0101113F B-52 Squadrons

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This program is in budget activity 7 - Operational System Development, Research Category 6.6 because it supports a currently operational system. The B-52 is the primary nuclear roled bomber in the USAF inventory. It provides the only Air Launch Cruise Missile carriage in the USAF. The B-52 also provides theater CINCs with a long range strike capability. The B-52 is undergoing a Conventional Enhancement Modification which allows it to carry MIL-STD 1760 weapons. The current service life of the aircraft extends to 2040. The Advanced Weapons Integration (AWI) program supports the conventional enhancement of the B-52 through the addition of the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (WCMD), Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), Joint Stand-off Weapon (JSOW), and the Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missile (JASSM). The Air Force Mission Support System supports the Air Force movement of all mission planning to a common system. GPS TACAN Emulation provides support to the Congressionally-directed GPS-2000. Electronic Countermeasures Improvement supports a DESERT STORM identified deficiency. The B-61 Mod 11 program was added at the direction of the Nuclear Posture Review and Presidential Decision Directive-30. The B-52 program management is provided by Air Force Material Command's Oklahoma Air Logistics Center. The prime contractor for these projects is Boeing Defense and Space Group.

(U) Acquisition Strategy:

1. The AFMSS program is organically conducted at OC-ALC/LAS. Previously funded by the AFMSS program element.

2. The AWI program placed Boeing Defense and Space Group, Wichita KS, (BD&SG) on a Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee contract as the Product Development Organization supported by OC-ALC/LH. Due to the short notice requirement, interface development and initial software requirements definition is being accomplished under the B-52 fleet support contract; a time and materials contract. The first phase will be to support the Direct Attack Stores Management Overlay (SMO) Developmental Test and Evaluation (DT&E) and DT&E of hardware interface equipment. The Direct Attack SMO supports WCMD and JDAM. The second phase will support the DT&E of the Stand-off SMO. The Stand-off SMO supports JSOW and JASSM. Due to the need for rapid Required Assets Availability and Initial Operational Capability dates, the Single Acquisition and Management Plan directed concurrence for RDT&E of the Direct Attack SMO and the production hardware (MIL-STD 1760 umbilicals to transfer 1760 data from the weapons pylon to the weapon itself). Although production continues through development of the Stand-off SMO, development of the production materials is completed in FY 97. JSOW and JASSM will use the same umbilicals as WCMD and JDAM.

3. The GPS TACAN program placed Boeing Defense and Space Group, Wichita, KS on a Firm-Fixed-Price contract as the Product Development Organization, supported by OC-ALC/LH, WR-ALC/LKN.

4. The ECM Improvement program placed Boeing Defense and Space Group, Wichita, KS and ITT Avionics Nutley, NJ on Firm-Fixed-Price contracts as Product Development Organizations. Boeing provides the aircraft specific integration expertise, while ITT provides expertise on the ALQ-172 system. They are supported by OC-ALC/LH and WR-ALC/LNR.

5. The Department of Energy is organically conducting the modifications to the B-61 Mod 11 weapon.

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	16,505	7,457	955	0	24,917
(U) Appropriated Value	21,005	11,035			21,005
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	-1,129	-231
b. SBIR		-192
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	0		2,472	3,765
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	19,870	10,612	3,427	3,765	37,674

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY 96 Congressional Appropriations added $4.5M for AGM-130 Integration. Since Air Combat Command did not have a requirement to integrate the AGM-130 on the B-52 Congress authorized the Air Force to transfer these funds into the B-62 Mod 11 program. FY 98 PB adds $2.5M to FY 98 and $3.8M to FY 99 for Advanced Weapons Integration.

Schedule: None

Technical: None

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) Aircraft Procurement (PE 11113F)	4,765	8,782	28,854	61,641	43,039	34,241	20,953	6,779	0	209,054
(U) Missile Procurement (PE 11113F)	2,002	1,855	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a	3,857
(U) Mission Planning Systems (PE 28006F)	180	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a	180

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) WCMD/JDAM IOC						X
(U) GPS TACAN IOC										X
(U) ECM Improvement IOC														X
(U) B-61 Mod 11 Flight Test Completed				X

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4401	Air Force Mission Support System	2,801	5,200	948	0	0	0	0	0	0	8,949

