
DATE=2/22/2000 TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT TITLE=U-S-CHINA (L) NUMBER=2-259456 BYLINE=DAVID GOLLUST DATELINE=WHITE HOUSE CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: U-S diplomats are complaining to their Chinese counterparts in both Washington and Beijing over a new Chinese policy statement threatening to use force against Taiwan if reunification talks with the island drag on. V-O-A's David Gollust reports from the White House. TEXT: The Chinese threat to use "drastic" measures - including military force - if Taiwan tries to delay unification talks indefinitely came as an unwelcome surprise to the Clinton administration, which has been urging caution by both sides in the run-up to Taiwan's March 18th presidential election. White House spokesman Joe Lockhart renewed an appeal for engagement and restraint, and reiterated the U-S obligation to aid in Taiwan's defense, dating from the normalization of ties with Beijing in 1979: /// LOCKHART ACTUALITY /// If they were to take action which would try to resolve the issue between China and Taiwan through force, we'd view that with grave concern. That's the position articulated in the Taiwan Relations Act and that continues. /// END ACT /// Mr. Lockhart would not be specific about U-S actions if China carried out its new threat. But he noted President Clinton's dispatch of two navy aircraft carriers to the waters around Taiwan four years ago, after China staged missile tests near Taiwanese ports before the island's last presidential vote. The Chinese warning - in an official "white paper" from State Council in Beijing - drew bipartisan criticism in the U-S Congress, where the administration has been seeking approval for permanent normal trade status for China. The Republican chairman of the House International Relations committee - Benjamin Gilman - said he is deeply concerned by what he said is an attempt to "intimidate" Taiwan, and said the administration's policy of accommodation with China is proving ineffective. At a Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee hearing, Democrat John Kerry termed the Chinese white paper unacceptable, even if it is only a tactical move to influence the Taiwanese election: /// KERRY ACTUALITY /// Many of us are surprised by the bluntness and inappropriateness of this particular challenge. If it is merely an effort to try to affect the elections in Taiwan in a month, it is not a very shrewd way to do that. And it carries with it far more profound dangers for the longer-term interests of the United States and China and indeed the globe, which expects more from our relationship than this kind of saber-rattling. /// END ACT /// Appearing at the same Senate hearing, U-S Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Stanley Roth said U-S complaints were being lodged in both Beijing and the Chinese embassy in Washington over the statement. Mr. Roth said the document is contrary to the communiques that are the "bedrock" of U-S Chinese relations - and stands in sharp contrast to the moderation being shown by the major contenders in the Taiwanese presidential race. /// ROTH ACTUALITY /// We are at a moment where all three candidates in Taiwan, I think, have been trying to emphasize pragmatic, flexible positions that could get the two parties back to the negotiating table. And we believe that is the aspect that should be encouraged, and that Chinese policy should encourage this rather than discourage this with the type of statements we saw in the white paper yesterday. /// END ACT /// /// REST OPT /// Congressional Republicans say the Chinese statement underscores the need for final action on the bill approved earlier this month by the House of Representatives that would strengthen U-S military relations with Taiwan. Clinton spokesman (Joe) Lockhart, however, says the President already has the authority he needs to help Taiwan, and the proposed Taiwan Security Enhancement Act would be destabilizing. He also said the latest dispute need not de-rail efforts to win congressional approval for the China trade bill, given that its terms are so one-sided in favor of the United States. (Signed) NEB/DAG/ENE/gm/eap 22-Feb-2000 16:54 PM EDT (22-Feb-2000 2154 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .