13. Human Systems Interface
Human systems interface (HSI) technologies leverage and extend the capabilities of warfighters and maintainers to ensure that fielded systems will exploit the fullest potential of the warfighting team. The primary goal is to maximize information throughput from sensors, processors and displays to warfighters. HSI technologies are organized into four subareas: information management and display (IMD), performance aiding, system supportability, and design integration.
Most developed nations have significant research efforts in HSI. Interest in this area is driven by multiple requirements, including the need for improved presentation of information to match human cognition and improved representation of human performance to improve realism and fidelity of CGFs and "actors" in both simulations and operational systems. Important trends in foreign technology are summarized in Table E16, and additional information on each technology subarea are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Table E16. International Research CapabilitiesHuman Systems Interface
|Information Management & Display||VRIs; soldiersystem interface||Display; soldiersystem interface||Soldiersystem interface||Displays; VR; robotics||Israel
|Performance Aiding||HPM||Ergonomics; performance modeling||HPM||Israel, Sweden,
Human performance measures
|Design Integration||Performance modeling||Performance modeling||Performance modeling||Automated industry/enterprise design|
|Note: See Annex E, Section A.6 for explanation of key numerals.|
a. Information Management and Display
IMD develops methods and media to process and deliver taskcritical information to individuals, teams, and organizations. Maximizing the flow of information depends on developing timesensitive, supportable information handling and display components that serve as visual and auditory HSI for both weapons and support systems. Developing simulation interfaces is another area of keen interest. Simulations must be of sufficient fidelity to enhance mission planning and to permit diagnostic examination of emerging technologies and concepts. Model development is an important aspect of this work.
The major problem is that vast amounts of information, ranging from low to high degrees of certainty and veracity, threaten to overwhelm the human capacity to monitor, query, and act upon. Technical challenges include:
Improve alerting, warning, situational awareness, and identification of friend or foe (IFF)
Improve techniques for data fusion data using visual, auditory, and tactile displays
Develop individual VR displays
Improve voice recognition for computer control in the battlefield environment
Improve communications links for teleoperation, communications, and display.
A number of foreign countries have significant capabilities in HSI technologies. The United States has ongoing efforts with France and Germany in soldiersystem interfaces, especially related to teleoperations. The U.K. has noteworthy capabilities in soldiersystem interfaces, and VR interfaces (VRIs), and Canada in VR and HMDs. Israel also has unique expertise in HMDs. Japan is a leader in displays, VR, and robotics, all of which are needed for teleoperations.
b. Performance Aiding
The goals of performance aiding technologies are to enable soldiers to operate well beyond normal mental, physical, and perceptual capabilities, and to enhance performance in stressful, hazardous, timeconstrained, inhospitable, and remote environments. Areas of particular interest include computeraided crisis management decision support, unmanned robotic vehicles, and mobile manipulator platform control. In addition, concepts for battlefield synchronization, onthemove collaborative techniques, realtime decision making, and visualization for distributed problem solving are becoming increasingly important.
Technical challenges related to decision aiding and collaborative aiding include better understanding of the mechanisms of complex decision making and team collaboration, devising reliable diagnostic and performance measures, and developing models and methods to understand the internal and external motivating factors. Key elements are workload, uncertainty, coordination strategies, and realtime structural reconfiguration needs. Realtime, onthemove C2 is an essential element.
Physical and perceptual aiding, including teleoperations, faces difficult challenges in computerassisted map storage, retrieval, and reading, as well as developing practicalsized designs for powered exoskeletal machines to be worn by soldiers and controlled by kinematic sensors. This would allow significantly increased capabilities for lifting, carrying, and mobility. Another important area related to teleoperation is providing stabilized systems that can operate in mixedterrain without losing their balance. To aid in perception, technologies that provide textural, shape, color, and stereo effects for information presentation are needed.
The overall challenge in HSI is integrating the various aids into working systems and platforms.
Human performance modeling is a critical factor in meeting future Army requirements. Such modeling contributes to enhanced soldiersystem battlefield performance through lowrisk, quickturnaround simulation, permitting rapid assessment of proposed systems concepts. Human performance modeling ranges from anthropometric models of impulse and acoustic detection by the human ear, through cognitive and physical workload assessment, up to decision making under stress. France is recognized as a key international source for cooperative research in these aspects of HSI. Negotiations are underway with France on auditory research and ergonomics issues. The U.K. and Germany also have very strong capabilities in human performance modleing, and to a lesser but still significant extent, Israel, Netherlands and Sweden all have capabilities.
c. System Supportability
System supportability includes improving affordability, availability, operability, maintainability, and logistical supply to reduce lifecycle support costs. The Army must be able to provide early estimates of manpower, personnel, and training (MPT) as well as associated human performance requirements and costs for HSI, so they can be fed into the acquisition and design process. The set of manpower and personnel integration (MANPRINT) methods and tools are key elements in this effort. The goal is to have validated techniques that are robust enough to permit quantitative tradeoff analyses among various MPT variables and design options. This will allow decision makers to examine variations in systems performance as a function of MPT investment.
The increasing complexity of weapon systems makes it increasingly difficult to support those systems with personnel who can effectively operate and maintain them. Research is needed to determine the limits of attention saturation, mental workload, and manpower utilization in order to balance soldier resources and requirements with emerging technologies. This is essential to maintaining full military readiness, availability, sustainability, and effectiveness.
No specific foreign capabilities have been identified in support of this subarea, however, the cooperative effort with France mentioned above, related to ergonomics is directly related. The French are sharing modern ergonomic performance measuring instrumentation and techniques while the U.S. is sharing its MANPRINT suite of soldiersystem performance enhancement tools.
d. Design Integration
Developing and producing a fully integrated crew weapon or information system demands effective design tools, HSI models and databases, and performance metrics. Humansystem performance and cost variables must be part of the design process. Technology capabilities are required in human performance assessment and modeling, tools for enhancing physical accommodation, methods for human error and reliability assessment, and tools for crew station design and testing. Major technical challenges include:
Managing the magnitude of existing and emerging anthropometric and humansystem accommodation databases
Modeling and predicting complex human behavior
Simulating and quantifying battlefield effects on human mobility, sustainability, and performance
Integrating the diverse and fragmented technical disciplines required
The lack of industry or government standards and methodologies for HSI and crew system integration
Integrating human performance algorithms into semiautomated and fully automated forces simulation.
The MANPRINT efforts will play an important role in the design integration subarea. Foreign capabilities are similar to the IMD subarea described above. The U.K., France, and Germany offer the most capabilities in terms of performance modeling. Some of the worldclass work that Japan is doing in automating industry and enterprise design may be applicable to the challenging aspects of integrating systemofsystems.
AMC POC: Dr. Rodney Smith
Army Materiel Command
5001 Eisenhower Blvd.
Alexandria, VA 223330001
IPOC: Dr. Stephen L. Goldberg
Chief, Army Research Institutes Simulation Systems Research Unit
12350 Research Parkway
Orlando, FL 328263276
Click here to go to next page of document