0204136N -- F/A-18 SQUADRONS

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER &TITLE		FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
E1662 F/A-18 Improvements
		34,526	58,676	47,110	70,188	64,048	58,673	46,429	33,750	0	2,995,607
E2065 F/A-18 RADAR Upgrade
		19,614	20,864	2,330	0	0	0	0	0	0	290,974
E2130 F/A-18 Follow-On Variant
		803,125	343,175	267,536	128,703	61,499	55,376	6,539	5,790	0	5,507,485
TOTAL		857,265	422,715	316,976	198,891	125,547	114,049	52,968	39,540	0	8,794,066
RDT&E Articles				10							10

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 is capable of using external equipment to perform either fighter or attack missions. The capabilities of the F/A-18 weapon system can be upgraded to accommodate and incorporate new or enhanced weapons as well as advances in technology to respond effectively to emerging future threats. Continued development capability is required to successfully optimize new F/A-18 weapon system capabilities in the Fleet. Additionally, continued improvements in reliability and maintainability are necessary to ensure maximum benefit is achieved through reduced cost of ownership and to provide enhanced availability.

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (Continued): The F/A-18 Naval Strike Fighter program transitioned from full-scale engineering development to operational systems development during FY 1983. As F/A-18 squadrons report discrepancies and new requirements, a continuing capability is needed to perform technical evaluations, investigative flight testing, software support, and incorporate Pre-Planned Product Improvements (P³I) (i.e., capability enhancements). The F/A-18 radar (APG-65) has been upgraded to the APG-73 to operate in the projected electronic warfare environment of the 1990's. The follow-on F/A-18 (E/F version) is an airframe upgrade incorporating increased capabilities, performance,and survivability necessary to satisfy the 41% percent increase in range over the C/D in the high-low-low-high attack/interdiction mission carrying three 480 gallon drop tanks, four 1000 pound bombs, and two AIM-9 air-to-air missiles. The E/F version will have increased internal fuel capacity, increased weapons carriage capability, increased carrier recovery payload, enhanced survivability/vulnerability, increased growth capacity, and increased engine thrust. It will retain all of the P³I enhancements developed for the earlier night attack C/D version of the aircraft.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

	PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
	E1662 F/A-18 Improvements
		34,526	58,676	47,110	70,188	64,048	58,673	46,429	33,750	0	2,995,607

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 is a multi-mission strike fighter aircraft that is used in fighter and attack roles through selected use of external equipment (such as external fuel tanks, targeting and navigation Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) pods). The capabilities of the F/A-18 weapon system are being upgraded to accommodate and incorporate new or enhanced weapons including the AMRAAM, Imaging Infrared (I²R) Maverick, Harpoon, and SLAM as well as other advances in technology such as night attack, reconnaissance, enhanced performance engine and radar upgrade to respond effectively to emerging future threats. Continued development capability in terms of software and hardware improvements is required to successfully optimize new F/A-18 weapons system capabilities in the fleet. Continued improvements in reliability and maintainability for the airframe, avionics, and engines are necessary to ensure maximum benefit is achieved through reduced cost of ownership and enhanced availability. As F/A-18 squadrons report system problems and requirements, a continuing capability is needed to perform technical evaluations, investigative flight testing, software support, and incorporate capability enhancements.

A.(U) Program Accomplishments and Plans:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($8,013) Continued to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, weapons, and subsystems). Continued to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action. Commenced development of Digital Communications System (DCS) and Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS).

(U) ($11,206) Continued to conduct engineering analysis and development improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during deployment of the aircraft. Provided technical support for the integration of new weapons and systems.

(U) ($14,886) Continued development and flight test of the Positive Identification System (PIDS) for combat identification.

(U) ($421) Funded trade study to support Generation III TFLIR development.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($33,941) Continue to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, weapons, and subsystems). Continue to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action. Continue development of PIDS for combat identification and JHMCS.

(U) ($4,000) Continue to conduct engineering analysis and development improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during deployment of the aircraft. Provide technical support for the integration of new weapons and systems.

(U) ($1,305) Provide technical support, integration testing and engineering analysis for PIDS and JHMCS. Plan procurement and continue development of DCS.

(U) ($18,000) Commence engineering design for integration of BOL Chaff Dispenser (LAU-138) into the F/A-18.

(U) ($1,430) Portion of program reserved for the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($2,026) Continue to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, weapons, and subsystems). Continue to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action.

(U) ($3,976) Continue to conduct engineering analysis and development improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during deployment of the aircraft. Provide technical support for the integration of new weapons and systems.