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

Air Force Mission Support System (AFMSS) previously funded out of the AFMSS program element. Develops an aircraft specific avionics/weapons/electronic countermeasures (A/W/E) module to be used in conjunction with core AFMSS. AFMSS is the replacement mission planning system for the current B-52 Mission Data Preparation System. AFMSS will provide future ground/inflight mission planning capability. Block 1 provides the capability to plan conventional gravity missions at the unit level. Block 2 provides the capability to plan nuclear and advanced weapons via AFMSS. Block 3 of this project will add smart weapons (like JDAM and JASSM) capabilities and enhancements to the first two AFMSS blocks. Provides funding for the Periodic Depot Maintenance of the B-52 test aircraft stationed at Edwards Air Force Base.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $2,801	Support WCMD and JDAM flight test with Block 1.3 engineering release
(U) $2,801	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $5,200	Develop Block 2 operational software for WCMD and JDAM, and PDM for the B-52 test aircraft
(U) $5,200	Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $948	Develop Block 3 operational software for JSOW and JASSM, and other advanced weapons, as required
(U) $948	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	2,983	5,507	951	0	6,320
(U) Appropriated Value	2,983	5,507	0	0	8,490
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	-182	0	0	0	-182
b. SBIR	0	0	0	0	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0	0	0	0	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0	0	0	0	0
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	-182	-307	-3	0	-492
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	2,801	5,200	948	0	8,949

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: $3,121 added to FY97 budget to support Periodic Depot Maintenance of the B-52 test aircraft.

Schedule: None

Technical: None

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) - not applicable

(U) D. Schedule Profile

The B-52 peculiar mission planning software development is accomplished and delivered incrementally. Each work package within a block build is treated as a mini-development with its own analysis, design, and test. The work package are integrated with one another and with the AFMSS core. Requirements are continually evolving, however, the program is geared to complete known requirements by Sep 98.

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) Contract award Block 2				X
(U) Software development Block 2					X	X	X	X	X
(U) Contract award Block 3								X
(U) Software development Block 3									X	X	X	X
(U) Test aircraft PDM					X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Software development	2,751	2,050	885	0
(U) System Program Office support	50	50	63	0
(U) OC-ALC/LH Program Depot Maintenance	0	3,100	0	0
(U) Total	2,801	5,200	948	0

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Oklahoma ALC/LAS

Project Order

5,686

0

2,751

2,050

885

0

n/a

5,686

Support and Management Organizations

OC-ALC/LH OC-ALC/LH

Project order Project order

163 3,100

0

50

50 3,100

63

0

n/a

3,263

Test and Evaluation Organizations

OO-ALC/LIRC USAFAWC/28 TESTS

compatability flight testing Project order

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4370	Advanced Weapons Integration	3,832	0	2,479	3,765	0	0	0	0	0	10,076

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The requirement exists for the integration of near precision and precision guided MIL-STD 1760 weapons on the B-52. This includes the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (WCMD), Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), Joint Stand-off Weapon (JSOW), and the Joint-Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missile (JASSM). The B-52 is designated as the threshold bomber test platform for WCMD, JDAM, and JASSM with the objective of meeting aircraft integration and weapon testing requirements. To provide complete understanding of the program and its funding, the following schedule information will reflect the money received from the WCMD, JDAM, and JASSM program elements for weapons integration on the B-52.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $3,832	Software requirements for WCMD and JDAM. Hardware requirements for WCMD, JDAM, JSOW, and JASSM.
(U) $3,832	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0

Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $2,479	Software development for JSOW and JASSM
(U) $2,479	Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $3,765	Software development for JSOW and JASSM
(U) $3,765	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	3,977	0	2,489	3,784	10,250
(U) Appropriated Value	3,900	0	0	0	3,900
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	-68	0	0	0	-68
b. SBIR	0	0	0	0	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0	0	0	0	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0	0	0	0	0
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	0	0	-10	-19	6,176
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	3,832	0	2,479	3,765	10,076

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY 96 -$68K Undistributed Congressional Reductions.

Schedule: None

Technical: None

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) RDT&E (WCMD - PE 27600F)	5,900	3,035	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a	8,935
(U) RDT&E (JDAM - PE 27583F)	4,525	7,110	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a	11,635
(U) RDT&E (JASSM - PE 27160F)	1,500	8,500	8,000	3,400	0	0	0	0	n/a	21,400
(U) Aircraft Procurement (PE 11113F)	0	4,181	6,600	5,100	0	0	0	0	n/a	15,881

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

(U) Direct Attack SMO

(U) Software/hardware Req DT&E

X

X

X

(U) Test planning

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Technical data development

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Ground/flight testing

X

X

X

X

(U) AFMSS module DT&E

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Program office support

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Stand-off SMO

(U) Contractor Interface Development

X

X

(U) Software/hardware Req DT&E

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Test planning

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Technical data development

X

X

X

(U) Ground/flight testing

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) AFMSS module DT&E

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) Program support office

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Software/hardware requirements	3,832	0	2,479	3,765
(U) Total	3,832	0	2,479	3,765

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Boeing Defense and Space Group Wichita, KS

CPFF

10,076

0

0

3,832

0

2,479

3,765

n/a

10,076

Support and Management Organizations

Test and Evaluation Organizations

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property: None

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4371	Global Positioning System TACAN Emulation	8,866	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	8,866

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

GPS TACAN Emulation includes installation of a Control Display Unit (CDU) at the pilot and copilot stations and the integration of concurrent TACAN capabilities into the on-board GPS system. The TACAN Replacement System (TRS) will satisfy current TACAN emulation requirements directed by Congressional mandate and provide an architecture to expand/increase navigational capabilities/requirements planned by FAA and International Civil Organization bodies. The system allows the crew to fly a non-precision approach using the GPS constellation for navigation guidance. In addition, as an open architecture system, it can be easily upgraded to allow precision approaches when standards are established.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $1,281	System Requirement Review completion
(U) $100	Preliminary Design Review
(U) $1,900	Fabrication of lab demonstration system
(U) $3,300	Fabrication of system mock-up
(U) $2,000	Fabrication of prototype unit
(U) $85	Critical Design Review
(U) 200	Test and Evaluation
(U) $8,866	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0

No activity

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0

No activity

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0

No activity

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	9,545	0	0	0	9,545
(U) Appropriated Value	9,360	0	0	0	9,360
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	-494	0	0	0	-494
b. SBIR	0	0	0	0	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0	0	0	0	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0	0	0	0	0
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	-494	0	0	0	-494
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	8,866	0	0	0	8,866

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: $494 taken in FY 96 for Undistributed Congressional Reductions and bills to pay for Bosnia operations.

Schedule: Schedule changes were necessary to provide concurrent RDT&E with GPS Line-Replaceable-Units (LRU) redesign effort. The requirement for 24 additional aircraft to receive NAVSTAR GPS provoked re-design of key Group B LRUs. The TRS new start provided an opportunity to combine the two efforts, reducing additional LRUs originally planned for TRS and incorporating requirements into a single, integrated design. Thus, instead of designing and fielding two separate systems (GPS and TRS), the software and hardware requirements will be integrated. Reducing engineering time and independent costs associated with each program.

Technical: Technical changes include eliminating the requirement for a separate Interface Unit for TACAN and integrating TACAN system requirements in the GPS Interface Unit, currently installed on NAVSTAR GPS equipped aircraft. This also eliminates the requirement for a Signal Data Converter to interface the GPS and TRS. The majority of the TRS program requirements will affect software integration. The hardware requirements are essentially CDUs at the pilot and copilot positions and associated Group A necessary for installation.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) Aircraft Procurement (PE 11113F)	0	3,000	11,400	15,700	4,662	0	0	0	n/a	34,762

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) Contract award		X
(U) System Requirement Review documentation		X
(U) Human resource interface on equipment placement			X
(U) Preliminary Design Review			X
(U) Fabrication of upgraded development at contractor support facilities				X	X	X
(U) Critical Design Review						X
(U) Development of prototype unit							X	X	X
(U) Ground/flight testing									X	X	X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) System Requirement Review completion	1,281
(U) Preliminary Design Review completion	100
(U) Fabrication of lab demonstration system	1,900
(U) Fabrication of system mock-up	3,300
(U) Fabrication of prototype unit	2,000
(U) Critical Design Review	85
(U) Test and evaluation	200
(U) Total	8,866

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Boeing Defense and Space Group Wichita, KS

FFP

Mar 96

8,766

0

8,766

0

0

0

n/a

8,766

Support and Management Organizations

OC-ALC/LH WR-ALC/LKN

50 50

0

50 50

0 0

0 0

0 0

n/a n/a

50 50

Test and Evaluation Organizations

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property: None

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4402	Electronic Countermeasures Improvement	0	4,818	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4,818

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The electronic countermeasures of the B-52 ALQ-172 ECM suite must be improved to cover a requirement identified during DESERT STORM. The improvement provides for an increased memory capability to handle advanced threats as well as correcting a coverage capability problem. The project adds a third ALQ-172 to the ECM suite and develops the new display required by the addition of the third system. The modification also improves two common core Line-Replaceable-Units. Normal circuit cards are replaced with circuit cards holding erasable PROMs and gate array modules. Memory is increased 400% and Mean-Time-Between-Failure is increased. Development program will be completed in FY 97.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0	No activity
(U) $0	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $150	System Requirement Review
(U) $300	Fabrication of lab mock-up
(U) $4,268	Developmental kit fabrication
(U) $100	System Program Office support
(U) $4,818	Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0	No activity
(U) $0	Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0	No activity
(U) $0	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	0	5,071	0	0	5,071
(U) Appropriated Value	0	4,921	0	0	4,921
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	0	-103	0	0	-103
b. SBIR	0	0	0	0	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0	0	0	0	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0	0	0	0	0
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	0	0	0	0	-103
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	0	4,818	0	0	4,818

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: OSD directed reductions.

