FY98 Program Element Descriptive Summaries / RDDS

0207438F Theater Battle Management (TBM) C4I

COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
Total Program Element (PE) Cost 27,403 32,766 24,013 35,341 24,972 13,141 13,896 14,356 Continuing TBD
3330 Cmd Cntrl Info Process Sys (C2IPS) 5,531 5,469 4,764 22,102 12,333 2,376 2,374 2,477 Continuing TBD
4287 Contingency Theater Automated Planning System (CTAPS) 18,425 23,970 12,886 9,222 8,765 6,847 11,522 11,879 Continuing TBD
4288 Wing C2 System (WCCS) 3,447 3,327 6,363 4,017 3,874 3,918 0 0 0 31,778
Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS) develops force-level and wing-level command, control, and intelligence systems which utilize DoD's Global Command and Control System (GCCS) Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) common operating environment (COE). Acquisition of these systems will allow the execution of TBM planning, intelligence, and operational functions of the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC), including the air tasking order (ATO). Projects included in this program are Command & Control Information Processing System (C2IPS), Contingency Theater Automated Planning System (CTAPS), and Wing Command & Control System (WCCS). Another project, Combat Intelligence System (CIS), is also part of the TBMCS, but RDT&E funds for CIS are programmed under PEs 0604321F, 0207431F, and 0305158F (FY97), and 0207414F (FY98+). The TBMCS program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational Systems Development, and is a Post Milestone III effort.

(U) Acquisition Strategy:

Electronic Systems Center (ESC), Hanscom AFB, MA will manage the overall TBMCS program (CTAPS, WCCS, CIS, and C2IPS). Lockheed-Martin Command and Control Systems (LMCCS) was competitively selected and is performing the TBMCS software integration and - when directed by the government - will develop individual applications consistent with the GCCS DII COE. C2IPS efforts will continue under the current prime contractor, Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), through FY97. C2IPS migration into TBMCS will begin in FY98 using the TBMCS Integration & Development (I&D) contractor LMCCS.

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget 27,844 30,915 14,980 12,411 TBD
(U) Appropriated Value 29,813 34,415
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional Reductions -1,034 -827
b. Small Business Innovative Research -634 -822
c. Rescissions -742
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB +9,033 +22,930
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget 27,403 32,766 24,013 35,341 TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96: Appropriated Value includes a Congressional "increase of $5,000,000 [over FY96 PB request of $24,813 thousand] only for ... the capability to generate and automatically disseminate Air Tasking Orders." Rescissions for Bosnia/Jordanian F-16s ($718 thousand total) and Administrative/Personnel ($24 thousand).

FY97: Appropriated Value includes $3,500,000 increase "to support a 1998 completion date of version 1.0 of the TBMCS."

FY98: Funds added to C2IPS program and TBM fund realignment.

FY99: Funds added to integrate Combat Integration Capability into TBMCS; incorporate the new ATO format into C2IPS and WCCS; begin migrating C2IPS into TBMCS.

Schedule: See Individual Projects.

Technical: See Individual Projects.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003
To

Compl

Total

Cost

(U) Other Procurement, AF (0207438F) 58,025 48,433 51,259 50,862 52,027 56,911 49,678 47,902 Cont TBD
(U) Operations and Maintenance, AF (0207438F) 15,520 9,912 7,627 9,410 9,720 10,654 10,365 10,885 Cont TBD
(U) Operations and Maintenance, AF (0207415F) 7,679 9,105 18,566 20,505 20,871 22,302 13,376 13,645 Cont TBD



(U) D. Schedule Profile
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
(U) WCCS 1.2 Release X
(U) CTAPS Version 5.2 Release X
(U) TBMCS I&D Contract Award X
(U) TBMCS S/W Version 1.0
(U) Preliminary Design Review X
(U) In-Plant Test X
(U) Version 1.0 Release X
(U) TBMCS S/W Version 2.0
(U) Preliminary Design Review X
(U) In-Plant Test
(U) Version 2.0 Release
COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
3330 Cmd Cntrl Info Process Sys (C2IPS) 5,531 5,469 4,764 22,102 12,333 2,376 2,374 2,477 Continuing TBD

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The Command & Control Information Processing System (C2IPS) project develops communications and information processing hardware and software for all echelons of the Air Mobility Command (AMC). C2IPS provides AMC the capability to monitor in real-time the operational airlift and tanker functions associated with mission execution worldwide. The integration of C2IPS computer resources and software with improved High Frequency (HF) equipment and other available communications media will result in a unified AMC C2 System.

