PROPOSED RESPONSE TO USCINCCENT MESSAGE

Filename:0134pgv.00d

                    PROPOSED RESPONSE TO USCINCCENT MESSAGE

l.[      (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4)    ]


B.    A radiation dispersal device (RDD) could be
constructed, however, the probability of this happening is
assessed as negligible for the following reasons:

     l.   The military utility of such a device would be very
     low.  Other than damage caused by blast or fragments,
     effects of an RDD using low-grade products would be minimal
     and easily countered by protective equipment.

     2.   There is no evidence of intent to produce a device.  RDD
     is a terrorist weapon and Iraq's motives are not the same as
     a terrorist.
     
	3.   Radioactive material is very expensive and too hard to
     come by to waste on an RDD.

     4.   Public reaction and possible retaliation.

C.   [      (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4)    ]


D. [      (b)(1) sec 1.3(a)(4)    ]




        
2.     The EUCOM NEST is always on a short (four hour)
availability.  If there is a need for their capabilities, they
will be made available.  However, considering the negligible
threat of an ROD, their deployment does not appear Justified at
this time.  There are concerns over their use.  For example:

       a.    What is their cOncept of operations considering their
       detection ability is limited to distances measured in 	     
    feet.

       b.   Team composition is 2 military and 6 civilians        
        augmented by military Searchers.  There would be 
limitation 	  on the use of the civilians in a hostile fire 
zone.

       c.   Loss of availability to EinCOff when their threat 
might 	  be increased.

3.  The Intelligence Task Force is constantly monitoring this
situation and will notify you of any change in the throat
situation.  Request you channel your request for DOE support
through the Crisis Action Team.  DOE is prepared to assist in
any -way possible.