(U) ($41,108) Continue development of DCS, PIDS and JHMCS. Begin development of Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (TFLIR) System.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($4,982) Continue to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, weapons, and subsystems). Continue to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action.

(U) ($7,000) Continue to conduct engineering analysis and development improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during deployment of the aircraft. Provide technical support for the integration of new weapons and systems.

(U) ($58,206) Continue development of DCS, PIDS, JHMCS and TFLIR.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

		FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:		45,117	43,105	43,248	28,151
(U) Appropriated amount:			61,105
(U) Adjustments from President's Budget:		-10,591	+15,571	+3,862	+42,037
(U) FY 1998/99 President's Budget Submit:		34,526	58,676	47,110	70,188

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

B. Funding: The net decrease of -$10,591 thousand in FY 1996 reflects the BOL Chaff rescission and a reprioritization of requirements within the Department of Navy. The net increase of +15,571 thousand in FY 1997 provides for integration of the BOL Chaff System (LAU-138) into the F/A-18 and minor program adjustments. The net increases of +3,862 thousand in FY 1998 and +$42,037 thousand in FY 1999 provide for development of the Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (TFLIR) System and various minor program adjustments.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

		FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
	F/A-18 C/D
	QTY	18	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,027
	APN-1	794,501	273,159	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,740,213
	APN-5	76,381	146,296	156,213	278,642	374,219	259,515	212,283	202,193	Cont.	Cont.
	APN-6	5,605	9,586	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	133,345

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0207163N - Advanced Medium Range Air-To-Air Missile (AMRAAM)

(U) PE 0604727N - Joint Stand-off Weapon (JSOW) System

(U) PE 0604270N - EW Development

(U) PE 0305141D - BQH Communications

(U) PE 0604777N - Navigation ID System, project X0921, NAVSTAR GPS equipment

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not Applicable.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Contracts	22,549	40,265	37,305	56,675
b. In-House	3,897	13,339	5,281	7,782
c. Test & Evaluation	8,080	3,642	4,524	5,731
d. SBIR Assessment		1,430
Total	34,526	58,676	47,110	70,188

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands):

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS:

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
MDA	SS/CPFF/FFP	3,7,9/93	1,565	1,565	1,565	0	0	0	0	0	1,565
MDA	SS/CPFF/FFP	12/93	101,557	101,557	34,050	16,549	17,400	13,705	14,975	4,878	101,557
St. Louis, MO
Rockwell-Collins	SS/FFP	7/96	22,365	22,365	0	6,000	7,365	5,800	3,200	0	22,365
Cedar Rapids, IA
TBD (TFLIR)	TBD	12/97	TBD	186,317	0	0	0	14,800	36,500	135,017	186,317
TBD (BOL CHAFF)	TBD	3/97	TBD	13,500	0	0	13,500	0	0	0	13,500
Other Contracts	Var	Var	3,719	3,719	3,719	0	0	0	0	0	3,719
WPAFB	MIPR	12/97	8,000	8,000	0	0	2,000	3,000	2,000	1,000	8,000
Dayton OH
NAWC China Lake	WX	11/97	55,426	55,426	17,145	2,078	12,003	3,900	6,300	14,000	55,426
Other Field Activities	WX	11/97	4,354	4,354	0	672	411	306	407	2,558	4,354
Support and Management
Field Activities	Var	11/97	6,429	6,429	2,207	1,147	925	1,075	1,075	0	6,429
Test and Evaluation
NAWC Pax River	Var	11/97	79,641	79,641	12,217	8,080	3,642	4,524	5,731	45,447	79,641
SBIR Assessment							1,430				1,430

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Delivery Date	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development				N/A
Support and Management				N/A
Test and Evaluation				N/A

>

				Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Product Development				56,479	25,299	52,679	41,511	63,382	157,453	396,803
Subtotal Support and Management				2,207	1,147	925	1,075	1,075	0	6,429
Subtotal Test and Evaluation				12,217	8,080	3,642	4,524	5,731	45,447	79,641
SBIR						1,430				1,430
FY92 & Prior			2,511,304							2,511,304
Total Project			2,511,304	70,903	34,526	58,676	47,110	70,188	202,900	2,995,607

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
E2065 F/A-18 Radar Upgrade
	19,614	20,864	2,330	0	0	0	0	0	0	290,974

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 radar (AN/APG-65), requires an upgrade to improve Electronic Counter-Countermeasure (ECCM) performance against improved threat Electronic Countermeasures (ECM). This threat ECM improvement has partially resulted from compromises in the F/A-18 radar performance against various threat electronic warfare systems. The AN/APG-73 radar follows and capitalizes on AN/APG-70 and AN/APG-71 developmental and value engineer-ing programs to maximize Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) commonality. A Pre-planned Product Improvement (P³I) Phase II program will develop improved hardware and software for an all-weather Reconnaissance (RECCE) strip map and spotlight modes.

A. (U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U)($13,164) Phase I: Achieved Initial Operational Capability, obtained Milestone III approval and began Full Rate Production. Phase II: Continued development efforts; commenced Development testing. Commenced Radar Upgrade (RUG) Phase II unique integration efforts into Tactical Reconnaissance (TAC RECCE) System.

(U) ($6,450) Continued in-house engineering support.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($14,431) Complete Phase II hardware and software Design and Development. Prepare for Validation and Verification/Technical Evaluation.

(U) ($5,894) Perform RUG Phase II integration testing and engineering analysis for the Radar Upgrade Program.

Continue in-house engineering support. Complete TAC RECCE/Rug Phase II integration.

(U) ($539) Portion of program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($2,330) Conduct RUG Phase II Follow-on Test and Evaluation.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN: Not Applicable.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:	21,901	21,766	2,539	0
(U) Appropriated amount:		21,766
(U) Adjustments from President's Budget:	-2,287	-902	-209	0
(U) FY 1998/99 President's Budget Submit:	19,614	20,864	2,330	0

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

D. Funding: The FY 1996 reduction of -$2,287 thousand, the FY 1997 reduction of -$902 thousand and the FY 1998 reduction of -$209 thousand are Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and minor balancing adjustments.

(U) Schedule: FY 1997 President's Budget input error: Rug Phase II FOT&E is scheduled to commence in 3Q/FY98 vice 1Q/FY97.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
(U) PROCUREMENT:
F/A-18 RADAR UPGRADE
(U) APN-1
C/D	44,937	14,270	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	468,303
E/F	0	32,997	58,917	83,829	127,095	129,420	131,508	132,515	2,436,167	3,132,448
(U) APN-5 (RADAR)
	8,210	7,784	32,236	19,913	31,902	22,504	92,297	91,920	39,127	365,692
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0603261N Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance (TAC RECCE)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	To Complete
Program Milestones	4Q/MS III PH I 4Q/IOC PH I
Engineering Milestones
T&E Milestones	4Q95-3Q96/OT-IIC PH I		1Q-2Q/TECHEVAL PH II 3Q/FOT&E PH II
Contract Milestones	1Q/LRIP IV 4Q/FRP PH I

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Contracts	13,035	14,431	0	0
b. In-House	671	619	700	0
c. Test & Evaluation	5,908	5,275	1,630	0
d. SBIR Assessment		539
Total	19,614	20,864	2,330	0

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
MDA (RUG PH I) St. Louis, MO	SS/LTR(FPIF)	4/90	170,903	170,903	170,903	0	0	0	0	0	170,903
MDA (RUG PH II)	CPIF	3/95	54,000	54,000	35,534	4,035	14,431	0	0	0	54,000
(RUG PH II) (INTEG) St. Louis, MO	CPFF	11/95	11,000	11,000	2,000	9,000	0	0	0	0	11,000
Support and Management
In-House Support
Rail	T&M	9/94	2,844	2,844	854	671	619	700	0	0	2,844
Test and Evaluation
NAWC China Lake	WX	11/97	37,754	37,754	25,629	5,590	4,905	1,630	0	0	37,754
Other Field Activities	Var	Var	4,798	4,798	4,110	318	370	0	0	0	4,798
SBIR Assessment							539				539

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Delivery Date	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
GFP/Munitions	FFP	N/A	N/A	9,136	0	0	0	0	0	9,136
Support and Management			N/A
Test and Evaluation			N/A

	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Product Development	217,573	13,035	14,431	0	0	0	245,039
Subtotal Support and Management	854	671	619	700	0	0	2,844
Subtotal Test and Evaluation	29,739	5,908	5,275	1,630	0	0	42,552
SBIR Assessment			539				539
Total Project	248,166	19,614	20,864	2,330	0	0	290,974

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
E2130 F/A-18 Follow-On Variant
		343,175	267,536	128,703	61,499	55,376	6,539	5,790	0	5,507,485
RDT&E Articles
	10							10

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 is a twin-engine, mid-wing, multi-mission, tactical aircraft employed in Navy and Marine Corps strike fighter squadrons. The F/A-18, through selected use of external equipment is designed for flexibility in fighter, attack, fleet air defense, and close air support roles. The F/A-18 E/F variant is an upgrade to the night attack "C" and "D" models. The F/A-18 E/F will be the second major upgrade since the program's inception. The F/A-18 E/F incorporates modifications to the air vehicle to increase mission radius, payload flexibility, improve survivability, increase carrier recovery payload and growth potential. This will allow the F/A-18 to continue to adapt its strike fighter role to evolving threats into the next century. The F/A-18 E/F E&MD program is under a Congressional mandated cost cap of $4.883B FY90 dollars. Pre-development effort of $36.6M in FY90 base year dollars, previously funded under the F/A-18 C/D program, is reflected in the RDT&E total, but is not included in the approved $4.883B development cap.

A. (U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($689,383) Continued engineering and manufacturing design activity leading to the development of the airframe and engine. Began flight test.

(U) ($62,104) Continued to plan and develop ground test support for integration, test and evaluation. Finalized phased pricing for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). Began aircraft delivery acceptance. Completed DT-IIA.

(U) ($0 - Funded within APN) Procured long lead materials for LRIP. Began LRIP.

(U) ($51,638) Started drop test. Began developmental flight test. Continued to procure Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) required for developmental effort.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($281,659) Continue engineering and manufacturing design activity leading to the development of the airframe and engine.

(U) ($20,989) Continue to plan and develop ground test support for integration and test and evaluation. Complete Milestone IIIA. Continue aircraft delivery acceptance.

(U) ($32,793) Continue developmental flight test. Commence DT-IIB and begin fatigue testing. Continue to procure GFE items required for developmental effort.

(U) ($7,734) Portion of program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($115,156) Continue engineering and manufacturing design activity in support of developmental flight test. Complete engine Full Production Qualification.

(U) ($25,010) Continue to develop ground test support for integration and test and evaluation. Complete DT-IIB and OT-IIA.

(U) ($120,370) Continue developmental flight testing. Continue to procure GFE items required for developmental effort.

(U) ($7,000) Continue Test Program Set (TPS) development.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($45,733) Continue engineering and manufacturing design activity in support of developmental flight test. Complete DT-IID.

(U) ($21,102) Continue ground testing support for integration, test and evaluation.

(U) ($54,868) Continue developmental flight testing. Continue to procure GFE items required for developmental effort. Conduct OT-IIC.

(U) ($7,000) Continue Test Program Set (TPS) development.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:	820,411	360,462	157,042	123,153
(U) Appropriated amount:		358,262
(U) Adjustments from President's Budget:	-17,286	-17,287	+110,494	+5,550
(U) FY 1998/99 President's Budget Submit:	803,125	343,175	267,536	128,703

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The net reduction of -$17,286 thousand in FY 1996 reflects the Jordanian Rescission, SBIR assessment, and minor program adjustments. The net decrease of -$17,287 thousand in FY 1997 is comprised of Congressional general reductions, Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) and balancing adjustments. The net increase of +110,494 thousand in FY 1998 represents funding required to maintain the F/A-18 E/F Variant Engineering and Manufacturing Development Program schedule (+$111M), development of Test Program Sets (+$7M) and various other program adjustments (-$8M). The net increase of +$5,550 thousand in FY 1999 consists of NWCF and balancing adjustments

(-$1.450) along with funding to continue TPS development (+$7M).

(U) Schedule: Operational Assessment was completed in the third quarter of 1996. It was incorrectly identified in the 1997 President's Budget as being completed in the second quarter of 1996. Engine Full Power Qualification (FPQ) will be delayed by one quarter due to a high pressure turbine design modification required as a result of Low Power Qualification (LPQ) test information. Navy Program Reviews (NPRs) and LRIP Contract Awards were added to the budget exhibit. Test milestones DT-IIB, DT-IID, OT-IIA (TECHEVAL) and OT-IIC(OPEVAL) were added to the budget exhibit based on the Test and Evaluation Master Plan.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
(U) PROCUREMENT:
(U) A/C QTY
	0	12	20	30	48	50	50	50	740	1000
(U) APN1
	233,633	2,094,821	2,191,575	3,034,356	4,133,751	3,654,137	3,502,129	3,462,738	50,291,601	72,598,741
(U) APN6
	0	79,965	69,772	111,472	61,776	88,790	93,396	57,929	822,252	1,385,352
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0207163N (AMRAAM)
(U) PE 0604727N (Joint Standoff Weapon System)(JSOW)
(U) PE 0604270N (EW Development)
(U) PE 0604777N (Navigation/ID System)
(U) PE 0305141D (Joint UAV)
(U) PE 0603261N (Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance)
(U) PE 0204163N (Fleet Communications)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	To Complete
Program Milestones	2Q/NPR	2Q/NPR 2Q/MS-IIIA	2Q/NPR	2Q/NPR	2Q/00 MS-III
Engineering Milestones	3Q96-1Q97/ Operational Assessment		2Q/Eng FPQ
T&E Milestones	1Q/1st Flt 1Q96-1Q97/DT-IIA	1Q97-1Q98/DT-IIB	1Q/OT-IIA	1Q99-2Q99/DT-IID (TECHEVAL) 3Q99-1Q00/OT-IIC (OPEVAL)
Contract Milestones	3Q/LRIP-1 Long Lead	3Q/LRIP-2 Long Lead	3Q/LRIP-3 Long Lead	3Q/LRIP-4 Long Lead	2Q/00 FRP

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Contract	696,100	211,245	160,900	45,873
b. Support Contract	12,014	6,251	3,127	1,300
c. In-House	92,247	115,726	102,509	80,530
d. GFE/Other	2,764	2,219	1,000	1,000
e. SBIR Assessment		7,734
Total	803,125	343,175	267,536	128,703

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands):

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS:

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
MDA St.Louis, MO	SS/CPFF SS/CPIF/AF	3/92 7/92	81,785 3,805,637	81,785 3,805,637	81,785 2,784,644	619,300	157,700	133,600	45,873	64,520	81,785 3,805,637
GE Lynn, MA	SS/CPFF SS/CPIF/AF	3/92 7/92	51,500 799,667	51,500 799,667	51,500 645,367	76,000	51,000	27,300	0	0	51,500 799,667
Hughes LA, Calif	SS/CPFF	9/93	4,365	4,365	1,020	800	2,545	0	0	0	4,365
Other Contracts	Var	Var	20,214	20,214	20,214	0	0	0	0	0	20,214
NAWC Warminster	Var	11/97	36,751	36,751	19,651	6,700	6,300	4,100	0	0	36,751
NAWC China Lake	Var	11/97	57,410	57,410	18,210	16,000	13,000	5,200	5,000	0	57,410
NAWC Lakehurst	Var	11/97	27,994	27,994	18,794	6,500	2,100	400	200	0	27,994
NADEP North Island	Var	11/97	10,036	10,036	6,886	2,400	750	0	0	0	10,036
NAWC Indianapolis	Var	11/97	6,967	1,700	500	1,700	0	0	10,867
Other Field Activities	Var	Var	39,830	39,830	21,553	2,847	1,109	14,021	300	0	39,830

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS (CONT.):

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Support and Management
Rail Co. Towson, MD	T&M	9/94	17,452	17,452	3,830	4,822	4,900	2,600	1,300	0	17,452
Misc Contracts	Var	11/97	12,370	12,370	7,639	4,216	412	103	0	0	12,370
Field Activities	11/97	21,043	21,043	16,704	2,976	939	424	0	0	21,043
Test and Evaluation
NAWC Pax River	Var	11/97	278,498	278,498	22,913	47,800	82,200	64,900	37,067	23,618	278,498
Arnold Engineering Development Center
Tulahoma, TN	MIPR	1/97	25,392	25,392	17,392	6,500	1,500	0	0	0	25,392
NAWC China Lake	Var		79,029	79,029	0	0	0	0	37,963	41,066	79,029
Other Field Activities	Var	Var	27,730	27,730	5,475	1,800	8,267	12,188	0	0	27,730
SBIR							7,734				7,734

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY:

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/ Oblig Date	Delivery Date	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
GFE/Other	FFP	Var	Var	85,198	2,764	2,219	1,000	1,000	0	92,181
Support and Management				N/A
Test and Evaluation				N/A
Subtotal Product Development				3,761,789	735,011	237,223	187,321	52,373	64,520	5,038,237
Subtotal Support and Management				28,173	12,014	6,251	3,127	1,300	0	50,865
Subtotal Test and Evaluation				45,780	56,100	91,967	77,088	75,030	64,684	410,649
SBIR Assessment						7,734				7,734
Total Project				3,835,742	803,125	343,175	267,536	128,703	129,204	5,507,485