The C2IPS will be developed and installed in four increments. Increment 1 provided a digital data message handling capability at each Information Processing System (IPS) node and implements mission execution monitoring. Increment 2 builds on Increment 1 software to support mission planning and scheduling. Increment 3 will provide C2IPS with a client server architecture as part of the system migration efforts. Increment 4 completes the directed C2IPS efforts for the incremental development, and lays the foundation for the migration strategy that will merge features of C2IPS into TBMCS. This project is in Budget Category 7, Operational Systems Development and is a post-Milestone III effort.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands)
(U) $ 1,956 Complete Increment 2 software development.
(U) $ 3,189 Starts Increment 3 software development.
(U) $ 386 Continue implementation of force- and unit-level migration strategies.
(U) $5 4 software development.
(U) $ 1,336 Continue implementation of force- and unit-level migration strategies.
(U) $ 255 Complete Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) force and unit level migration.
(U) $5,469 Total

FY 1998 ($ in Thousands)
(U) $ 2,582 Increment 4 software development
(U) $ 2,182 Continue implementation of force- and unit-level migration strategies
(U) $4,764 Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands)
(U) $19,986 Theater Battle Management migration
(U) $ 2,116 Continue implementation of force- and unit-level migration strategies
(U) $22,102 Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 TBD
(U) Appropriated Value 5,701 5,779
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional Reductions -172
b. Small Business Innovative Research -138
c. Rescissions -170
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB +4,764 +22,102
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial 5,531 5,469 4,764 22,102 TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96: Rescissions include a distributed amount of reductions for Bosnia/Jordanian F-16s.

FY98 and 99 funds are realigned from project 4288.

Schedule: N/A

Technical: N/A

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) - Not Applicable.

(U) D. Schedule Profile
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY1998 FY1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
(U) Increment 2.0C
(U) Test Readiness Review (TRR) X
(U) Development Test & Evaluation

(DT&E)

X
(U) Increment 2.0D
(U) TRR X
(U) DT&E X
(U) Operational Test & Evaluation

(OT&E)

X
(U) Increment 3
(U) System Requirement Review (SSR) X
(U) PDR/CDR X
(U) TRR X
(U) DT&E X
(U) Increment 4
(U) SSR X
(U) PDR X
(U) TRR X
(U) DT&E X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) Major Product Development Contracts 3,024 3,614 2,582 19,986
(U) Support Contracts 1,861 1,394 1,754 1,582
(U) Program Management Support 646 461 428 534
(U) Total 5,531 5,469 4,764 22,102

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations
CSC C/FFIP/FP Dec 88 n/a n/a 4,106 3,024 3,614 2,582 19,986 Cont. TBD
Support and Management Organizations
MITRE SS/T&M Oct 94 n/a n/a 1,471 1,431 1,148 1,508 1,336 Cont. TBD
TEMS Various Various n/a n/a 230 430 246 246 246 Cont. TBD
ESC n/a n/a n/a n/a 824 646 461 428 534 Cont. TBD
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable.

Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
Subtotal Product Development 4,106 3,024 3,614 2,582 19,986 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Support and Management 2,525 2,507 1,855 2,182 2,116 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Total Project 6,631 5,531 5,469 4,764 22,102 Cont. TBD
COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
4287 Contingency Theater Automated Planning System (CTAPS) 18,425 23,970 12,886 9,222 8,765 6,847 11,522 11,879 Continuing TBD

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The Contingency Theater Automated Planning System (CTAPS) program directly supports the Joint Forces Air Component Commander (JFACC) in the planning and execution of the theater air campaign down to the unit level. The system is designed to an open system standard, promoting interoperability among USAF, Services, and Allied command and control systems. The air tasking order generation and dissemination capabilities of CTAPS are the standard for all DoD command and control systems. The program utilizes an evolutionary acquisition strategy that accommodates changes in user requirements and improvements in commercial technology through a series of planned incremental software releases. On-going efforts are migrating the current system to Global Command and Control System (GCCS) Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) common operating environment (COE), ensuring compatibility, interoperability, and commonality among services

