0604567N Ship Contract Design

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
F2199 New Design SSN	9,053	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	138,831
S1803 Ship Contract Design	9,224	3,958	51,720	80,941	125,604	144,007	230,438	192,295	CONT.	CONT.
S2197 Ship Specifications	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293	1,317	1,293	1,412	4,104	CONT.	CONT.
S2198 Live Fire Test and Evaluation	0	88	3,831	8,826	7,666	1,521	4,238	3,383	CONT.	CONT.
S2301 Carrier Contract Design	0	0	17,866	34,844	50,664	47,777	52,600	47,745	CONT.	CONT.
S2302 Carrier Live Fire Test and Evaluation	0	0	0	0	10,813	13,920	10,000	0	CONT.	34,733
TOTAL	20,881	6,804	75,713	125,904	196,064	208,518	298,688	247,527	CONT.	CONT.

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program element (PE) directly supports the Navy's Shipbuilding Plan by providing for the development of all post Preliminary Design (through FY 1996) and all post Milestone (MS) I (FY 1997 and out) engineering, programmatic and acquisition documentation, including ship specifications and contractual documents, associated with the acquisition of Navy ships. Modern day ship design and acquisition processes do not separate Preliminary Design from Contract Design. These are seamless design activities and are both conducted between MS I and II. This line also supports the New Attack Submarine (New SSN) Contract Design and the Future Carrier (CVX) Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD).

(A) Contract Design has traditionally been the engineering development of the technical and contractual definition of the ship design (including ship specifications and drawings) to a level of detail sufficient for prospective shipbuilders to make a

sound estimate of the construction cost and schedule. Additionally, the contract design package developed under this PE has provided the technical baseline from which the Navy selects the shipbuilder who then develops the detail design package required to support the construction and eventual delivery of the ship. This PE also supports the development of design methodologies which facilitate and optimize the transition from ship design documents to efficient production of new ships and ship conversions, and supports engineering planning and ship affordability studies. This PE also supports Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) of new ship designs.

(U) Under Acquisition Reform for new design ships and submarines , traditional distinct phasing of the design process has been replaced with a continuous concurrent engineering Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) process extending through and after contract award. This serves to maintain the focus of multi-discipline teams consisting of the government, shipbuilder, system programs, and suppliers. Government/Industry Integrated Product Team(s) (IPTs) will utilize the IPPD process to develop the design in an Integrated Product and Data Environment (IPDE). The design approach is part of an acquisition strategy that is based on commercial practices and incorporates a phased technical definition.

(U) For the Future Carrier (CVX), Government/Industry Integrated Product Team(s) will utilize the IPPD process to develop industry sea-based tactical aviation platform design(s) to a level of detail sufficient for prospective shipbuilders to produce the most effective, affordable product achievable in the most efficient manner. This PE also supports Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) for the Future Carrier (CVX) program.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development of new end-items prior to production approval decision.

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
S1803 Ship Contract Design	9,224	3,958	51,720	80,941	125,604	144,007	230,438	192,295	CONT.	CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program supports the development of all technical, programmatic, and contractual documentation required after Preliminary Design (through FY 1996) and after MS I (FY 1997 and out) for the acquisition of the ships in the Navy's Shipbuilding Program. The major effort is the engineering development of the technical and contractual definition of the ship design (e.g., ship specifications and drawings), with sufficient details for the prospective shipbuilder to make a sound estimate of construction cost and schedule. It also serves as the contractual technical definition from which the selected builder develops the shipbuilding detail design and testing package required to build and deliver the ship.

(B) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($9,224) Completed LPD 17 Contract Design.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($ 340) Commence AOE SLE Contract Design. (10/96-7/97)

(U) ($3,618) BTR to PE 0603564, S0408 for SC 21/AOE(X) feasibility study efforts.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($ 550) Continue AOE SLE Contract Design. (10/97-7/98)

(U) ($21,000) Begin implementation of an Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) structure and Integrated Product Teams (IPT) to incorporate a Total System Engineering (TSE) approach to the advanced design and development of SC 21 systems. The TSE approach will include efforts in the areas of development of hull form concepts, survivability, modeling and simulation, manning, integrated topside design, integrated logistics support and C4I design. (10/97-9/98)

(U) ($10,000) Begin to develop system specifications to define the most cost effective approach for design of the 21st Century Surface Combatant (SC-21). Begin technology assessment efforts to determine system design impacts/flexibility required to enable future upgrades and cost effective enhancement of capabilities. (10/97-9/98)

(U) ($11,000) Begin ship design and integration studies for SC-21 HM&E, main propulsion unit, integrated power systems, and other auxiliary propulsion plant components. (10/97-9/98)

(U) ($9,170) Begin design and engineering development of a computational plant architecture testbed leading to the ships information system for the SC-21 family of ships. This system will provide survivable, common open architecture for HM&E, combat systems, C4I and administrative elements and will be designed with the flexibility to be incorporated into future surface ships. (10/97-9/98)

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($ 2,300) Continue AOE SLE Contract Design. (10/98-7/99)

(U) ($26,801) Continue implementation of IPPD structure and IPT's to support the Total Ship Engineering (TSE) approach to design and construction of SC 21. Continue TSE efforts for development and demonstration of hull form concepts, survivability, survivability, integrated topside design, integrated logistics support and C4I. (10/98-9/99)

(U) ($12,000) Complete system specifications to support the design of the SC 21 lead ship. Review the system specification package in order to begin planning for an Request for Proposal (RFP) for the contract design of the lead ship. (10/98-9/99)

(U) ($15,000) Complete ship design and integration studies for the SC 21 HM&E, main propulsion unit, integrated power systems, and other auxiliary propulsion plant components and begin demonstration and test to support the design effort. (10/98-9/99)

(U) ($15,000) Continue design and engineering development, and begin demonstration and testing to support the design effort for the computational plant architecture leading to the ships information system for SC-21. (10/98-9/99)

(U) ($4,000) Begin technology transition and integration efforts for systems which will be incorporated into the SC 21 lead ship. Review development schedules and timelines to ensure that technical risk is properly managed and equipment will be tested prior to delivery to the shipbuilders. Begin industry involvement to assess Independent Research and Development (IRAD) efforts and emerging technologies in the commercial sector. (10/98-9/99)

(U) ($ $5,840) Begin AOE(X) Contract Design. (10/98-9/99)

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:	5,347	4,256	30,254	42,124
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG:	+3,877	-298	+21,466	+38,817
(U) FY 1998/99 PRESBUDG Submit	9,224	3,958	51,720	80,941

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 1996 increase reflects additional LPD 17 funding. FY 1997 decrease due to minor pricing adjustments. FY 1998 and FY 1999 increases due to SC 21 and AOE(X) requirements.

(U) Schedule: The current SCN Plan is as follows:

LPD 17	FY 1996
New Design SSN	FY 1998
AOE SLE	FY 2000
CVN 77	FY 2002
SC 21	FY 2003
AOE (X)	FY 2003
LHA/LH(X)	FY 2005
Command Ship	FY 2005
CV(X)	FY 2006
MCS(X)	FY 2007

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(A) PE 0603564N (Ship Preliminary Design/Feasibility Studies)

(B) (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
Program Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Engineering Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
T&E Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Contract Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

PROJECT COST CATEGORIES	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Systems Engineering	8,994	312	21,000	33,500
b. Program Management Support	180	22	1,500	1,341
c. Travel	50	6	50	100
d. BTR to PE 0603564N	0	3,618	0	0
e. Technology Assessments/Integration	0	0	2,000	4,000
f. HM&E, Main Prop., Aux Sys Studies	0	0	11,000	15,000
g. Computational Plant Architecture	0	0	9,170	15,000
h. System Specifications/RFP Development	0	0	7,000	12,000
Total	9,224	3,958	51,720	80,941

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
JJMA Arlington, Va.	C	3/95	Cont.	Cont.	1,652*	1,500	3,953***	1,345	2,718	Cont.	Cont.
AME Arlington, Va.	C	3/95	Cont.	Cont.	2,578*	2,570	0	0	2,636	Cont.	Cont.
CD-NSWC Carderock, MD.	WR	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	2,376*	500	0	6,500	8,000	Cont.	Cont.
PNSY Phila, PA.	WR	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	0*	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
NAVAIR Arlington, VA.	WR	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	550*	700	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
NNS&DDCo Newport News, VA.	SS/C	Var.	11,702	11,150	302*	0	0	250	0	0	11,702
SPAWAR Arlington, VA.	PD	Var.	Cont.	Cont.	800*	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
TRW Fairfax, VA.	C	3/91	Cont.	Cont.	884*	1091	0	0	0	0	Cont.
Gibbs&Cox Arlington, VA.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,800	2,500	Cont.	Cont.
DD-NSWC Dahlgren, VA.	WR	A.N.	Cont.	Cont.	300	380	0	9,000	10,000	Cont.	Cont.
NRL Washington, DC.	WR	A.N.	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	3,300	2,500	Cont.	Cont.

