(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | FY 2000 ESTIMATE | FY 2001 ESTIMATE | FY 2002 ESTIMATE | FY 2003 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
| R0115** SACLANT Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Research Center | 231 | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- |
| R0149 International Cooperative RDT&E | 1,673 | 1,755 | 1,798 | 2,198 | 2,304 | 2,350 | 2,409 | 2,464 | CONT. | CONT. |
| R1767 Naval War College/Center for Naval Warfare Studies | 1,931 | 1,525 | 1,591 | 1,647 | 1,682 | 1,710 | 1,747 | 1,786 | CONT. | CONT. |
| X2221* Assessment Program | 11,014 | 11,983 | 11,630 | 13,000 | 13,341 | 13,668 | 13,962 | 13,694 | CONT. | CONT. |
| X2222 Naval Modeling and Simulation | 2,651 | 4,409 | 9,286 | 10,066 | 12,568 | 13,480 | 12,822 | 12,981 | CONT. | CONT. |
| TOTAL | 17,500 | 19,672 | 24,305 | 26,911 | 29,895 | 31,208 | 30,940 | 30,925 | CONT. | CONT. |
* Project X1991 (P.E. 0603763N) and Projects R0231, R0905, and X1795 (P.E. 0605853N) were consolidated into new project X2221 in FY 1996.
** Funds transferred to Project R0149 in FY 1996
(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides management and technical support for several national and international projects.
(U) Project R0115 provided for the salary and administrative costs to maintain the U.S. scientific staff assigned to the Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic, Undersea Research Center (SACLANTCEN), La Spezia, Italy. Additionally, R0115 supported collaboration between U.S./SACLANTCEN scientists, the lease/loan of equipment, and the purchase of expendables to support the Centre's scientific program.
(U) Project R0149 provided program management, execution, and support to implement a broad range of cooperative naval research and development (R&D) initiatives with allied and friendly nations. Potential cooperative programs were pursued to fulfill established operational requirements, enhance U.S./allied interoperability and standardization, obtain unique foreign technologies, and reduce U.S. developmental and production costs. Such efforts resulted in:
*(U) Development and negotiation of approximately 25 international RDT&E Memoranda of Understanding with allied and friendly nations.
*(U) Management of over 300 information exchange agreements.
*(U) Participation in armaments cooperation fora including the Conference of NATO Armaments Directors groups (e.g., the NATO Naval Armaments Group), Senior National Representative (SNR) consultation, and the Technical Cooperative Program.
(U) Project R1767 supports the Naval War College (NWC) in formulating and developing strategy and campaign alternatives. Under this project, the NWC provides continuing support to the Chief of Naval Operations Strategic Studies Group, the Center for Naval Warfare Studies, and other CNO, UNIFIED, and Fleet CINC projects in the area of multi-national cooperation and command, control, communications and intelligence.
(U) Project X2221 Funds were consolidated from Project X1991 (P.E. 0603763N) and Projects R0231, R0905, and X1795 (P.E. 0605853N) into this new project in FY 1996. Project X2221 provides analytical and management support for the Planning and Programming process. This project supports the development of annual Joint Mission Area/Support Area/Investment Balance Review/Joint Warfighting Capability assessments which provide the analytical underpinnings and basis for programmatic decisions made by the Navy's top leadership.
(U) Project X2222 provides the overarching policy, coordination and technical support for Naval modeling and simulation. This project responds to Congressional guidance to improve modeling and simulation focus, coordination and oversight. It enhances development and execution of a coordinated Naval M&S program, including distributed simulation tool development, M&S incorporation with C4I systems and embedded training systems, and an orderly process of model Verification, Validation and Accreditation required by current directives.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: These programs are funded under RDT&E Management Support because it supports the operations and installations required for general research and development use.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM |
| R0149 | International Cooperative RDT&E |
| 1,673 | 1,755 | 1,798 | 2,198 | 2,304 | 2,350 | 2,409 | 2,464 | CONT. | CONT. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides program management, execution, and support to implement a broad range of cooperative naval research and development (R&D) initiatives with allied and friendly nations. Potential cooperative programs are pursued to fulfill established operational requirements, enhance U.S./allied interoperability and standardization, obtain unique foreign technologies, and reduce U.S. developmental and production costs. Such efforts result in:
*(U) Development and negotiation of approximately 25 International RDT&E Agreements with allied and friendly nations.
*(U) Execution of over 300 information exchange annexes.