Schedule: None

Technical: None

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) Aircraft Procurement (PE 11113F)	0	0	4,749	22,100	31,300	31,700	20,953	6,779	n/a	117,781

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) Contract award					X
(U) Kit proof								X
(U) System Requirement Review								X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) System Requirement Review	0	150	0	0
(U) Mock-up fabrication	0	300	0	0
(U) Developmental kit proof	0	4,268	0	0
(U) System Program Office support	0	100	0	0
(U) Total	0	4,818	0	0

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Boeing Defense and Space Group Wichita, KS ITT Avionics, Nutley, NJ

FFP FFP

Oct 96 Oct 96

4,418 300

0 0

0 0

4,418 300

0 0

0 0

n/a n/a

4,418 300

Support and Management Organizations

OC-ALC/LH WR-ALC/LKN

50 50

0 0

0 0

50 50

0 0

0 0

n/a n/a

50 50

Test and Evaluation Organizations

419th FLTS Edwards AFB, CA

Project order

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property: None

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4493	B-61 Mod 11 Flight Tests	4,371	594	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4,965

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The program involves development and testing of a modified nuclear weapon on B-52 operational aircraft. Replacement of a strategic weapon was recommended by the Nuclear Posture Review and directed by Presidential Decision Review-30. Congress was notified during the second quarter of FY 1995, of the Department of Defense, and the Department of Energy intent to modify an existing weapon to provide a replacement option. Modifications (made by the Department of Energy) to the B-61 Mod 7 strategic bomb accomplish the mission requirements of the replaced weapon. Modification of an existing weapon is less expensive than the cost to develop a new weapon from "scratch." Flight testing by the 419th FLTS, Edwards AFB, CA is required to certify the modified weapon mass and physic properties are the same as the Mod 7 device. The Air Force asked and received permission from Congress to reprogram the $4.5M FY 96 Congressional plus-up for AGM-130 integration on the B-52, into the B-61 Mod 11 Flight Test program. This program will be completed in FY 97.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $756	Complete 6 Degree of Freedom aerodynamic analysis for release and initial development of flight test characteristics
(U) $981	Complete operational flight tests for Major Assembly Release (MAR) and Aircraft Compatability Control Release Drawing release by DOE
(U) $1,221	Complete aeroballistic and dispersion flight tests and Alaska proof test series for final aerodynamic model development verification of ballistic dispersion/CEP requirement defines in Military Characteristics (MCs)
(U) $1,413	Data analysis and develop new ballistics tables for aircraft operational delivery
(U) $4,371	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $594	Complete data analysis and develop new ballistics tables for aircraft operational delivery
(U) $594	Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0	No activity
(U) $0	Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $0	No activity
(U) $0	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	0	607	0	0	5,100
(U) Appropriated Value	0	607	0	0	5,100
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions	0	0	0	0	0
b. SBIR	0	0	0	0	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram	0	0	0	0	0
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	0	0	0	0	-4,500
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB	4,371	-13	0	0	4,365
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	4,371	594	0	0	4,965

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY 96 Congressional Appropriations added $4.5M for AGM-130 integration. Since Air Combat Command did not have a requirement to integrate the AGM-130 on the B-52 Congress authorized the Air Force to transfer these funds into the B-61 Mod 11 program. Original funding request was for FY97 expenditures. The Air Fore is expending all moneys in FY 97 to complete the program.

Schedule: None

Technical: None

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) not applicable

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) Major Assembly Release test					X
(U) Aeroballistic/Dispersion tests						X	X	X
(U) DOE modification program						X	X	X

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Software development	1,413	594	0	0
(U) Developmental test and evaluation	2,202	0	0	0
(U) Program management support	236	0	0	0
(U) Contractor support	470	0	0	0
(U) Travel	50	0	0	0
(U) Total	4,371	594	0	0

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

San Antonio ALC/Nuc Wpns Integration Division

MIPR

Jan 97

4,965

0

4,371

594

0

0

n/a

4,965

Support and Management Organizations

Test and Evaluation Organizations

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property: None