Navigation

Spectral Analysis of Star Composition;

Element Synthesis in Stars

As was reviewed on page 20-1, in the first minutes of the Universe after the Big Bang, by far the most abundant element existing then was hydrogen, the simplest of all elements consisting of a single proton and a single electron (a fraction of the hydrogen atoms, the isotopes deuterium and tritium, contained 1 and 2 neutrons respectively). The only other elements produced in the beginning were helium, and a smattering of lithium and beryllium. Hydrogen is the fundamental constituent of the Universe, from whence all others of atomic numbers 2-4 (in addition to the primordial He, Li, and Be) and higher have been created after the Universe's opening moments.

Thus, most of the 88 elements of atomic number greater than 4 that occur naturally on Earth (21 more elements have been created solely in the laboratory by particle accelerators, etc.) or have been detected in stars have been, and are being, continuously created not in the first few minutes of the Big Bang but throughout subsequent Universe time within stars and are constantly being redistributed through destruction of stars (mainly by supernovae events) and reorganization of the debris into new stars, dust clouds, and under favorable circumstances into planets. Thus ever newer (younger) stars, as well as the interstellar medium, are becoming progressively richer in elements of atomic numbers greater than 2. Because so many of the stars in the early Universe were massive, short-lived, and subject to explosions, the heavier elements were more rapidly produced and released in the first few billion years than, say, the present.

The production of heavier elements almost certainly began as soon as the first stars formed in the first half billion years. Most such stars were massive and hence heavier elements were developed in their cores. These stars, being short-lived, exploded as supernovae and spread the interior elements into the growing Universe. As direct proof of the appearance of various element species in this timeframe, carbon monoxide has been detected spectrally in the light given off by one of the oldest quasars yet examined.

A good review of element production in stars are found at a site maintained by the Wright Center for Science Education; Tufts University.

Before we examine the element-forming processes involved, it is instructive to review how the composition of stars is determined. That determination is done primarily by spectroscopic analysis of the radiation emanating from the outer shells of a star, including (by analogy to the Sun) its chromosphere and photosphere. The principles involved in spectroscopy, as it is applied to obtaining spectral data of the Earth primarily by sampling reflected or emitted radiation of solar-irradiated surface and atmospheric features, were covered on page 13-6 (a review of that one page may prove helpful in working through the present page).

As applied to star analysis, four kinds of spectral data are relevant: 1) Continuous spectra; 2) Emission Line spectra; 3) Absorption Line spectra; and 4) Blackbody radiation spectra. The first three are illustrated here:

The three principal types of spectra.

A Continuum Spectrum, particularly as it applies to the UV, Visible, and Near IR segments of the ElectroMagnetic Spectrum, is that produced by white light, i.e., all wavelengths (all colors in the Visible) in this region are present in essentially equal proportions. An Emission Line Spectrum results when photons of narrow, specific wavelengths are emitted during excitation of the elements present in an emitting body; each (colored) line is diagnostic (identifies) some particular element. An Absorption Line Spectrum occurs when the emitted radiation from a hot body passes through cooler gases containing the same elements as those responsible for the emitted photons which interact (by absorption processes) and are removed from the continuum (as shown by black lines). A Blackbody Spectrum, discussed in detail on page 9-1 and 9-2, is a continuum spectrum that is associated with the thermal state of an emitting body considered to be a perfect radiator, especially one heated to incandescence, in which its spectral curve peaks at some wavelength which varies systematically with temperature. This figure should remind you of the information presented on page 9-2 dealing with Wien's Displacement Law.

Blackbody curves for several temperature maxima.

Now, in more detail: Each element has a series of spectral lines that are diagnostic, being found in fixed locations in a spread of the spectrum as determined by the wavelengths of emitted radiation resulting from excitation of electrons into higher energy levels (recall the formula: ΔE = hν). Emission lines relate to light (including UV and IR) radiation passing unimpeded from the source. But, starlight normally must pass through the star's atmosphere; if the outer gases contain the same elements as those from its surface, the emitted radiation will be absorbed at the characteristic wavelengths, giving rised to absorption spectra. The image below is the spectrum for our Sun, with the dark absorption (Frauenhofer) lines correlating mostly with hydrogen and helium:

Spectrum for the Sun's photosphere.