*(U) Participation in armaments cooperation fora including the Conference of NATO Armaments Directors groups (e.g., the NATO Naval Armaments Group), Senior National Representative (SNR) meetings, the Technical Cooperative Program and Scientific Committee National Representatives meetings.
*(U) Continued USN collaboration and participation in joint research initiatives with NATO Supreme Allied Command Atlantic, Undersea Research Centre (SACLANTCEN) in La Spezia, Italy.
*(U) Participation in the Engineering and Scientist Exchange Program (ESEP).
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($100) Supported DoN participation at SNR Conferences with allies for harmonization of requirements and identification of potential collaborative R&D projects.
(U) ($350) Supported DoN participation in U.S./allied data exchange conferences to identify foreign technologies and R&D projects in which the Navy may desire to collaborate as well as on-going efforts to initiate/revise/terminate data exchange annexes (DEAs) to target new technologies and expand, where appropriate, to include exchanges with former Soviet Union (FSU) countries.
(U) ($550) Updated and maintained the DoN data bases for drafting, negotiating, managing and tracking of proposed International Agreements (IAs) for "high leverage/high payoff" R&D technology base cooperative projects with key allies and friendly nations.
(U) ($142) Provided support to the Tri-Service Project Reliance International Programs Subpanel in identifying and pursuing cooperative opportunities with allies in critical technology areas.
(U) ($431) Maintained a level of Navy participation in the ESEP at approximately six scientists/engineers. Continued to conduct post-assignment analysis of scientists/engineers to better target assignments with emerging technologies and programs at foreign research establishments.
(U) ($100) Funded the efforts of Systems Command (SYSCOMs) and laboratories in researching and negotiating international cooperative programs.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($100) Continue to support DoN participation at SNR Conferences with allies for harmonization of requirements and identification of potential collaborative R&D projects.
(U) ($400) Continue to support DoN participation in U.S./allied data exchange conferences to identify foreign technologies and R&D projects in which the Navy may desire to collaborate as well as on-going efforts to initiate/revise/terminate DEAs to target new technologies and expand, where appropriate, to include exchanges with FSU countries.
(U) ($550) Continue to update and maintain the DoN data bases for drafting, negotiating, managing and tracking of proposed IAs for "high leverage/high payoff" R&D technology base cooperative projects with key allies and friendly nations.
(U) ($ 26) Provide support to Acquisition Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) in evaluating international cooperative alternatives in development of DON programs as well as support to OSD Internatinal Cooperative Opportunities Groups (ICOG) regarding DON requirements and initiatives.
(U) ($410) Maintain a level of Navy participation in the ESEP at approximately five scientists/engineers. Continue to conduct post-assignment analysis of scientists/engineers to better target assignments with emerging technologies and programs at foreign research establishments.
(U) ($ 81) Continue to fund the efforts of SYSCOMs and laboratories in researching and negotiating international cooperative programs.
(U) ($167) Continue to fund USN collaboration and participation in joint reseach initiatives with NATO SACLANTCEN in the areas of anti-submarine warfare (ASW), mine countermeasures (MCM), and littoral warfare research.
(U) ($ 21) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research Assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($100) Continue to support DoN participation at SNR Conferences with allies for harmonization of requirements and identification of potential collaborative R&D projects.
(U) ($400) Continue to support DoN participation in U.S./allied data exchange conferences to identify foreign technologies and R&D projects in which the Navy may desire to collaborate as well as on-going efforts to initiate/revise/terminate DEAs to target new technologies and expand, where appropriate, to include exchanges with FSU countries.
(U) ($570) Continue to update and maintain the DoN data bases for drafting, negotiating, managing and tracking of proposed IAs for "high leverage/high payoff" R&D technology base cooperative projects with key allies and friendly nations.
(U) ($ 50) Provide support to Acquisition IPTs in evaluating international cooperative alternatives in development of DON programs as well as support to OSD ICOGs regarding DON requirements and initiatives.
(U) ($411) Maintain a level of Navy participation in the ESEP at approximately six scientists/engineers. Continue to conduct post-assignment analysis of scientists/engineers to better target assignments with emerging technologies and programs at foreign research establishments.
(U) ($100) Continue to fund the efforts of SYSCOMs and laboratories in researching and negotiating international cooperative programs.
(U) ($167) Continue to fund USN collaboration and participation in joint reseach initiatives with NATO SACLANTCEN in the areas of ASW, MCM, and littoral warfare research.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($150) Continue to support DoN participation at SNR Conferences with allies for harmonization of requirements and identification of potential collaborative R&D projects.
(U) ($450) Continue to support DoN participation in U.S./allied data exchange conferences to identify foreign technologies and R&D projects in which the Navy may desire to collaborate as well as on-going efforts to initiate/revise/terminate DEAs to target new technologies and expand, where appropriate, to include exchanges with FSU countries.
(U) ($650) Continue to update and maintain the DoN data bases for drafting, negotiating, managing and tracking of proposed IAs for "high leverage/high payoff" R&D technology base cooperative projects with key allies and friendly nations.
(U) ($121) Provide support to Acquisition IPTs in evaluating international cooperative alternatives in development of DON programs as well as support to OSD ICOGs regarding DON requirements and initiatives.
(U) ($500) Maintain a level of Navy participation in the ESEP at approximately six scientists/engineers. Continue to conduct post-assignment analysis of scientists/engineers to better target assignments with emerging technologies and programs at foreign research establishments.
(U) ($150) Continue to fund the efforts of SYSCOMs and laboratories in researching and negotiating international cooperative programs.
(U) ($177) Continue to fund USN collaboration and participation in joint research initiatives with NATO SACLANTCEN in the areas of ASW, MCM, and littoral warfare research.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) FY 1997 President's Budget: | 1,702 | 1,861 | 1,928 | 2,275 |
| (U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | - 29 | -106 | -130 | -77 |
| (U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission | 1,673 | 1,755 | 1,798 | 2,198 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 funding decrease is due to Jordanian F-16 financing rescission (-2), administrative and personal services rescission (-6), SBIR assessment (-13), and update to reflect actual execution (-8). FY 1997 funding decrease is due to Congressional Undistributed Reductions (-106). FY 1998 funding decrease is due to Repricing of International Programs (-64) and Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and minor adjustments (-66). FY 1999 funding decrease is due to Repricing of International Programs (-59) and NWCF and minor adjustments (-18).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0603790D Nunn Araments Cooperation
(U) PE 0605130D Foreign Cooperative Testing
(U) PE 0603790N NATO Cooperative Research and Development
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM |
| R1767 | Naval War College/Center for Naval Warfare Studies |
| 1,931 | 1,525 | 1,591 | 1,647 | 1,682 | 1,710 | 1,747 | 1,786 | CONT. | CONT. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Naval War College (NWC) research activities serve as a focal point, stimulus, and major source of strategic and campaign thought within the Navy. These efforts generate strategy and campaign alternatives, provide for evaluation through wargaming methodologies, and provide recommendations to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and fleet commanders regarding the formulation and execution of strategy.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($1,275) Conducted strategic studies in response to SECNAV, CNO, UNIFIED, and Fleet CINC taskings in such areas as nuclear proliferation, multi-national cooperation options, U.N. Peacekeeping, Pacific Basin options, SECNAV/CNO POM, force structure and strategic games.
(U) ($ 600) Conducted major wargames culminating in Global' 96.
(U) ($ 56) Provided for selected NWC students to conduct advanced research projects.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 852) Conduct strategic studies in response to SECNAV, CNO, UNIFIED, and Fleet CINC taskings in such areas as expeditionary warfare, Russian naval military-to-military relations, and crisis management.
(U) ($ 615) Conduct major wargames culminating in Global '97.
(U) ($ 58) Provide for selected NWC students to conduct advanced research projects.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($ 904) Conduct strategic studies in response to SECNAV, CNO, UNIFIED, and Fleet CINC taskings in such areas as peacekeeping and peace enforcement, environmental law and freedom of navigation, and direct fleet support.
(U) ($ 627) Conduct major wargames culminating in Global '98
(U) ($ 60) Provide for selected NWC students to conduct advanced research projects.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($ 935) Conduct strategic studies in response to SECNAV, CNO, UNIFIED, and Fleet CINC taskings in such areas as maritime strategy, decision support, and direct fleet support.
(U) ($ 650) Conduct major wargames culminating in Global '99.
(U) ($ 62) Provide for selected NWC students to conduct advanced research projects.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) FY 1997 President's Budget: | 1,961 | 1,628 | 1,648 | 1,666 |
| (U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | -30 | -103 | -57 | -19 |
| (U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission: | 1,931 | 1,525 | 1,591 | 1,647 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustment is due to Jordanian F-16 financing rescission (-4), administrative and personal services rescission (-5), and SBIR assessment (-21). FY 1997 adjustment is due to Congressional Undistributed Reductions (-103). FY 1998 funding decrease is due to NWCF and minor adjustments (-51) and inflation (-6). FY 1999 funding decrease is due to NWCF and minor adjustments (-10) and inflation (-9).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM |
| X2221 | Assessment Program |
| 11,014 | 11,983 | 11,630 | 13,000 | 13,341 | 13,668 | 13,962 | 13,694 | CONT. | CONT. |
Project X1991 (P.E. 0603763N) and Projects R0231, R0905, and X1795 (P.E. 0605853N) were consolidated into project X2221 in FY 1996.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: X2221, Assessment Program consolidates analytical and management support to the Planning and Programming segments of the Navy Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS). This project supports the development of annual Joint Mission Area/Investment Balance Review assessments which provide analytical underpinnings and basis for programmatic decisions made by the Navy's top leadership during the Planning and Programming phases of the PPBS process. This program provides the Navy input to the VCJCS lead Joint Warfighting Capability Assessment process. Assessment program develops tools and analytical methodologies based on standards and technical recommendations as provided by the Naval Modeling and Simulation Program (X2222) and provides technical leadership for the analysis functional area of Naval Modeling and Simulation.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($ 150) Developed, updated and maintained detailed level of Navy Standard scenarios based on Defense Planning Guidance.
(U) ($8,297) Performed Joint Mission Area/Support Area Assessments to support the interactive Investment Balance Review process. Efforts include Joint Strike, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence, Forward Presence, Joint Littoral, Joint SEW/I, and Strategic Sealift/Protection and their integration into the Investment Balance Review. Provided Navy input to JWCA process.
(U) ($1,465) Continued to develop and accredit Joint Mission Area/Support Area tools and improve analytic methodology.
(U) ($1,017) Used the standard simulation and database architecture developed by Naval Modeling & Simulation, rehosted legacy models into the new framework, vastly improving the utility of these tools to the assessment process. Developed new tools that utilized models in the standard simulation and databases architecture. Coordinated/supported Joint Analytical Model Improvement Program (JAMIP).
(U) ($ 85) Continued to research and implement essential fleet enhancements provided by CNO's Tactical Support Group.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 200) Develop, update and maintain detailed level Navy Standard scenarios based on Defense Planning Guidance.
(U) ($8,798) Perform Joint Mission Area/Support Area assessments to support the interactive Investment Balance Review process. Efforts include Joint Strike, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence, Forward Presence, Joint Littoral, Joint SEW/I, and Strategic Sealift/Protection and their Integration into the Investment Balance Review. Provide Navy input to JWCA process.
(U) ($1,569) Continue to develop and accredit Joint Mission Area/Support Area tools and improve analytic methodology.
(U) ($1,188) Using the standard simulation and database architecture developed by Naval Modeling and Simulation rehost legacy models into the new framework, vastly improving the utility of these tools to the assessment process. Develop new tools that utilized models in the standard simulation and database architecture. Coordinate/support Joint Analytical Model Improvement Program (JAMIP).
(U) ($ 228) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($ 189) Develop, update and maintain detailed level Navy Standard scenarios based on Defense Planning Guidance.
(U) ($8,168) Perform Joint Mission Area/Support Area assessments to support the interactive Investment Balance Review process; efforts include Joint Strike, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence, Forward Presence, Joint Littoral, Joint SEW/I, and Strategic Sealift/Protection and their Integration into the Investment Balance Review. Provide Navy input to JWCA process.
(U) ($1,785) Continue to develop and accredit Joint Mission Area/Support Area tools and improve analytic methodology.
(U) ($1,488) Using the standard simulation and database architecture developed by Naval Modeling and Simulation to rehost legacy models into the new framework, vastly improving the utility of these tools to the assessment process. Develop new tools that utilize models in the standard simulation and database architecture. Coordinate/support Joint Analytical Model Improvement Program (JAMIP).
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($ 208) Develop, update and maintain detailed level Navy Standard scenarios based on Defense Planning Guidance.
(U) ($8,960) Perform Joint Mission Area/Support Area assessments to support the interactive Investment Balance Review process; efforts include Joint Strike, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence, Forward Presence, Joint Littoral, Joint SEW/I, and Strategic Sealift/Protection and their Integration into the Investment Balance Review. Provide Navy input to JWCA process.
(U) ($1,978) Continue to develop and accredit Joint Mission Area/Support Area tools and improve analytic methodology.
(U) ($1,854) Using the standard simulation and database architecture developed by Naval Modeling and Simulation to rehost legacy models into the new framework, vastly improving the utility of these tools to the assessment process. Develop new tools that utilize models in the standard simulation and database architecture. Coordinate/support Joint Analytical Model Improvement Program (JAMIP).
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) FY 1997 President's Budget: | 11,179 | 12,717 | 11,819 | 13,136 |
| (U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | -165 | -734 | -189 | -136 |
| (U) FY 1998 President's Budget Submit: | 11,014 | 11,983 | 11,630 | 13,000 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 funding change due to SBIR reduction (-120); Other minor Navy fiscal adjustments (-45). FY 1997 funding change due to Congressional Undistributed General Adjustments (-734). FY 1998 funding change due to NWCF Rate Adjustment (-160); Inflation Adjustment (-29). FY 1999 funding change due to NWCF Rate Adjustment (-88); Inflation Adjustment (-48).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT
NUMBER & TITLE |
FY 1996
ACTUAL |
FY 1997
ESTIMATE |
FY 1998
ESTIMATE |
FY 1999
ESTIMATE |
FY 2000
ESTIMATE |
FY 2001
ESTIMATE |
FY 2002
ESTIMATE |
FY 2003
ESTIMATE |
TO
COMPLETE |
TOTAL
PROGRAM |
| X2222 | Naval Modeling and Simulation |
| 2,651 | 4,409 | 9,286 | 10,066 | 12,568 | 13,480 | 12,822 | 12,981 | CONT. | CONT. |
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: X2222, Naval Modeling and Simulation provides the overarching policy, coordination and technical support for Naval Modeling & Simulation. This project responds to Congressional guidance to improve modeling and simulation focus, coordination and oversight. It coordinates the development and execution of Naval M&S program, including distributed simulation tool development, M&S incorporation with C4I systems and embedded training systems, and an orderly process of model Verification, Validation and Accreditation required by current directives. This effort funds the Naval Modeling and Simulation Technical Support Group. This program leverages, assembles and consolidates program-specific Modeling and Simulation capabilities developed by Program Managers, Naval Warfare Centers, Laboratories, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, and contractors to evolve an integrated, interoperable core M&S capability for Navy. The coordination of Modeling and Simulation that results from this program are of significant benefit to training, acquisition, RDT&E and military operations.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($ 464) Naval participation in the development and implementation of Distributed Interactive Simulation Industry standards and the application of distributed simulation in JTFX, ALSP and I/ITSEC, exercises and demos involving operational, research and development, training, and test and evaluation.
(U) ($ 611) Naval Policy, coordination and technical support. Funded the Naval Modeling & Simulation Technical Support Group, which provided: the Naval Modeling and Simulation Catalog, Master Plan, and Investment Strategy; technical support to PEOs/DRPMs/Program Managers/Warfare Centers/Labs; and Naval technical interface to Industry, Joint, DOD, and other Services activities.
(U) ($ 851) Development of standard simulation and database architecture for Naval Modeling & Simulation. Rehosted legacy models into the framework. Developed new model in the standard simulation and database architecture.
(U) ($ 500) Naval contribution to the Aggregate Level Simulation Protocol development including functional validation and Joint exercise participation. Included improvements to the Naval Wargaming Models to permit appropriate Joint participation.
(U) ($ 371) Development of the Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VVA) process. Implementation of the VVA process on new Naval Modeling & Simulation developments and Navy legacy models.
(U) ($- 146) Reflects an erroneous reduction which was the result of a double posting error for a BTR adjustment.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 550) Naval participation in the development and implementation of Distributed Interactive Simulation Industry standards and the application of distributed simulation to a wide variety of operational, research and development, training, test and evaluation exercises.
(U) ($1,775) Naval Policy, coordination and technical support. Funds the Naval Modeling & Simulation Technical Support Group, which provides: annual updates to the Naval Modeling and Simulation Catalog, Master Plan and Investment Strategy; continuing technical support to PEOs/DRPMs/Program Managers/Warfare Centers/Labs; and continuing Naval technical Interface to Industry, Joint, DOD, and other services activities. Funds Navy M&S War Room continuing focus of independent M&S initiatives into coherent process.
(U) ($ 465) Naval contribution to the Aggregate Level Simulation Protocol development including functional validation and Joint exercise participation. Includes improvements to the Naval Wargaming Models to permit appropriate Joint participation.
(U) (1,190) Continue development of common services, tools and databases. Develop the Synthetic Battlespace, through an evolutionary process, integrating standards, standard models, standard data and connectivity to support all Naval Assessment, Training, Acquisition and Operational communities; continue rehosting of legacy models into the framework and development of new models in the standard simulation and database architecture; provide the necessary planning, coordination and technical expertise; provide comprehensive set of data needed to support M&S; Develop Virtual Repository for standard models and standard data. Plan coordinate and selectively build a contiguous M&S network structure based upon existing and growing DoD and commercial networks. Support development of muti-service common simulation framework and necessary infrastructure and tools.
(U) ($ 365) Continue development of the Verification, Validation and Accreditation( VVA) process. Continue implementation of the VVA process on new Naval Modeling & Simulation development and Navy legacy models.
(U) ($ 64) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Businesss Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($2,364) Naval participation in the development and implementation of Distributed Interactive Simulation Industry standards and the application of distributed simulation to a wide variety of operational, research and development, training, test and evaluation exercises.
(U) ($2,866) Naval Policy, coordination and technical support. Funds the Naval Modeling & Simulation Technical Support Group, which provides: annual updates to the Naval Modeling and Simulation Catalog, Master Plan and Investment Strategy; continuing technical support to PEOs/DRPMs/Program Managers/Warfare Centers/Labs; and continuing Naval technical Interface to Industry, Joint, DOD, and other services activities. Funds Navy M&S War Room continuing focus of independent M&S initiatives into coherent process.
(U) ($3,204) Continue development of common services, tools and databases. Develop the Synthetic Battlespace, through an evolutionary process, integrating standards, standard models, standard data and connectivity to support all Naval Assessment, Training, Acquisition and Operational communities; continue rehosting of legacy models into the framework and development of new models in the standard simulation and database architecture; provide the necessary planning, coordination and technical expertise; provide comprehensive set of data needed to support M&S; Develop Virtual Repository for standard models and standard data. Plan coordinate and selectively build a contiguous M&S network structure based upon existing and growing DoD and commercial networks. Support development of multi-service common simulation framework and necessary infrastructure and tools (Oct 97 thru Sep 98).
(U) ($ 852) Continue development of the Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VVA) process. Continue implementation of the VVA process on new Naval Modeling & Simulation development and Navy legacy models.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($2,444) Naval participation in the development and implementation of Distributed Interactive Simulation Industry standards and the application of distributed simulation to a wide variety of operational, research and development, training, test and evaluation exercises.
(U) ($2,942) Naval Policy, coordination and technical support. Funds the Naval Modeling & Simulation Technical Support Group, which provides: annual updates to the Naval Modeling and Simulation Catalog, Master Plan and Investment Strategy; continuing technical support to PEOs/DRPMs/Program Managers/Warfare Centers/Labs; and continuing Naval technical Interface to Industry, Joint, DOD, and other services activities. Funds Navy M&S War Room continuing focus of independent M&S initiatives into coherent process.
(U) ($3,809) Continue development of common services, tools and databases. Develop the Synthetic Battlespace, through an evolutionary process, integrating standards, standard models, standard data and connectivity to support all Naval Assessment, Training, Acquisition and Operational communities; continue rehosting of legacy models into the framework and development of new models in the standard simulation and database architecture; provide the necessary planning, coordination and technical expertise; provide comprehensive set of data needed to support M&S; Develop Virtual Repository for standard models and standard data. Plan coordinate and selectively build a contiguous M&S network structure based upon existing and growing DoD and commercial networks. Support development of multi-service common simulation framework and necessary infrastructure and tools (Oct 98 thru Sep 99).
(U) ($ 871) Continue development of the Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VVA) process. Continue implementation of the VVA process on new Naval Modeling & Simulation development and Navy legacy models.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | ||
| (U) | FY 1997 President's Budget: | 2,872 | 4,699 | 4,828 | 5,324 |
| (U) | Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: | -221 | -290 | +4,458 | +4,742 |
| (U) | FY 1998 President's Budget Submit: | 2,651 | 4,409 | 9,286 | 10,066 |
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 BTR to fund GFO cost growth (-70); SBIR Transfer (-5); Double posting error (-146). FY 1997 funding change due to Congressional Undistributed General Adjustments (-290). FY 1998 funding change due to increase to fund Navy M&S program (+5,150); NWCF rate adjustment (-164); C4I Program Reduction (-500); Inflation Adjustment (-23); other minor fiscal adjustments (-5). FY 1999 funding change due to increase to fund Navy M&S program (+5,150); NWCF rate adjustment (-65); C4I Program Reduction (-300); Inflation Adjustment (-37); other minor fiscal adjustments (-6).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.