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
NCCOSC/NRAD San Diego, CA.	WR	A.N.	Cont.	Cont.	50	50	0	7,000	8,000	Cont.	Cont.
APL/JHU Laurel, MD.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,000	1,500	Cont.	Cont.
Mitre Corp. Arlington, VA.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,000	1,500	Cont.	Cont.
Bath Iron Works Bath, ME.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	250	0	Cont.	Cont.
Ingalls Pascagoula, MS.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	250	0	Cont.	Cont.
Avondale New Orleans, LA.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	250	0	Cont.	Cont.
National Steel San Diego, CA.	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	250	0	Cont.	Cont.
C/S Integrators TBD	C	9/97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	12,095	33,590	Cont.	Cont.
Misc.	Var.	Var.	Cont.	Cont.	4,811	2,253	0	5,730	6,497	Cont.	Cont.
Support and Management
Misc.	Var.	Var.	Cont.	Cont.	668*	180	5	1,700	1,500	Cont.	Cont.

Test and Evaluation - None.

* Amounts reflected are FY 95 only. This project has been funded for an extended number of years and dollar amounts for FYs prior to FY 89 are unknown.

** As Needed

*** $3.618M planned for BTR to PE0603564N

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development None
Support and Management None
Test and Evaluation None

			Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Product Development			14,303*	9,044	3,953	50,020	79,441	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Support and Management			668*	180	5	1,700	1,500	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Test and Evaluation			0*	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
Total Project			14,971*	9,224	3,958	51,720	80,941	Cont.	Cont.

Amounts reflected are FY 95 only. This project has been funded for an extended number of years and dollar amounts for FYs prior to FY 89 are unknown.

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
S2197 Ship Specifications	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293	1,317	1,293	1,412	4,104	CONT.	CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project funds the development, implementation and integration of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems to improve the transition from the Navy's Contract Design to the shipbuilder's detail design and production. This project also funds development, improvement and update of NAVSEA cognizant acquisition specifications including integration of Federal and Military Specifications, Handbooks General Specifications for Ships of the U.S. Navy and COTS equipment/systems into a Performance Based, bidable ship contract design acquisition package. These documents are required to reflect the latest technologies (e.g. open systems architecture for information and power systems), manufacturing techniques, environmental requirements, hazardous material reduction, safety and legal/Congressional requirements.

A. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($800) Continued to develop, improve and update NAVSEA cognizant acquisition specifications. Continued development of Specification data base and Open Systems Architecture.

(U)($1,804) Continued development of CAD II analysis programs and program integration. Continued development of CAD II ship design systems and modeling techniques for application on SC 21 and AOE(X).

3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($ 300) Continue to develop, improve and update NAVSEA cognizant acquisition specifications. Continue development of Specification data base and Open Systems Architecture. (10/96-7/97)

(U) ($1,713) Continue development of CAD II analysis programs, program integration and development of CAD II ship design systems and modeling techniques for application on SC 21 and AOE(X). (10/96-7/97)

(U) ($ 675) Forward financing FY 1998 requirements due to low execution rates.

(U) ($ 70) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovative Research Assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C 638.

4. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($ 500) Continue to develop, improve and update NAVSEA cognizant acquisition specifications. Continue development of Specification data base and Open Systems Architecture. (10/97-7/98)

(U) ($ 994) Continue development of CAD II analysis programs and program integration. Continue development of CAD II ship design systems and modeling techniques for application on SC 21 and AOE(X). (10/97-7/98)

(U) ($ 802) Commence development of Performance Based Ship Acquisition Specification Program. (10/97-7/98)

1. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($ 500) Continue to develop, improve and update NAVSEA cognizant acquisition specifications. Continue development of Specification data base and Open Systems Architecture. (10/98-7/99)

(U) ($ 793) Continue development of Performance Based Ship Acquisition Specification Program. (10/98-7/99)

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:	2,656	2,875	4,122	5,307
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG:	-52	-117	-1,826	-4,014
(U) FY 1998/FY 1999 PRESBUDG Submit	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

Funding: Decrease in FY 1996/7 reflects minor pricing adjustments. FY 1998 decrease reflects incorporation of

revised Program requirements and a reduction for low execution rate in FY 1996. FY 1999 decrease reflects incorporation of revised program requirements.

(U) Schedule: The current SCN Plan is as follows:

LPD 17(L(X))	FY 1996
New Design SSN	FY 1998
AOE SLE	FY 2000
CVN 77	FY 2002
SC 21	FY 2003
AOE(X)	FY 2003
LHA/LH(X),	FY 2005
Command Ship	FY 2005
CV(X)	FY 2006
MCS(X)	FY 2007

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

FY 1998/FY 1999 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
DATE: February 1997

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 5
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604567N
PROJECT NUMBER: S2197

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Ship Contract Design/Live Fire T&E
PROJECT TITLE: Ship Specifications

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0603564N (Ship Preliminary Design/Feasibility Studies)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
Program Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Engineering Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
T&E Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Contract Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

PROJECT COST CATEGORIES	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. CAD Systems Engineering	1,804	1,888	1,296	400
b. CAD Software Development	500	500	500	100
c. Specification Improvements	300	300	500	793
d. SBIR Assessment	0	70	0	0
Total	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development
SPCC Mechanicsburg,Pa.	WR	A.N.*	Cont.	Cont.	1,540*	1,270	1,000	730	200	Cont.	Cont.
JJMA Arlington, Va.	C	2/95	Cont.	Cont.	1,075*	596	883	700	500	Cont.	Cont.
AME Arlington, Va.	C	2/95	Cont.	Cont.	2,187*	589	250	300	500	Cont.	Cont.
CD-NSWC Carderock, MD.	WR	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	210*	0	75	75	69	Cont.	Cont.
PSNSY Pudget Sound,WA	WR	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	480*	0	0	0	0
Misc.	Var.	A.N.**	Cont.	Cont.	1,120*	149	550	491	24	Cont.	Cont.
Support and Management None
Test and Evaluation None

* Amounts reflected are FY 95 only. This project has been funded for an extended number of years and dollar amounts for FYs prior to FY 89 are unknown.

** As Needed

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

None

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development None
Support and Management None
Test and Evaluation None

* As Needed

			Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Product Development			6,613*	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Support and Management			0*	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Test and Evaluation			0*	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
Total Project			6,613	2,604	2,758	2,296	1,293	Cont.	Cont.

* Amounts reflected are FY 95 only. This project has been funded for an extended number of years and dollar amounts for FYs prior to FY 89 are unknown.

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ACTUAL	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
S2198 Live Fire Test & Evaluation	0	88	3,831	8,826	7,666	1,521	4,238	3,383	CONT.	CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project specifically responds to the Congressionally mandated Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) legislation which requires realistic survivability testing be conducted under all major acquisition programs before production approval is granted. Evaluations concerning the vulnerability and lethality of ships against known threat systems will be conducted using analytical prediction techniques and model testing.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Not applicable.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

I. (U) ($ 88) BTR to PE 0603564 S0408 for SC 21 preliminary design efforts.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

II. (U) ($ 3,831) Commence SC 21 Live Fire Test and Evaluation. (10/97-9/98)

5. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

III. (U) ($ 7,876) Continue SC 21 Live Fire Test and Evaluation. (10/98-9/99)

IV. (U) ($ 950) Commence AOE(X) Live Fire Test and Evaluation. (10/98-9/99)

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:	0	90	3,848	7,884
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG:	0	-2	-17	+942
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submit:	0	88	3,831	8,826

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(A) Funding: Funding decreases in FY 1997/8 is due to minor program adjustments. Funding increases in FY 1999 is due to addition of AOE(X) testing.

(U) Schedule: The current SCN Plan is as follows:

LPD 17(L(X))	FY 1996
New Design SSN	FY 1998
AOE SLE	FY 2000
CVN 77	FY 2002
AOE(X)	FY 2003
SC 21	FY 2003
LHA/LH(X)	FY 2005
Command Ship	FY 2005
CV(X)	FY 2006
MCS(X)	FY 2007

(U) Technical: Not applicable

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0603564N (Ship Preliminary Design/Feasibility Studies)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
Program Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Engineering Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
T&E Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Contract Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

PROJECT COST CATEGORIES	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Develop LFT&E Test Models	0	0	1,400	3,000
a. Threat Analysis Development	0	0	1,400	2,326
b. Test Procedure Development	0	0	831	3,000
c. Program Support	0	0	200	500
c. BTR	0	88	0	0
Total	0	88	3,831	8,826

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Test and Evaluation
Misc.	Var.	A.N.*	Cont.	Cont.	990	0	88**	3,631	8,326	Cont.	Cont.
Support and Management
TBD					0	0	0	200	500	Cont.	Cont.
Product Development None

+ FY 95 only, this is a continuing program.

* As Needed

**Planned for BTR to PE 0603564

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

None

Item Description	Contract Method/Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development None
Support and Management None
Test and Evaluation None

9900

			Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Test and Evaluation			0	88	3,631	8,326	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Support and Management			0	0	200	500	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Product Development			0	0	0	0	0	Cont.	Cont.
Total Project			990	0	88	3,831	8,826	Cont.	Cont.

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE	FY 1996 ACTUAL	FY 1997 ACTUAL	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	FY 2002 ESTIMATE	FY 2003 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
S2301 Carrier Contract Design	0	0	17,866	34,844	50,664	47,777	52,600	47,745	CONT.	CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project encompasses the design efforts for the CVN 77 and CVX Contract Design. The traditional distinct phasing of the design process for aircraft carriers has been replaced with a continuous concurrent engineering Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) process extending through and after contract award. This serves to maintain the focus of multi-discipline teams consisting of the government, shipbuilder, aviation programs, and suppliers. Government/Industry Integrated Product Team(s) (IPTs) will utilize the IPPD process to develop the design in an Integrated Product and Data Environment (IPDE). The design approach is part of an acquisition strategy that is based on commercial practices and incorporates a phased technical definition.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Not applicable.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN: Not applicable.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($17,866) Commence CVN 77 Contract Design. (10/97-6/98)

5. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($34,844) Continue CVN 77 Contract Design. (10/98-6/99)

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: 0

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget:*	0	0	5,000	10,000
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG:
0	+12,866	+24,844
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission
0	0	17,866	34,844

* Was part of S1803

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: Funding added by Flag Board in FY 1998 and FY 1999 to commence CVN77 Contract Design.

(U) Schedule: CVN 77 is scheduled for FY 2002. CV(X) is scheduled for FY 2006.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0603512N (Carrier Systems Development)

(U) PE 0603564N (Ship Feasibility Studies)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
Program Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Engineering Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
T&E Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.
Contract Milestones	See Individual Ship Acquisition Program Documentation.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

PROJECT COST CATEGORIES	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
a. Trade-off Analysis	0	0	4,963	5,359
b. Integration Assessments	0	0	12,903	12,509
c. Design and Integrate Selected Changes	0	0	0	14,297
Prepare Contract Package	0	0	0	2,679
Total	0	0	17,866	34,844

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Government Performing Activity	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
ADVANCED MARINE ENTERPRISES	PR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,637	3,085	Cont.	Cont.
GEORGE G. SHARP	PR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,473	2,776	Cont.	Cont.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION	PR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	2,291	4,318	Cont.	Cont.
NSWC - CARDEROCK	WR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,964	3,701	Cont.	Cont.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING	WR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	7,529	14,188	Cont.	Cont.
NAWC - LAKEHURST	WR	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,472	2,776	Cont.	Cont.
Total					0	0	0	16,366	30,844	Cont.	Cont.
Support and Management
Contractor (TBD)	Misc.	Oct 97	Cont.	Cont.	0	0	0	1,500	4,000	Cont.	Cont.
Test and Evaluation Not Applicable

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

Item Description	Contract Method/ Fund Type Vehicle	Award/Oblig Date	Perform Activity EAC	Project Office EAC	Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Product Development Not Applicable
Support and Management Not Applicable
Test and Evaluation Not Applicable

			Total FY 1995 & Prior	FY 1996 Budget	FY 1997 Budget	FY 1998 Budget	FY 1999 Budget	To Complete	Total Program
Subtotal Product Development			0	0	0	16,366	30,844	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Support and Management			0	0	0	1,500	4,000	Cont.	Cont.
Subtotal Test and Evaluation			0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total Project			0	0	0	17,866	34,844	Cont.	Cont.