Since hydrogen is by far the most common element in the Universe, comments on its spectra are in order; the principles involved in the generation of hydrogen's spectral lines apply to all other elements. Radiation from excited hydrogen is detectable over most of the EM spectral range, but important and diagnostic radiation at specific wavelengths used by astronomers extend from the Ultraviolet through much of the Infrared Range. Emitted radiation results when the single electron in the neutral hydrogen atom is excited by various forms of energy (e.g., heat, electrical current, particle bombardment) such that the electron is displaced from its ground state to one or more of the various energy levels associated with the possible orbital levels surrounding the nucleus. These are energy levels that are discrete (specific values) in terms of the quantum states possible when excitation has occurred. These levels are, by convention, represented by the letter "N" and are expressed as integers from 1 through 2, 3, 4, 5,6, ..... infinity. In the ground state, the electron resides in level 1 (or shell, as is often depicted in the Bohr atom model). When excitation energy is provided, the electron can "jump" to higher (quantized) levels, as, for example from N = 1 to N = 3. That energy is calculated by the familiar Planck equation: ΔE = hν, where the ΔE is the energy required to move to a specific level, say from 1 to 3, shown as E3 - E1, h is the Planck constant, and ν is the frequency (its reciprocal is the wavelength λ. In the higher energy states (multiples of N greater than 1), the electron may remain for a time in a metastable mode but for most of the transitions the electron almost instantly returns to a lower energy state (either to the ground state N = 1 or to one of the lower levels of N than the level first reached by the electron. When the return occurs, the excitation energy is given off as photons whose specific frequency (or wavelength equivalent) is determined by ΔE. Examine this diagram:

Hydrogen spectral line series.

For the Lyman series (of transitions expressed as spectral lines of very precise wavelengths), the electrons will move to different N levels and then revert to the N = 1 state. For the Balmer series, the reverted level is N = 2; the Paschen series, N = 3. To illustrate with specific values, consider the Balmer series, in which the four principal lines, designated as Hα, Hβ, Hγ, and Hδ, require (in the same sequence) energies (hν)of 3.02 x 10-19 , 4.07 x 10-19, 4.57 x 10-19, and 4.84 x 10-19 Joules (J), and give off photons whose wavelengths (state here in nanometers [µm x 1000) are 656.3, 486.1, 434.0, and 410.2 nm respectively. The Balmer wavelengths are all in the Visible region of the spectrum. The Lyman series occurs in the Ultraviolet and the Paschen series in the near Infrared segments of the EM spectrum. There are other series (not named) elsewhere in the EM spectrum. Now, look at this next diagram - a variant of the one above but with added information:

Another version of the several named Hydrogen transition series.

All of these lines are found in solar spectra. A spectral curve (the spectrum as plotted on a strip chart recorder) from an O-type (very hot) star produces absorption spikes for the Balmer series in the Visible; it looks like this:

Plot of the spectral curve for a very hot O type star.

As was first treated, on page 20-5, letters in the sequence O-B-A-F-G-K-M refer to spectral classes of stars; the sequence is also an observed temperature indicator with each letter denoting a range of temperatures, with O hottest (greater than 10000°K) and M coolest (less than 3000°K), Typical spectra for the different classes of stars on the Main Sequence will include lines for hydrogen, helium, and other elements, shown as follows:

Spectra for star classes on the Main Sequence.

The following are principal spectral lines within the Visible spectrum representing the different stellar classes, with surface temperatures plotted on the ordinate:

Star class spectra within the Visible.

This next diagram helps to categorize the spectral classes O through M, in which for each class a range of spectral lines of certain individual or several elements are diagnostic and may predominate. Thus an A star shows strong hydrogen lines with some neutral helium and ionized metals contributing their lines whereas a K star spectrum is predominantly that of calcium and excited neutral metals.

Spectral regions for the different star classes, showing the dominant or defining element for each and the spectral range of its individual spectral lines.

Characteristic spectra ranges of for the different Main Sequence star classes; the temperatures shown are not linear, so that the left end marks temperatures around 30000 degrees Kelvin.

