automatic Target Recognition (ATR)
|