AIRCREW TRAINING

A well trained force is the major contributor to readiness. To sustain readiness today and in the future requires quality people, in sufficient numbers, with quality training. These elements, when combined with weapon systems and supported by sound operational doctrine equal operational dominance. Reduced to its basic form:

(Manpower + Weapon Systems + Doctrine) x Training =

Operational Dominance

The major force multiplier in this overall equation is quality training. When viewed in relation to potential manpower challenges and reduced defense budgets, quality training remains the key element which must be sustained to maintain readiness.

Toward this goal, Naval Aviation has embarked on a training strategy which applies a systems view to address the three key elements of operational dominance. This strategy spans the full spectrum of the "Training Continuum" from aviation accessions through Fleet squadron training. This concept is captured in the accompanying figure.

To execute this strategy requires a balanced approach which includes: sufficient numbers of personnel accessed to meet Fleet requirements, quality training which spans undergraduate/graduate (Training Command through Fleet Replacement Squadron), and standardized Fleet squadron training. This strategy is being developed to ensure quality of training while realizing the impacts of constrained budgets today and in the future.

The major elements of this strategy include:

Detailed, quantifiable manpower accession plans to support Fleet requirements.
Development of a common Flight Simulator Stategy which provides a common architecture for new systems and defines a comprehensive plan to upgrade legacy systems. This plan will emphasize common databases and equipment where economically and operationally feasible.
Application of advanced training system technology to include Computer-Based Training (CBT), Interactive Course Ware (ICW), and improved flight/tactics simulators.
Integration of this technology into overall Ground-Based Training Systems (GBTS) such as the advanced undergraduate jet trainer T-45TS (Training System) and the Joint Primary Air Training System which will replace the T-34C primary training aircraft.
Advancements in ground/sea-based training ranges such as the Joint Tactical Combat Training System (JTCTS).
Full integration of Air Combat Training (ACT) and Operational Risk Management (ORM) into all phases of the training continuum. These efforts highlight the impact of safety as an integral part of training.
Development of a standardized, aircraft-specific fleet squadron training program applying the concept of the Air Combat Training Continuum (ACTC).
Integration of joint training where it makes sense. Towards this goal the Navy has taken the lead with the recent integration of all USAF Flight Officer and advanced turbo-prop pilot training into the Navy training system. The accompanying figures show the magnitude of this integration.

Naval Aviation has undertaken a proactive training strategy. This strategy has applied a balanced approach to training, incorporating the right technology to ensure quality of training while increasing potential efficiencies. The end goal remains a well-trained force, which ensures READINESS.