This can be restated in the following chart that names the star class, its intrinsic surface color, a characteristic surface temperature, and the principal diagnostic spectral lines.

Table relating M.S. star classes to their color, temperature, and elements in the absorption spectra that are characteristic of the star's surface chemistry, and indicative of its composition.

The stars off the Main Sequence will, of course, show different spectral patterns depending on their compositions. Below are two sets of spectral curves, with individual lines noted as downward spikes in part of a Blackbody spectrum (see page 9-2) in the spectral range from 4000-9000 nm (0.4-0.9 µm) range. The left set covers spectra from Blue Giants; the right from Red Giants. The shift in peaks is a function of temperature. The left group is dominated by hydrogen lines; in the right group some lines include calcium.

Blue Giant Spectra. Red Giant Spectra

These plots suggest that the shape of the overall Blackbody spectrum will vary as a function of temperature. This is apparent in these generalized Blackbody spectral curves for a very hot star (Spica), the Sun, and the cool star Antares:

Blackbody curves for a hot star, a Sunlike star, and a cool star.

The general Blackbody curve as it shifts with temperature also aids in showing how individual stars display the colors astronomers assign to them. Consider this illustration:

Three Blackbody curves, for an O, a G, and an M class star, with the visible spectrum inserted in its proper place within each curve.

The left curve, for a cool star, shows that the part of the highest part on the curve intersected by the color spread in the Visible spectrum is associated with red, hence such stars are defined colorwise by Red. In the middle curve, the high point on the curve is straddled by yellow; a Sunlike star then is Yellow (or Orange). The right curve, for a hot star, has the visible blue at a higher intensity than green or red and hence defines a Blue star (actually, as it appears, such a star is a bright bluish-white).

This suggests that color can be used in the Letter classification. Astronomers have developed a Color Index system of relating stars to their surface temperatures. A given star is observed through a telescope at three different wavelength ranges, one (U) centering in part of the Ultraviolet, a second (B) in the Blue, and a third (V) in the longer wavelength part of the Visible. The starlight passes through three filters, as shown:

Bandpass Filters used in determining Color Index; each shows its characteristic peak and range of wavelengths transmitted through the filter; the human eye response is shown for comparison.

The intensity of light received through each filter can either be expressed in flux terminology or, more commonly, converted into an apparent magnitude value "m" appropriate to the spectral range (e.g., mB). In turn, this magnitude must then be converted an absolute magnitude M and then corrected for atmospheric effect to produce what is termed a bolometric magnitude Mbol. This is necessary so that all stars are compared in brightness at the same fixed distance. A Color Index value in the UBV system is then calculated as B - V (and/or U - B), by mathematically subtracting the bolometric magnitudes, as for instance, mB - MV

. This is a B - V vs temperature plot for three classes of stars (O. G, M):

B-V plot for 3 stars with differing surface temperatures.

The Index can have positive or negative values. Hotter stars have C.I.'s that are negative or slightly positive; as magnitudes decrease with lower temperatures the Index becomes more positive. The Sun's B - V Color Index is +0.62. In the third illustration above the star Spica has a B - V of -0.22 and Betelgeuse a value of +1.85. A hotter star than the Sun would have a smaller +C.I. or, with increasing temperature, values that become negative.

Now, with this background, let us turn our attention to how elements of atomic number above 4 have been produced by stellar processes. In the first half billion or so years after the Big Bang, the elemental chemistry of the Universe was quite simple. Hydrogen and helium dominated, with very small amounts of several slightly heavier elements produced during the early days. As galaxies began to organize from clots of slightly denser hydrogen, the first stars formed. At that time many (most) were very massive O and B types. These have very short lifetimes, sometimes burning their fuel in a few million years. Their fate is to explode as supernovae, as described on page 20-6. Even smaller stars that work through the Red Giant stage have, or will, eventually cast off a considerable amount of their elemental constituents enroute to becoming White Dwarfs.

Stars, particularly the massive ones mentioned above, are the furnaces in which the elements beyond H, He, and some Li are created (stellar nucleosynthesis) by successive steps in nuclear fusion in which more and more protons and neutrons are joined into stable to unstable nuclei. The development of shells of elements with mass numbers greater than 2 is shown for two common cases: 1) a star of overall mass and size similar to the Sun, and 2) A star with about 100 solar masses (not scaled; the stars are not the same size).

Cutaway showing element production in a star of mass similar to the Sun

Cutaway showing element production in a star of about 100 solar masses.

Stars with solar masses between 1 and 10 (those that follow the asymptotic giant branch [AGB] described on page 20-5) tend to burn their helium into carbon and some oxygen but do not form elements of higher atomic numbers. Much of the burning involves fusion of three helium atoms according to this sequence:

Two step process of helium fusion into carbon.

The red giant that results shows the distribution of elements after fusion has produced these element shells;

Cross-section of a Red Giant entering the AGB phase of stellar evolution.

A typical, but somewhat generalized sequence of nucleosynthesis of elements of atomic number higher than oxygen (>8) is depicted in the figure below for a star composed initially of 25 solar masses (MO) of hydrogen, but now is approaching (there is some hydrogen left) its final stage of evolution (before exploding as a supernova_ in which the star consists of a sequence of elements formed progressively with depth as it heated up and contracted. Stars with greater than 10 solar masses will proceed to the iron core stage; a Sun-sized star reaches only the carbon core stage.


As a massive hydrogen-rich star contracts and experiences greater pressures, helium is the first nuclear product within its core region. The energy released from fusion, along with continuing densification, yields higher temperatures (1-2 x 108 K) that transmute this innermost helium into carbon (by fusion of three helium nuclei) while producing new helium at the next outer shell, but with hydrogen still dominant. This so-called CNO (Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen) burning cycle is illustrated here:

The CNO cycle.

Once carbon is formed in abundance, this helium is generated as an end product of the CNO cycle. In this, some C12 reacts with protons to generate, in successive steps, N13, N14, N15 and then O15. After this last step, that unstable oxygen isotope can fuse with a proton and then decay by fission, thereby releasing an alpha particle (He4, stripped of its electrons) causing the reversion to C12.

Ever greater contraction, with concomitant temperatures reaching > 5 x 108 K for elements like sodium and magnesium, 1 x 109 K for oxygen, and approaching 3 x 109 K for nickel, cobalt, and iron, can progressively generate the elements listed in the figure up to iron (plus others of lesser atomic numbers) in amounts proportional to the comparative solar masses indicated. Thus, a star massive enough to ultimately achieve an iron core also contains elements of lower atomic numbers in its outer shells, broadly distributed in the relative positions shown in the figure, reflecting response to the fuel to outwardly decreasing densities and temperatures. Iron (atomic number Z [no. of protons]= 26; mass number A [number of protons + neutrons] = 56) is the heaviest element producible directly by stellar fusion. In fusion, nuclear binding energies for the new nuclides increase gradually up to iron but the mass of a fused nuclide is less than the sum of the fusing constituents. The missing mass is converted to energetic particles (E = mc2), given off as gamma rays, neutrinos, positrons, and others; thus the fusion process is always an energy-releasing one.

After stars which have become enriched in the elements between C and Fe through fusion undergo destruction to White Dwarfs, these dwarfs will be composed largely of the highest atomic number element reached as the star enters the Giant phase. Many of the White Dwarfs around 4-6 times as massive as the Sun will consist primarily of carbon. Neutron stars, the end product of more massive star explosions, do not have any specific element since protons and electrons have been forced together to make neutrons, thus destroying the elemental identity reached by these stars prior to this extreme transition.

Elements with A greater than Fe have decreasing binding energy and to form require energy input from non-fusion processes (principally neutron capture). Because those stars capable of synthesizing elements up to Fe have masses greater than 10 solar masses, these stars at their end stage of fusion will rapidly (over spans of hundreds of years) collapse and explode (fly apart) as supernovae. This gives rise to intense neutron fluxes that manufacture various elements including those with A > 56 , most of which become rapidly dispersed into interstellar space. These heavier elements, along with H, He and the A < 56 elements (which include O, S, C, N, Fe, Mg, Ca, Al, Na, and K - the dominant constituents making up the planets), can thereafter collect into new nebulae (clouds) that may reorganize into additional stars, setting up further nucleosynthesis. The elements were mostly created in the first few billion years when rates of star formation, burning, and explosive destruction were higher than present, but the process of element production still goes on. Elemental materials not reincorporated in stars are available to organize into compounds that make up the dust, gases, and particles from which planetary bodies are assembled.

As explained earlier, stars capable of synthesizing the heavier elements are also larger and thus fated to be destroyed explosively. In so doing, they expel and disperse the heavier elements in mixes of dust particles and gases. These recollect over time in nebular masses that become the new "nurseries" for later (younger) stars. Many of those in turn will give off the heavier elements in surface expulsions as Red Giants strip down and if large enough as supernovae. Thus the interstellar space is continually gaining a new chemical mix of elements, tending towards loss of hydrogen/helium and proportionately higher percentages of the elements of the remainder of the Periodic Table. As more stars form, not only do they contain some fraction of these elements but the associated dust/gas clouds may by then have enough of those elements we associate with planets and organic matter.

There is growing evidence that a significant fraction of the heavier elements were and are being produced in the myriads of Dwarf Galaxies (most still undetected because of their reduced luminosities) that pervade the Universe. Many of these undergo extended periods of star formation and correlative supernovae bursts, releasing these elements to intergalactic space. In this Chandra image of NGC 020724, a dwarf about 7 million light years away, giant bubbles of hot (10 million degrees) supernova gases undergoing rapid expansion have been shown spectroscopically to contain enrichments of oxygen, neon, magnesium and silicon.

Dwarf galaxy NGC 020724, imaged by the Chandra X-ray satellite, showing exploding supernova bubbles; different colors indicate large amounts of such elements as oxygen and silicon.

Having now reviewed how the elements are produced from Big Bang and subsequent stellar processes, we should mention something about the relative abundances of the various elements throughout the Universe. This turns out to be a difficult task for one obvious reason. Spectroscopic measurements of elements from the distant stars are strongly biased towards only those elements in excited states at or near the stellar surface. Those elements principally in the interior do not contribute to surface radiation in the same proportions as actually exist in a star. Only estimates based on stellar interior models can be made. The situation is better for our own star, the Sun. When element distributions are stated as Cosmic Abundances, they actually are rough estimates made from Solar Abundances . And, the latter abundances are not the same as the much better known Earth Abundances. Below are two plots: Solar and Earth Abundances:

Solar Abundances of the Elements; there is an error in the labeling = H& should be He.

Relative abundances of the elements in the Earth.

Note that the ordinate for the Earth Abundance diagram is given in terms of mass fraction (all elements together would make up 1, or 100%; note that Oxygen and Iron are the two most abundant in/on/above the Earth). The Solar Abundance ordinate compares all elements to Hydrogen (as scaled to an arbitrary H = 1012 atoms. We will take a closer look at the left half of the Solar (Cosmic) Abundance curve with this version

A different version of the Solar/Cosmic Element Abundance plot.

Several comments about this (these) abundance plots are in order: First, the general trend is towards ever decreasing abundances as the atomic number increases. Second, there is a distinct zig-zag (up-down) pattern to the whole curve. For example, between carbon and oxygen there is a decrease (the element is Nitrogen); between neon and magnesium the decrease element is sodium; the largest drop is between oxygen and neon, the element that thus decreases notably is fluorine. The reason for this fluctuating pattern is just this: elements with odd numbers of nucleons (protons and neutrons) are less stable, resulting in one unpaired (odd) proton or neutron - those that pair these particles result in offsetting spins in opposite directions that enhance stability (all this is part of the quantum theory of nuclear arrangements). Third, there is a huge drop in abundance for the Lithium-Beryllium-Boron (Li-Be-B) triplet. This results from two factors: 1) At the Big Bang, nuclear processes that could fuse the proper H or He isotopes into Li and/or the other two were statistically very rare and hence inefficient, and 2) Some of the Li-Be-B that formed and survived may be destroyed in processes with stars.

A somewhat easier task is to compare stars and galaxies in terms of their metallicities - a ratio of all amount of all elements with atomic numbers greater than 2 to the amount of hydrogen present. Astronomers use the word "metal" differently from chemists. A metal for a chemist includes only those elements in the Periodic Table labeled IB through VIIIB. Astronomers simply include all elements (including those with non-metallic properties) beyond He as "metals".

The "metal" composition of the Sun is fairly well known. Actually, the measurements are made on the chromosphere, the dominantly hydrogen gas which constitutes the solar atmosphere. The source of spectral radiation, however, comes mainly from the photosphere. The relative numbers of elements within the compressed body of the Sun is different, but good estimates can be made based on element distribution models. One element that gives many strong spectral lines is Iron (Fe). This element is chosen as an indicator of the Sun's metallicity; it proxies for all metals whose amounts tend to vary systematically with the iron concentration. Both the amount of iron and of hydrogen present at the surface can be calculated from the strengths of selected hydrogen and iron spectra derived from analysis of their absorption lines as their quantized radiation passes through the chromosphere.

From these compositional data a quantity determined as the ratio of amount of iron to amount of hydrogen (Fe/H) can be calculated for the Sun. It is arbitrarily set = 1. Corresponding ratios are determined for either individual stars or for galaxies (in which the Fe/H depends on the gross or composite average of these two elements resulting from radiation emitted by all stars, intragalactic gas, and halos within a given galaxy). By convention, the Fe/H ratio values are expressed as log10 numbers. This is a commonly used formula for comparing Fe/H ratios of stars to that of the Sun:

Mathematical relation between Fe/H for the Sun and for a star.

Thus the Sun's Fe/H is the log of 1 or 0. A star with a ratio of 1 to 100 yields a log value of -2; this also means that the metals abundances are 1% of that established for the Sun. A star whose log is +1 contains ten times as much metals as the Sun. Measurements for thousands of stars have established that the range of log values is from -4 (very metal-poor) to +1 (very metal-rich).

Some general observations about the characteristics of stars as indicated by their metallicities: 1) the disk portion of a galaxy has a range of metallicities, with Population I stars having values > -1, i.e., towards smaller negative numbers to positive numbers less than +1, whereas Population II stars have negative values beyond - 1; 2. globular clusters and halo stars are metal-poor (values more negative than -1); 3) metal-rich stars are in the red segment of the Color Index and metal-poor stars are blue; 4) although there can be complexities, in general metal-poor stars are young in appearance (either near the outer limits of the Universe which show stars that formed in the first few billion years after the Big Bang or stars formed more recently from gas clouds that have had little contribution of heavier elements from supernovae) and short-lived; 5) metal-rich stars from F, G, K, and M positions on the Main Sequence are redder than stars of similar sizes (masses); and 6) dust around a star will make it redder.

Overall, the rule of thumb is just that a star will show a metallicity that depends on prior processes that have changed the composition of the interstellar gas in the neighborhood in which it forms. This is a function mainly of the number of supernovae that have occurred previous to the formation of the star and the amounts of metals each ejected that then became mixed into the cloud that supplies the star (and other stars growing from this cloud). Since, over time the gas composition in the interstellar medium should progressively enrich in metals, then those stars that are metal-rich tend to have organized in later stages of a galaxy's history.

From the above it follows that stars that are extremely metal-poor are likely to be first-generation and thus primitive. HE0107-5240, a small star in our Milky Way some 36000 light years from Earth, has an age estimated to be at least 12 billion years, making it the oldest star examined to date. Here it is:

HE0107-5240, the oldest star yet found in the Milky Way.

This star is extremely metal-poor, as indicated by this series of spectra:

Spectra for the Sun, compared to a typical Milky Way star and to HE0197-5240, and the 'hypothetica' pristine Population 3 star (none yet found).

The ratio of Fe atoms to H atoms for the Sun is 1/31000. The Fe/H ratio for HE0107-5240 is dramitically lower, 1/6,800,000,000. Its composition then indicates that it had to form early in Universe history when enrichment of the heavier elements had scarcely begun in consequence of numerous early supernovae.

Metallicity has a practical significance to this Earth's inhabitants. Life does not apparently form around all stars from O to M types. It tends to develop around those stars that will produce planets of the right composition. Thus, the degree of element abundance and enrichment become a vital factor. The dust around a star has a composition that is related to the extent of metallicity found in that star. Only a small fraction of all the stars is likely to have a suitable metallicity that extends to its surrounding dust and gases, such that planets with Earthlike conditions are produced. We were lucky.

Now, putting the above information on element production in the context of the existence of thinking organisms: Life on Earth (and probably elsewhere) is based on carbon and a few other elements (principally H, N, and O, but smaller amounts of P, S, and traces of Fe and other heavier elements). Where does the carbon come from? As we have already alluded to, scientists generally agree that matter was originally present in the form of hydrogen, and that heavier elements up to Fe were constructed by fusing together hydrogen nuclei (protons) with neutrons and electrons. This process involves the conversion of a small amount of mass to energy, according to Einstein's E = mc2. In the 1930s, Hans Bethe showed that the energy radiated from the sun and stars could be produced by either or both of two sequences of nuclear reactions: (1) the "proton cycle" in which protons are fused to form helium nuclei (each having 2 protons and two neutrons); (2) the "carbon cycle" in which a carbon nucleus (6 protons and 6 neutrons) absorbs a helium nucleus to form an oxygen nucleus. But there did not seem to be any way to get from helium to carbon. The most obvious path would be to combine two helium nuclei to produce an isotope of beryllium with 4 protons and 4 neutrons, but that isotope is not stable (it takes one more neutron to produce a stable isotope) and calculations showed that it would not last long enough to pick up another helium nucleus to yield carbon. However, in 1953 Fred Hoyle predicted that the carbon nucleus has an excited state with just the right energy to match the energy of beryllium plus helium, producing a resonance which allows the reaction to produce carbon in the interior of a star. His prediction was confirmed by experiments at CalTech, and the helium --> beryllium --> carbon reaction is now considered a crucial step in a more general scheme of nuclear reactions that produce all the heavier elements. Hoyle later noted that his prediction was a successful application of the "anthropic principle": the Universe must have the properties needed to allow the evolution of life, otherwise humans wouldn't be here to study it. If some of the physical constants had slightly different values, the carbon nucleus would not have an excited state with the right energy to make this reaction go, and carbon-based life (especially us) could not exist.

As a bottom line aside, remember what we commented on in page 20-1: that the atoms and molecules making up everything on Earth including our own bodies have had a continuous existence from varying time spans in Universe history. Many elements have originated in supernovae that fed material from our galaxy into the cloud leading to the organization of the Sun and its planets. Hydrogen in the organisms of Earth, and in you particularly, is traceable to the very beginning of cosmic time since many (perhaps most) of the individual hydrogen atoms and all our protons in today's living creatures were formed during the Big Bang itself. Thus, parts of you and me, mainly the hydrogen in our body water and most organic molecules, are in actuality 13.7 billion years old, having participated in the processes during the first few minutes to become end products during the Big Bang key stages. Others of our atoms came to be during stellar evolution. Most of the elements higher in atomic number than helium have, at one time or various times, also resided in interstellar gas and dust. Most startling of all, one form of immortality guaranteed to each of us, is that our body atoms will live on for all of the future, since the fundamental precept that "matter [made during the first minute] is neither created nor destroyed" since the Big Bang at least (although atomic species beyond hydrogen were produced later) has so far not been disproven. We truly are Star People who have had our moment of existence in the Grand Panorama of Cosmology. If there is no heaven or afterlife of the spirit, then at best our body constituents (although dispersed and perhaps recombined) are assured of another kind of eternity (mostly being incorporated into inanimate objects; some atoms could find their way into living forms in future generations [this, in addition to our potential for creating life by the usual means of reproduction]). And, the writer's personal hope: if I should find myself in some kind of immortality in which my intellect survives and functions, I intend to try to find answers to some of the fundamental questions raised in this Section. (Heady stuff: you can see that the writer's decision to minor in Philosophy of Science at MIT has led to something provocative.)

Navigation

Next Previous Next Table of Contents Previous


Primary Author: Nicholas M. Short, Sr. email: nmshort@ptd.net