Index

DATE=7/19/2000 TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT TITLE=CHINA-RUSSIA RELATIONS NUMBER=5-46688 BYLINE=ED WARNER DATELINE=WASHINGTON CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: The meeting of the presidents of China and Russia in Beijing this week indicates warming relations between the two sometimes quarrelsome powers. What brought them together in large part is their joint opposition to the planned U-S missile defense system, but they found agreement on other issues as well. V-O-A's Ed Warner asked three longtime analysts for their opinion of the Beijing summit and its possible implications for the global balance of power. TEXT: When Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Jiang Zemin met in Beijing this week, their main topic of conversation was the United States. Paula Dobriansky, Washington director of the Council on Foreign Relations, says President Putin was anxious to have Chinese backing before he meets President Clinton at the G-Eight summit in Okinawa: /// DOBRIANSKY ACT /// Moscow wants to make it quite clear that there is very strong opposition to a national missile defense program, and Russia is not going to move forward in this area along the lines which the United States has suggested to date. It also demonstrates or solidifies the statements that have been made out of Moscow about the kind of relationship that exists between Moscow and Beijing -- a kind of a counterweight to the hegemonic power of the United States in the world at large today. /// END ACT /// Concern over U-S policies brought the Russian and Chinese leaders together, says William Kirby, director of the Asia Center at Harvard University. But he believes a full-fledged alliance that could threaten the United States is all but inconceivable: /// 1st KIRBY ACT /// What is not inconceivable, however, is that they emerge as leaders of a group of nations that is uneasy with American unilateralism in the world, and the sense that the United States is pursuing its strategic objectives and its defense policy in contravention of signed agreements, such as the 1972 ABM Treaty, and without reaching new accords with the important nuclear powers, which are Russia and China. // END ACT /// Mr. Kirby says the two countries are closer today than in decades, partly because Beijing no longer fears the Russian political model could be a destabilizing influence in China. Russian democracy has made insufficient progress, and President Putin, stressing order and centralization, is a reassuring figure. Personal relations are critical, says Mr. Kirby: /// 2ND KIRBY ACT /// In the 1950's, Mao and Krushchev truly loathed each other, and that as much as anything else was the undoing of that relationship. Mr. Gorbachev also was not well liked in China, not just personally, but in terms of his political policies. I think Putin and Jiang Zemin are likely to get along in a sober, businesslike fashion, but without anything like a new alliance despite talk of future strategic partnerships. /// END ACT /// Other factors stand in the way of a more substantial alliance between Russia and China, says Keith Bush, director of the Russian and Eurasian program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. The two countries may deplore U-S policies but remain in need of U-S help: /// BUSH ACT /// In both cases, their relations with the United States are more important than with each other. This is certainly true for China, whose trade with the United States is probably 10 times as high as that with Russia. It is also true that Russia depends much more on the United States than on China. So this is good rhetoric, but it is not a strategic partnership or alliance. It is somewhat limited because of the rather poor economic ties between them. /// END ACT /// While Russia supplies China with a billion dollars in arms each year, overall trade between the two counties has declined from 10-billion dollars in 1994 to less than six-billion dollars last year. (Signed) NEB/EW/WTW 19-Jul-2000 18:54 PM EDT (19-Jul-2000 2254 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .