1998 Army Science and Technology Master PlanThis section briefly describes the missile and spacebased threats to the United States and its allies projected for the periods 199803 and 200415. Theater ballistic missiles (TBMs) are discussed first, followed by the strategic threat to the United States, cruise missiles, and, finally, space systems. Each of these sections addresses threat trends that will likely drive U.S. technology development.
a. Overview
Proliferation. There continues to be a trend away from manned weapon platforms toward unmanned weapon systems (TBMs, cruise missiles, etc.) with longer range standoff capabilities. Factors motivating this trend include economics, availability, regional power struggles, and lessons from the Gulf War. (Reference 1)
Technology Trends. As a result of the increase in "dualuse" computer, electronics, and materials technologies, we anticipate technological improvements in virtually every type of weapon system. The use of global positioning systems (GPSs) for cruise missile accuracy improvements is a good example of the employment of dualuse technology to improve an existing weapon system. (References 22, 23)
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). At least 20 countries have, or may be developing, nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) weapons and the ballistic missile systems needed to deliver them. Ten countries are reportedly pursuing biological weapons research, and at least as many are reported to be interested in developing nuclear weapons. The incorporation of these WMD munitions on various weapon platforms presents enormous challenges to defensive weapon systems designers. (References 24)
b. Theater Ballistic Missile Threat Overview
TBMs include ballistic missiles with ranges of less than 5,500
kilometers (km). They are surface launched, fly a ballistic trajectory that may include
aimpoint corrections, and can carry conventional or WMD warheads. TBMs are typically
transported and launched from a transportererector launcher (TEL), which provides
both mobility and concealment. The threat from TBMs is real and growing. The proliferation
of ballistic missiledelivered WMD is an issue directly confronting the strategic
interests of the U.S. and its traditional allies. Longrange artillery rockets are
included with TBMs since their size, trajectory, warheads, and target set are similar. TBM
performance trends are summarized in Figure D1. (References 1, 6)

c. Strategic Threat Overview
The strategic threats to the U.S. include intercontinental ballistic
missiles (ICBMs), submarinelaunched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and longrange
cruise missiles armed with WMD. The only current ICBM and SLBM threats to the U.S. are
Russia and China. Russia possesses over 6,500 warheads mounted on 1,300 ICBMs and SLBMs.
Under the provisions of the START I treaty, they must draw down inventories to less than
4,900 warheads by the year 2002, and they appear to be on schedule. If START II is
ratified by the Duma, a further reduction to 3,500 warheads should occur. While China is
both improving performance and the quantity of the weapons in its strategic force, Russia
is the only current strategicrange cruise missile threat. The strategic threat
performance summary is shown in Figure D2. (References 13, 5, 7)

d. Cruise Missile Threat Overview
Cruise missiles are receiving increased attention as a weapon that U.S. and allied forces are likely to encounter in various situations around the world. Cruise missiles are not a new threat. They were used extensively in World War II (the German V1), the Falklands War EXOCET, and most recently by the U.S. in the Persian Gulf War. While the majority of the current threat is designed for the antiship mission, this trend is expected to change to an emphasis on land attack cruise missiles (LACMs) in the near future. A further complication is their similarity to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which are being used more and more primarily for nonlethal missions around the world. Systems that possess antiradiation homing (ARH) capabilities are a particular concern to defensive systems. LACM and UAV performance trends are shown in Figure D3. (References 1, 4, 5, 916, 20)

e. Space System Threat Overview
Virtually all countries now have some degree of access to space system resources, either by developing their own space system resources, or by purchasing, leasing, renting, or timesharing available space system assets from one of the space developer nations or consortiums. Space systems are primarily utilized for two major purposes: observation and communications, with research coming up a distant third. The two primary functions serve as major force multipliers when considered in a military perspective. The space threat to the U.S. involves any trends that increase a foreign capability to perform these functions or to impair the U.S. capability, resulting in a reduction in the degree of our information superiority. The importance of this superiority was illustrated by the fact that the denial of access to spacebased information by Iraq was considered a major factor in the overall campaign success of Operation Desert Storm. Threat trends involving employment of space systems and antisatellite (ASAT) threats to U.S. space assets are summarized below in Figure D4. (References 1, 5, 8, 1719, 21)

FOCs provide fundamental guidance for S&T work based on warfighting requirements. Throughout this document every opportunity will be made to link technology to the fundamental needs of the warfighter as expressed in the FOCs. It is important to understand what constitutes warfighting requirements: it is a change to any of the current DTLOMS systems needed to achieve a desired future operational capability. Consulting a number of different areasincluding concept development, S&T research, warfighting experimentation, and the existence of urgent and immediate operational needswill now derive the new requirements. The requirements are determined throughout the Army but documented and defended primarily at TRADOC schools and Battle Labs. A crosswalk of FOCs to SMDC technologies is provided in Table D1.
Table D1. FOC/Technology Crosswalk |
||
Technology Area |
Future Operational Capabilities (May 1997) |
|
Kinetic Energy Weapon Technology |
||
| HittoKill Miniature Interceptor | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
| Exoatmospheric Interceptor Technology | TR97040 Firepower Lethality | |
| Pilot Line Experiment Technology | AR97001 Mounted Firepower |
|
| Focal Plane Array Technology | AR97001 Mounted Firepower |
|
| Advanced Discriminating LADAR | AR97001 Mounted Firepower |
|
| Signal/Data Processor | AD97006 Classification, Discrim, ID,
& Correlation of Information |
|
| Algorithm Development | AD97006 Classification,
Discrimination, ID, & Correlation of Information |
|
| Inertial Measurement Unit | DSA97003 TMD |
|
| Control System | AD97002 Mobility | |
| Booster Development | AD97002 Mobility |
|
| Power Development | DSA97003 TMD |
|
| Warhead Development | AD97002 Mobility |
|
| Endoatmospheric Interceptor Technology | AD97012 Counter Aerial &
SpaceBased RISTA Platforms |
|
| MillimeterWave Component | AV97006 Weapons Suite |
|
| Window Technology Development | DSA97003 TMD |
|
| Composite Airframe & Structure | AD97002 Mobility |
|
| Poly Acrylonitrile Fiber | DSA97003 TMD |
|
| SHORAD With Optimized Radar Distribution | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
Sensors Technology |
||
| CO2 LADAR Development Programs | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
| Advanced Radar Technology Program | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
| Focal Plan Array Processing & Packaging Development | AR97001 Mounted Firepower |
|
| Multimission Sensor Suite | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
Phenomenology |
||
| Phenomenology Analysis & Algorithm Development Program | AD97006 Classification,
Discrimination, ID, & Correlation of Information |
|
| Phenomenology Experiments Program | AD97006 Classification,
Discrimination, ID, & Correlation of Information |
|
BM/C4I |
||
| Integrated Operational Airspace Management System (IOAMS) | TR97001 Command & Control |
|
| Free Space Laser Communications | TR97007 Battlefield Info Passage |
|
| BM/C3I Technology | TR97XX Command & Control (ALL) |
|
Survivability and Lethality |
||
| Survivability | TR97043 SurvivabilityMateriel |
|
| Lethality | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
Modeling and Simulation |
||
| Modeling & Simulation | TR97003 Mission Planning &
Rehearsal |
|
Targets, Test, and Evaluation |
||
| Future Test Target Requirements | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
DirectedEnergy Weapons Technology |
||
| SolidState Laser Technology | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride Overtone Technology | AR97004 Mounted Target Acquisition
& ID |
|
Materials and Components Technology |
||
| Microelectronics/Optics Program | SP97006 Robust Architecture to
Overcome Degradation Factors |
|
| Innovative Radar Components Research | TR97002 Situation Awareness |
|
Operations Research and Systems Analysis |
||
| TEL Hunter/Killer | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
Advanced Technology Demonstrations |
||
| JLENS Program | TR97002 Situation Awareness |
|
| Kinetic Energy Antisatellite Program | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations |
||
| Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) | TR97040 Firepower Lethality |
|
Science and Technology Objectives |
||
| Laser Communications | TR97001 Command & Control |
|
| Laser Boresight (LLYNXEYE) | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
| Battlefield Ordnance Awareness | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
| Overhead Passive Sensor Technology for Battlefield Awareness | TR97002 Situational Awareness |
|
The technology under development and for future development by SMDC and MDSTC must support the Joint Vision 2010. Joint Vision 2010 applies new operational concepts as a mechanism to achieve military success across a range of operations. It recognizes that changes in how information is used and disseminated, as well as changes in technology, potential adversaries, and capabilities, will dramatically impact how well armed forces can perform their duties in 2010. This annex focuses on contributions to Joint Vision 2010 and the visions four key operational concepts, as described briefly below.
Dominate maneuver concerns the application of information, engagement, and mobility capabilities to position and employ widely dispersed joint air, land, sea, and space forces to accomplish assigned operational tasks (supporting technology efforts include battle management/command control, communications, and intelligence (BM/C3I), IOAMS, laser satellite communications, etc.).
Precision engagement concerns enhanced joint operations that ensure greater commonality between service precision engagement capabilities and provide future joint force commanders with a wide array of accurate and flexible response options. Technology programs supporting precision engagement include Advanced Radar Technology Program, multimission sensor suite (MMSS), forward acoustical sensor and digital relay (FASDR), CO2 laser detection and ranging (LADAR), LLYNXEYE, BM/C3I, hittokill (HTK) miniature interceptor, tactical highenergy laser (THEL), free electron laser (FEL), algorithm development, etc.
Fulldimensional protection concerns control of the battlespace to ensure forces can maintain freedom of action during deployment, maneuver, and engagement, while providing multilayered defenses (Exoatmospheric/Endoatmospheric Interceptor Technology Programs, THEL, shortrange air defense (SHORAD) with optimized radar distribution (SWORD), etc.) for forces and facilities.
Focused logistics concerns the fusion of information, logistics, and transportation technologies to provide rapid crisis response; track and shift assets even while en route; and deliver tailored logistics packages and sustainment directly at the strategic, operational, and tactical level. BM/C3I, laser satellite communications, free space laser communications (LASERCOM), etc., are technology programs and will support focused logistics.
Missile and space defense capabilities are an important part of Army Vision 2010. They enable a full spectrum of operations by contributing to force projection and force sustainment. They will also assist in providing information dominance and shaping of the battlespace through contributions of advanced technology and rapid prototyping of systems available to the soldier in nearreal time such as was demonstrated during Desert Storm. Army missile and space defense contributions to Army Vision 2010 include sensor fusion, NMD, situational understanding, total asset visibility, assured space access, precision navigation, precision targeting, global missile warning, nearrealtime weather, global communications, sensortoshooter links, and multielement joint TMD.
Click here to go to next page of document