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands)
(U) $ 3,000 Complete and field CTAPS software version 5.2.
(U) $ 5,425 Continue version planning process, design and development for TBMCS software version 1.0, and initiate full Ops/Intel interoperability.
(U) $ 500 Continue development and testing for a Battlefield Situational Awareness capability.
(U) $ 2,200 Continue Air Support Operations Center (ASOC) software development and complete engineering and manufacturing development effort.
(U) $ 215 Complete Rome Lab development of the Advanced Planning System (Transitioned to I&D Contractor).
(U) $ 5,000 Initiate Air Battle Planning and Architecture modifications to support the new Air Tasking Order (ATO) format.
(U) $ 775 Initiate Air Battle Operations and execution modifications to support the new ATO format.
(U) $ 1,310 Systems engineering and support.
(U) $18,425 Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands)
(U) $17,120 Complete version planning process, continue design/development of TBMCS version 1.0, and the full Ops/Intel interoperability.
(U) $ 1,300 Complete ASOC software development.
(U) $ 3,500 Continue Air Battle Planning and Architecture modifications to support the new Air Tasking Order (ATO) format.
(U) $ 1,000 Initiate version planning and design for TBMCS Version 2.
(U) $ 1,050 Systems engineering and support.
(U) $23,970 Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $ 9,593 Complete TBMCS software version 1.0 development and initiate TBMCS software version 2.0 development.
(U) $ 1,293 System engineering and support.
(U) $ 2,000 Integrate Combat Integration Capability (CIC) into TBMCS.
(U) $12,886 Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $ 6,862 Continue TBMCS software version 2.0 development and initiate TBMCS software version 3.0 planning and design.
(U) $ 1,360 System engineering and support.
(U) $ 1,000 Continue integration efforts of CIC into TBMCS.
(U) $9,222 Total
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget 18,555 21,634 11,231 8,500 TBD
(U) Appropriated Value 20,524 25,134
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional Reductions -1,034 -563
b. Small Business Innovative Research -634 -601
c. Rescissions -431
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB +1,655 +722
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget 18,425 23,970 12,886 9,222 TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96: In addition to cuts taken to pay for Congressionally mandated reductions, rescissions include a distributed amount of reductions for Bosnia/Jordanian F-16s and Administrative/Personnel reductions.

FY97: Appropriated Value includes $3,500,000 increase "to support a 1998 completion date of version 1.0 of the TBMCS."

FY98: Funds added integrate Combat Integration Capability (CIC) into TBMCS.

FY99: Funds added to continue to integrate CIC into TBMCS.

Schedule: Not Applicable.

Technical: FY 98/99: Add Combat Integration Capability (CIC) within TBMCS.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) - Please see Program Summary above.

(U) D. Schedule Profile - Please see Program Summary above.

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) System Integration and Development 17,115 22,920 11,593 7,862
(U) System Engineering 380 400 618 640
(U) TEMS 200 400 400 400
(U) SPO Support 730 250 275 320
(U) Total 18,425 23,970 12,886 9,222

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1997

>Budget

FY 1998

Budget

FY 1999

Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations
LMCCS C/CPAF/PR Oct 95 n/a n/a 1,169 10,640 21,620 11,593 7,862 Cont. TBD
SAIC (S/W INT) Hampton VA C/CPFF/FCA Mar 94 n/a n/a 11,085 3,000 0 0 0 0 14,085
SAIC (ASOC/BSD) Hampton VA, Anchorage AK C/CPFF/FCA Feb 94 n/a n/a 3,759 1,800 1,300 0 0 0 6,859
PARAMAX (APS) St Paul MN C/CPFF/FCA Mar 94 n/a n/a 1,207 0 0 0 0 0 1,207
INEL (ASOC) Idaho Falls ID C/CPFF/FCA Oct 94 n/a n/a 1,243 900 0 0 0 0 2,143
Miscellaneous Various Various n/a n/a 410 775 0 0 0 Cont. TBD


Support and Management Organizations
MITRE SS/T&M Oct 94 n/a n/a 5,237 380 400 618 640 Cont. TBD
TEMS C/T&M Various n/a n/a 1,430 200 400 400 400 Cont. TBD
Miscellaneous Various Various n/a n/a 2,137 730 250 275 320 Cont. TBD
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable

Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
Subtotal Product Development 18,873 17,115 22,920 11,593 7,862 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Support and Management 8,804 1,310 1,050 1,293 1,365 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 Cont. TBD
Total Project 27,677 18,425 23,970 12,886 9,222 Cont. TBD
COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
4288 Wing C2 System (WCCS) 3,447 3,327 6,363 4,017 3,874 3,918 0 0 0 31,778

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This project includes development of mission critical application software for WCCS operating on commercially available hardware and system software. Wing commanders require an accurate, composite picture of their wing's total resources to effectively command, control, and manage their forces in support of their combat sortie generation and reporting responsibilities. Key functional areas (operations, maintenance, mission planning, intelligence, weather, etc.) use WCCS to support the wing commander in the mission execution and reporting process by exchanging critical command and control and intelligence information with functional counterparts located throughout the wing. The introduction of increasingly sophisticated weapon systems - with their need for and ability to produce large amounts of data - require an automated C2 system to bring meaningful, consolidated information to the Commander in near real-time. Today, this information is relayed over secure and unsecured telephones, radios, and other communications devices, as well as by runners to update multi-user status displays (grease boards) or hand written logs. These techniques have not changed substantially since World War II, and are cumbersome, error-prone, are subject to security compromise, and involve duplication of effort. Disparate programs have led to the proliferation of stovepipe systems which can not provide interoperability and do not adequately meet the needs of today's air operations. The WCCS program will design, develop, and install an automated, standard wing-level C2 system that will be tailored to meet unique organizational requirements, provide interoperability, and reduce training and maintenance costs. This is in Budget Activity 7, Operational Systems Development. This program is a post-Milestone III effort.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $ 2,436 Initiate version planning process, design and development for TBMCS software version 1.0.
(U) Continue graphical user interface standardization.
(U) Continue Decision Support System (DSS) Module.
(U) Initiate Scheduler.
(U) Continue first phase of security enhancement implementation.
(U) Continue unit/force level integration.
(U) $ 1,011 System engineering and support.
(U) $3,447 Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $ 2,067 Continue design and development of TBMCS software version 1.0.
(U) Complete scheduler.
(U) Phase II Decision Support System (DDS) Module.
(U) Continue first phase of security enhancement implementation.
(U) Include/modify unit/force level interfaces (Air Force Mission Support System (AFMSS), Automated Weather Distribution System

(AWDS), Base Recovery Control System (BRCS), and Combat Ammunition System-Base (CAS-B).

(U) P3I efforts.
(U) Continue force/unit level migration.
(U) $ 500 Initiate TBMCS software version 2.0 version planning and design.
(U) $ 760 System engineering and support.
(U) $3,327 Total


(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $2,614 Development work to incorporate new ATO format into WCCS.
(U) $2,759 Continue TBMCS software version 1.0 development and initiate TBMCS software version 2.0 development.
(U) $ 990 System engineering and support.
(U) $6,363 Total


(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
(U) $3,067 Continue TBMCS software version 2.0 development; initiate planning and design for TBMCS software version 3.0.
(U) $1,950 System engineering and support.
(U) $4,017 Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)


FY 1996


FY 1997


FY 1998


FY 1999
Total

Cost

(U) FY 1997 President's Budget 3,588 3,502 3,749 3,911 TBD
(U) Appropriated Value 3,588 3,502
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional Reductions -92
b. Small Business Innovative Research -83
c. Rescissions -141
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB +2,614 +106
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget 3,447 3,327 6,363 4,017 TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96: Rescissions include a distributed amount of reductions for Bosnia/Jordanian F-16s.

FY98 and FY99: Funds added to integrate the new Air Tasking Order (ATO) into WCCS.

Schedule: N/A

Technical: FY 98 and 99: Add new format ATO capability.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) - Please see Program Summary above.

(U) D. Schedule Profile - Please see Program Summary above.

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) System Integration and Development 2,436 2,567 5,373 3,067
(U) System Engineering 344 400 470 440
(U) TEMS 220 200 280 280
(U) SPO Support 447 160 240 230
(U) Total 3,447 3,327 6,363 4,017

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1997

Budget

FY 1998

Budget

FY 1999

Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations
LMCCS C/CPAF/PR Oct 95 n/a n/a 50 2,436 2,567 5,373 3,067 Cont. TBD
SAIC C/CPFF/FCA Jan 94 n/a n/a 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,000
Support and Management Organizations
MITRE SS/T&M Oct 94 n/a n/a 750 344 425 470 440 Cont. TBD
Miscellaneous Various Various n/a n/a 904 642 335 520 510 Cont. TBD
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable

Government Furnished Property:
Item Description Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Property
Local Purchase Various Various Various 128 25 0 0 0 Cont. TBD
Support and Management Property - Not Applicable
Test and Evaluation Property - Not Applicable
Subtotal Product Development 5,178 2,461 2,592 5,373 3,067 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Support and Management 1,654 986 735 990 950 Cont. TBD
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 Cont. TBD
Total Project 6,832 3,447 3,327 6,363 4,017 Cont. TBD

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK