(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & Title | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | To Complete | Total Program |
| R2145 CRUISE MISSILE DEFENSE | 43,537 | 44,235 | 31,439 | 14,703 | 1,092 | 2,049 | 2,617 | 2,910 | Cont. | Cont. |
| R2266 MOBILE OFFSHORE BASING | 13,934 | 13,668 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27,602 |
| R0834 NAVAL SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | 6,663 | 12,533 | 4,110 | 4,657 | 4,767 | 4,888 | 5,012 | 5,146 | Cont. | Cont. |
| R2282 NAVAL TECHNOLOGY INSERTION PROGRAM | 8,446 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,466 |
| R2314 FLEET ADVANCED DEMONSTRATION | 0 | 0 | 7,771 | 28,734 | 49,509 | 69,200 | 80,787 | 89,912 | Cont | Cont |
| TOTAL | 70,436 | 43,320 | 48,094 | 55,368 | 76,137 | 88,416 | 97,968 | Cont | Cont |
Notes: 1/ Fiscal year 1996 and 1997 funds were executed under PE 0205658N.
2/ Reflects an FY 1996 Congressional plus-up which was executed in PE 0603217N; there is no NTIP funding in FY 1997 in any Navy program element.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program focuses science and technology resources in the areas of Precision Strike and Air Superiority/Defense in support of the Joint chiefs of Staff's (JCS's) top five Joint Warfighting Capabilities and the following Joint Mission Areas (JMAs): Joint Strike, Joint Littoral Warfare, Joint Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance, Nuclear Deterrence and Forward Presence/Deterrence.
(U) Precision Strike integrates surveillance and targeting capabilities developed in the Global Surveillance area with high-speed processing and precision weapons for rapid response against high-value, short-dwell targets over extended ranges. The Navy Tactical Missile System provided a demonstration launch of a Navy variant of the Army Tactical Missile System from a ship in support of the Navy's Surface Fire Support mission.
(U) The Air Superiority and Defense area develops and demonstrates all-weather, day/night engagement capabilities against manned aircraft, cruise missiles (including supersonic sea-skimmers), helicopters and tactical ballistic missiles that will be employing stealth and countermeasures. The Airship Demonstration assesses the potential contribution that airships could make to the airborne component of the ship self defense/cooperative engagement capability, over-the-horizon targeting and surveillance, and other relevant mission areas. Supporting the Nuclear Deterrence and Forward Presence/Deterrence JMAs, the Mobile Offshore Base Project will demonstrate the feasibility of a forward positioned Strike Platform in geographical areas where surrounding non-aligned countries desire to maintain their sovereignty.
(U) Beginning in FY 96, the PE was divided into two projects; Cruise Missile Defense (R2145) and Mobile Offshore Base (R2266). These two projects were both previously funded within project R2145. Beginning in FY 98, this PE will include two additional projects; the Navy Science Assistance Program (R0834) transferred from PE 0205658N, and the Fleet Advanced Technology Demonstration (R2314) a FY 98 new start.
(U) Cruise Missile Defense (CMD): This is a continuation of a program initiated in FY 94. The Cruise Missile Defense Advanced Technology effort includes: 1) an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD), Phase I, which demonstrates that an AEGIS ship (or other surface based missile launch platform) using one or more surrogate airborne sensor partners can provide greatly expanded air defense capabilities leading to a robust capability against overland cruise missiles beyond surface based radar line-of-sight; 2) and a CMD Phase II that accelerates and aligns E-2C AEW aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs toward a fielded CMD capability and balances performance, cost, schedule and risk across multiple technology programs; and initiates advanced missile technology efforts to develop and demonstrate engagement capabilities against next generation overland cruise missiles.
(U) Mobile Offshore Base (MOB): New project starting in FY 96 to develop a MOB concept to provide a means by which a long-term U.S. presence can be maintained. Technology issues associated with both semi-submersible and mono-hull modules connected into platforms between 1000 and 3000 meters in length will be explored. Technical challenges include mobility to get on station, as well as sea keeping and stability to support cargo transfer.
(U) The Naval Science Assistance Program (NSAP): This is a continuation of the project previously funded in PE 0205658N (Naval Science Assistance Program) through FY 1997. Provide on-the-spot technical assistance, insertion, and advice to Joint, Naval, and Marine Corps Commands by assigning and managing 32 Science and Technology (S&T) Advisors worldwide. Develop S&T issues and requirements documents to influence the longer term S&T programs. Develop a cadre of civilian scientists and engineers fluent in operational issues. Identify mature technologies which have the potential for improving readiness and warfighting capabilities and evaluate selected technologies, determined by the Commander in Chiefs (CINCs), in operational environments. Serve as the two way bridge between the operational and S&T communities. Beginning in FY 1998, this PE incorporates the Naval Technology Insertion Program (NTIP) (initiated in FY 1996 in PE 0603217N, Project R2282, by Congressional plus-up) to provide for rapid insertion of mature technologies selected by Fleet CINCs into operational forces in small numbers, for test and evaluation in operational settings.
(U) Fleet Advanced Demonstration: This project demonstrates high-risk/high-payoff technologies that could significantly enhance the warfighting capabilities of the fleet and joint forces and provides the opportunity to identify and move emerging technologies quickly and efficiently from the laboratory to the fleet. Fleet Advanced Demonstrations are selected for a match between technological potential and Naval requirements which are derived from operational issues of concern to the fleet, Joint Mission Area/Support Area assessments, and the S&T Roundtables. Each demonstration is designed to assess the extent to which the advanced technology is feasible, affordable and compatible with operational concepts and projected force structure.
U) The Navy S&T program includes projects that focus on or have attributes that enhance the affordability of warfighting systems.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is budgeted within the ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT Budget Activity because it encompasses design, development, simulation, or experimental testing or prototype hardware to validate technological feasibility and concept of operations and reduce technological risk prior to initiation of a new acquisition program or transition to an ongoing acquisition program.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & Title | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | To Complete | Total Program |
| R2145 CRUISE MISSILE DEFENSE | 43,537 | 44,235 | 31,439 | 14,703 | 1,092 | 2,049 | 2,617 | 2,910 | Cont. | Cont. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This is a continuation of a program initiated in FY 94. The CMD Advanced Technology effort includes: 1) an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD), Phase I, which demonstrates that an AEGIS ship (or other surface based missile launch platform) using one or more surrogate airborne sensor partners can provide greatly expanded air defense capabilities leading to a robust capability against overland cruise missiles beyond surface based radar line-of-sight; 2) and a CMD Phase II that accelerates and aligns E-2C Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs toward a fielded CMD capability and balances performance, cost, schedule and risk across multiple technology programs; and initiates advanced missile technology efforts to develop and demonstrate engagement capabilities against next generation overland cruise missiles.
(U) The Air Superiority and Defense area develops and demonstrates all-weather, day/night engagement capabilities against manned aircraft, cruise missiles (including supersonic sea-skimmers), helicopters and tactical ballistic missiles that will be employing stealth and countermeasures.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($18,629) Phase I of CMD ACTD effort (continued effort from FY 1994 program start in PE 0603792N).
(U) Completed:
- (U) Final captive seeker sea clutter data collection, and Navy SM-2 live missile firings against Over the Horizon (OTH) target drones using data from the Mountain Top sensor suite.
- (U) Army simulated missile firings at OTH target drones using data from the Mountain Top sensor suite.
- (U) Phase I of the CMD ACTD.
- (U) Prepared required reports.
(U) ($24,908) Phase II Activities:
(U) Initiated:
- (U) Design, development, and integration efforts for surveillance platform and advanced missile seeker/fuze.
- (U) Design, development, integration, and planning efforts for the Phase II demonstration to support extended horizon engagement of cruise missiles.
- (U) Design tests for airborne sensors against airborne targets.
- (U) Develop Phase II captive seeker sea/land data collection test plan.
- (U) Expand Makaha Radar Facility (MRF) FY 97 and FY 99 critical experiments/demonstrations (MRF 97 & MRF 99).
- (U) Upgrade weapon control modes, overland performance, and handover.
(U) Completed:
- (U) Upgrade baseline E-2C AEW aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($44,235) CMD Phase II
(U) Initiate:
- (U) MRF 97 critical experiments/demonstration
(U) Continue:
- (U) Test planning for MRF 97 and MRF 99
- (U) Design, development integration and planning efforts for the Phase II demonstration to support extended horizon engagement of cruise missiles.
- (U) Advanced missile seeker and fuze technology development and surveillance upgrades leading toward captive flight testing in FY 1999.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($31,439) CMD Phase II
(U) Continue:
- (U) Test planning for MRF 99
- (U) Design, development integration and planning efforts for the Phase II demonstration to support extended horizon engagement of cruise missiles.
- (U) Advanced missile seeker and fuze technology development and surveillance upgrades leading toward captive flight testing in FY 1999.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($14,703) CMD Phase II
(U) Initiate:
- (U) MRF 99 critical experiments/demonstration.
(U) Continue:
- (U) Test planning for MRF 99
- (U) Design, development integration and planning efforts for the Phase II demonstration to support extended horizon engagement of cruise missiles.
- (U) Advanced missile seeker and fuze technology development and surveillance upgrades leading toward captive flight testing in FY 1999.
(U) Complete:
- (U) MRF 99 critical experiments/demonstration.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 48,525 46,311 31,559 12,334
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -4,988 -2,076 -120 +2,369
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission: 43,537 44,235 31,439 14,703
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustments reflect a Jordanian F-16 financing rescission (-$56); internal DON adjustments
(-$2,500); Inflation reduction (-$560); and SBIR Transfer (-$1,872). FY 1997 adjustments reflect Congressional undistributed reductions (-$2,076). FY 1998 adjustments reflect Naval Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and minor adjustments (-$120). FY 1999 adjustments reflect NWCF and minor adjustments (-$131); and restructure CMD II (+$2,500).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable
(U) Technical: Not applicable
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0601153N (Defense Research Sciences)
(U) PE 0602111N (Air and Surface Weapons Technology)
(U) PE 0602121N (Surface Ship and Submarine HM&E Technology)
(U) PE 0602122N (Aircraft Technology)
(U) PE 0602234N (Materials, Electronics and Computer Technology)
(U) PE 0603006A (C3 Advanced Technology)
(U) PE 0603009A (Tractor Hike)
(U) PE 0603226E (Experimental Evaluation of Innovative Technologies)
(U) PE 0603238F (Air Defense/Precision Strike Technology Demo)
(U) PE 0603245F (Advanced Flight Technology Integration)
(U) PE 0603270N (Advanced Electronic Warfare Technology)
(U) PE 0603401F (Advanced Spacecraft Technology)
(U) PE 0603563N (Ship Concept Advanced Design)
(U) PE 0603601F (Conventional Weapons Technology)
(U) PE 0603726F (C3I Subsystem Integration)
(U) PE 0603746N (Retract Maple)
(U) PE 0603755N (Ship Self Defense/Cooperative Engagement Capability)
(U) PE 0603772A (Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology)
(U) PE 0603794N (C3 Advanced Technology)
(U) PE 0604310N (Arsenal Ship)
(U) PE 0604366N (Standard Missile Improvements)
(U) PE 0604770F (Joint Surveillance/Target Attack Radar Systems (JSTARS)
(U) PE 0604866C (Patriot Risk Reduction Mitigation)
(U) PE 0203801A (Missile/Air Defense Product Improvement Program)
(U) PE 0204152N (E-2 Squadrons)
(U) PE 0207163F (Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM))
(U) PE 0207417F (Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & Title | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | To Complete | Total Program |
| R0834 NAVAL SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | 6,663 | 12,533 | 4,110 | 4,657 | 4,767 | 4,888 | 5,012 | 5,146 | Cont. | Cont. |
Notes: 1/ Fiscal years 1996 and 1997 reflect funding executed in PE 0205658N Project R0834 (Navy Science Assistance Program). FY 1996 also includes a Congressional plus-up for Naval Technology Insertion Program (NTIP) executed in PE 0603217N Project R2282 (Commander-in-Chiefs (CINCs) Technology for Rapid Response). There is no NTIP funding for FY 1997.
2/ FY 1997 includes a Congressional plus-up for Littoral Airborne Sensor/Hyperspectral (LASH) executed in PE
0603238N. There is no LASH funding for FY 1998.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This is a continuation of the project previously funded in PE 0205658N (Naval Science Assistance Program) through FY97. The project provides on-the-spot Science and Technology (S&T) Advisors to Joint, Navy, and Marine Corps operational commands worldwide, solves real problems rapidly and inexpensively by insertion and evaluation of mature technologies in operational environments, and provides S&T issues and requirements documents to influence the longer term S&T programs. The program produces a cadre of civilian scientists and engineers fully conversant in operational issues, a compendium of mature technologies, not yet in the acquisition portfolio, available to Fleet Commanders for early at-sea evaluation and concurrent development of new tactics and concepts of operation. NSAP is the two-way bridge between the warfighter and the technical community.
FY 1998 reflects initiation of a new strategy for the Naval Science Assistance Program (NSAP). Until FY 1997, the approach
was to support a large field team of Science and Technology Advisors assigned to operational commands worldwide. During
FY97, NSAP will transition to a smaller corps of advisors while increasing emphasis on rapid, affordable solutions to real
operational problems. This strategy has been developed with the concurrence of the Chief of Naval Operations and is being
implemented cooperatively with the Navy Fleet Commanders and the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) NSAP (Executed under PE 0205658N/Project R0834 in FY 1996.)
I. (U) ($6,163) 30 Scientists and engineers served as primary S&T Advisors to the 30 operational Joint, Naval, and Marine Corps Commands. Conducted liaison in Research, Development, and Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) and acquisition communities to better inform these communities of readiness shortfalls. Provided management of NSAP Headquarters Operations Center (NSAPOPS) and deployed S&T Advisors worldwide. Managed two engineers in NTIP cell at Commander in Chief U.S. Pacific Fleet (CINCPACFLT).
II. (U) ($299) Provided S&T Assistance to the operational commands as required, completing ten tasks based on unresolved, priority Command Technology Issues (CTIs) identified as operational readiness deficiencies. Working in response to the CINCs and subordinate commands, the following NSAP tasks were completed: Safe Passage, Mine Counter Measures (MCM); Shipboard High-Frequency E-Mail; Bosnia Blue Book of Available Technologies to Support Adriatic and Ground Operations; Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, Operational Plan Support (Persian Gulf); Submarine Launched Mobile Mine Set and Drift; Flex-Hose Service Life Extension; Ziplock Special Warfare Equipment Protection; RAT-TRAP Random Tracking, Real-Time Acoustic Processor; Marine Corps Mobile Command, Control, Communication, Computer, and Intelligence (C4I) System Architecture; and Inverse Beam Former. Bosnia Blue Book contained the following available technologies, two of which were rapidly fielded into the Commander, Sixth Fleet: All Weather MCM; Cold Weather Building Materials; Night Vision - Training; Cold Weather Operations - Training; Combat Identification; Counter Sniper; Tactical Picture; Tactical Surveillance & Reconnaissance; Specific Emitter Identification (SEI) (fielded); Radar Propagation over Terrain (fielded); Balkan language translators; Non-lethal Systems; and Mobile, Portable, Deployable Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I).
III. (U) ($110) Assess effectiveness of NSAP technical products in fulfilling fleet requirements. Developed the NSAP strategic plan for further re-engineering of NSAP and started implementation.
IV. (U) ($91) Continued utilization and began long-range improvement of communications and information transfer. Conceived, designed and initiated transition to Web page the management tool known as the Global Technical Tactical Information Center (GTTIC).
(U) NTIP (Executed in PE 0603217N/Project R2282 in FY 1996.)
V. (U) ($7,416) Inserted ten technologies selected by the Fleet CINCs and the Marine Forces Atlantic/Pacific into operational environments for tactical evaluation. Evaluations to be completed in FY98. Ten technologies inserted are P-3 Electronic Signals Management (ESM) SEI System; Small Ship ESM SEI System; Targeting Avionics System; Littoral Airborne Sensor/Hyperspectral (LASH); Radient Clear MCM System; Chemical Vapor Detector; Fiber Optic Bio-Sensor for Biological Warfare (BW) Agents; Medical Diagnostic Tool; Tactical Collection and Management System; and Radar Propagation over Terrain Model.
VI. (U) ($950) NTIP Cell at CINCPACFLT planned, organized, and coordinated Integrated Product Execution Teams (IPETs) consisting of the fleet operators and the technology developers to conduct product execution, insertion, and evaluation.
VII. (U) ($100) Developed, published, and distributed June 1996 edition of ONR Blue Book, "Technologies for Rapid Response." Document was provided in hard copy, electronic, and CD-ROM form to make it as easy as possible for the various fleet customers to utilize it.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) NSAP (Executed in PE 0205658N/Project R0834 in FY 1997.)
VIII. (U) ($4,333) Supported full complement of 30 scientists and engineers serving as the S&T Advisors to 30 Joint, Navy, and Marine Corps commands, providing the primary interface between operating forces and the technical community. Determine readiness shortfalls amenable to technology solutions within the operational commands for first two quarters of the year. Manage NSAPOPS at Office of Naval Research (ONR), solving identified readiness problems with mature technologies. Provide coordination of operational insertion of these technologies and joint evaluations between the developers and operators. Develop and implement strategy to reduce Advisor team to 14 during third quarter by close coordination with the Navy Fleet and Marine Corps Commanders. Improve process for developing CTIs to focus insertions of on-the-shelf and maturing technologies and to provide requirements documentation to influence longer term development and acquisition programs. Manage technology insertions that solve deficiencies identified by CTIs.
IX. (U) ($200) Produce documentation of overall effectiveness of the program, develop transition mechanisms for these products to advanced development and acquisition programs, and provide fleet customers and stakeholders with metrics to evaluate NSAP effectiveness. Use these metrics to continually improve the processes and quality of NSAP support to the operators and NSAP ability to leverage mature technology to solve CTIs.
X. (U) ($8,000) Littoral Airborne Sensor/Hyperspectral (LASH)(Congressional plus-up executed in PE 0205658N/Project R0834 in FY 1997.)
Conduct systems integration and engineering of sensors and real-time processing components that together provide a littoral airborne sensor/hyperspectral Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) capability aboard Orion P3C aircraft.
Conduct operational tests and evaluations during FY97 in Pacific Fleet on well established and calibrated ranges.
Following Fleet evaluations and requisite systems modifications, provide two additional LASH installations
(Atlantic and European theaters) for evaluations in alternative environments. Provide overall management and
transition direction through an Integrated Product Execution Team (IPET) established with CINCPACFLT.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) NSAP
XI. (U) ($3600) 14 scientists and engineers serve as the S&T Advisors to 14 Joint, Navy, and Marine Corps commands, providing the primary interface between operating forces and the technical community. Determine readiness shortfalls amenable to technology solutions within the operational commands and provide liaison support to subordinate and component commands. Manage NSAP Headquarters Operations Center at ONR, identifying mature technologies to solve CTIs. Provide coordination of operational insertion of these technologies and joint evaluations between the developers and operators.
XII. (U) ($100) Develop and distribute to the CINCs a compendium of maturing technologies for rapid response solutions to immediate readiness issues (ONR Blue Book).
XIII. (U) ($200) Assess effectiveness of NSAP technical products, including ten Blue Book technologies and four Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) products initiated in FY96, coordinating IPETs to ensure transitions of successful products. Develop measures of success and provide as lessons learned to S&T community to ensure rapid evolution and evaluation of full spectrum of S&T programs in operational environments.
XIV. (U) ($210) GTTIC throughout operational commands to provide 24 hour rapid technical assistance and to conduct overall management of technical requirements and readiness issues.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
XV. (U) ($4,657) 14 scientists and engineers serve as S&T Advisors to 14 Joint, Navy, and Marine Corps commands, providing the primary interface between operating forces and the technical community. Determine readiness shortfalls, document them in CTIs, and find solutions from mature and on the shelf technologies where possible. Broker the remaining CTIs with longer term technology programs providing requirements documentation to establish new program directions. Where commercial technologies are appropriate integrate them into technical solutions. Establish transitions for FY96 and FY97 technology insertions now nearing completion of evaluation phases. Manage new technology insertion IPETs for products selected from the ONR Blue Book. Provide fleet customers and other stakeholders metrics for determining of effectiveness of NSAP products and improves processes and quality of products accordingly.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 14,572 5,067 0 0
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -557 +7,466 + 4,110 + 4,657
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission: 15,129 12,533 4,110 4,765
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustments reflect Jordanian F-16 financing rescission (-17); Small Business Innovative Research assessment (-197); and internal DoN adjustments (+771). FY 1997 adjustments reflect Congressional Plus-up for LASH (+8,000); and Congressional undistributed reductions (-534). FY 1998 adjustments reflect realignment from 0205658N (+5,223); Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and minor changes (-1,102) and Inflation reduction (-$11). FY 1999 adjustments reflect realignment from 0205658N (+4,700); NWCF and minor adjustments (-$26) and an Inflation reduction (-17).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & Title | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | To Complete | Total Program |
| R2314 FLEET ADVANCED DEMONSTRATION | 0 | 0 | 7,771 | 28,734 | 49,509 | 69,200 | 80,787 | 89,912 | Cont | Cont |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This new start project demonstrates high-payoff technologies that could significantly enhance the warfighting capabilities of the fleet and joint forces and provides the opportunity to identify and move emerging technologies quickly and efficiently from the laboratory to the fleet. Fleet Advanced Demonstrations (FADs) are selected for a match between technological potential and Naval requirements which are derived from operational issues of concern to the fleet, Joint Mission Area/Support Area assessments, and the Science and Technology Roundtables. Each demonstration is designed to assess the extent to which the advanced technology is feasible, affordable and compatible with operational concepts and projected force structure.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 PLAN: Not applicable.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN: Not applicable.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
I. (U) ($4,286) DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION AFFORDABLE SEEKER (DAMASK): Initiate FAT to demonstrate an image guided bomb concept which includes an image seeker that will provide autonomous three meter precision, through adverse weather, at standoff ranges, and at low cost. Develop imaging template and adapt pattern matching software.
II. (U) ($3,485) ADVANCED SURFACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS: Initiate classified program.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLANS:
III. (U) ($6,014) DAMASK: Continue FAD: Fabricate and bench test seeker; design and build signal processor; demonstrate image template generation and matching technology.
IV. (U) ($4,515) ADVANCED SURFACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS: Continue classified program.
V. (U) ($18,205) Initiate FY 1999-start FADs.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 0 0 0 0
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: 0 0 +7,771 +28,734
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission: 0 0 7,771 28,734
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1998 changes reflect DON S&T Realignment to initiate Fleet ATD project (+$7,940) and Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and minor adjustments (-$149) and Inflation reduction (-$20). FY 1999 adjustments reflect an S&T realignment to continue Fleet ATD project (+$28,939); NWCF and minor adjustments (-$140); and Inflation reduction (-$65).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Dragonfly Unmanned Aerial Vehicle development effort is deferred.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0601153N (Defense Research Sciences)
(U) PE 0602111N (Air and Surface Weapons Technology)
(U) PE 0602121N (Surface Ship and Submarine HM&E Technology)
(U) PE 0602122N (Aircraft Technology)
(U) PE 0602232N (Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Technology)
(U) PE 0602233N (Readiness, Training and Environmental Quality Tech)
(U) PE 0602234N (Materials, Electronics & Computer Technology)
(U) PE 0602314N (Electronic Warfare Surveillance Technology)
(U) PE 0602435N (Oceanographic & Atmospheric Technology)
(U) PE 0602633N (Undersea Warfare Weapon Technology)
D. (U) Schedule Profile: Not applicable.
This page intentionally blank.