
DATE=12/22/98 TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT NUMBER=5-42217 TITLE=RESULTS OF BOMBING IRAQ BYLINE= ED WARNER DATELINE= WASHINGTON CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: WHAT DID THE U-S LED ATTACK ON IRAQ ACCOMPLISH? THAT QUESTION WAS DISCUSSED AT A WASHINGTON CONFERENCE, AND THE ANSWERS VARIED FROM PARTIAL SUCCESS TO NONE AT ALL. V-O-A'S ED WARNER REPORTS SOME OF THE CONTRASTING REACTIONS TO THE LATEST EFFORT TO SUPPRESS SADDAM HUSSEIN. TEXT: INTELLIGENCE WAS BETTER. BOMBING WAS MORE PRECISE AND LESS INHIBITED. THAT WAS THE VIEW OF MICHAEL EISENSTADT, DISCUSSING THE U-S RAID ON IRAQ AT A RECENT MEETING OF THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. A MILITARY ANALYST AT THE INSTITUTE, MR. EISENSTADT SAID THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION DESERVES SOME PRAISE FOR THE EFFORT: // EISENSTADT ACT // I THINK THE PRESIDENT AND HIS SENIOR ADVISERS SAID ALL THE RIGHT THINGS. THE MILITARY HIT THE RIGHT TARGETS. WITH THE CONTAINMENT REGIME TOTTERING AND LACKING DOMESTIC SUPPORT FOR A MAJOR GROUND WAR TO UNSEAT SADDAM, U-S DECISION MAKERS HAD TO SETTLE FOR HALF MEASURES THAT WILL PROBABLY NEVER YIELD ANYTHING MORE THAN PARTIAL RESULTS. // END ACT // LESS THAN PARTIAL, REPLIED ELIOT COHEN, DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC STUDIES AT THE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AT JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: // COHEN ACT // ! IF YOU ARE SADDAM HUSSEIN, SITTING THERE TODAY, AND TOU ASK YOURSELF, "AM I BETTER OFF TODAY THAN I WAS A WEEK AGO?" IT IS CONCEIVABLE TO ME THAT HIS ANSWER WOULD BE "YES." // END ACT // MR. COHEN SAID THE STRIKE WAS NOT PART OF ANY LARGER STRATEGY AND SIMPLY LEAVES SADDAM HUSSEIN STRONGER THAN EVER BECAUSE HE HAS STOOD UP TO THE SUPERPOWER AND CAN NOW END THE WEAPONS INSPECTIONS. THE ONLY SOUND STRATEGY IS TO REDUCE HIS MILITARY MANPOWER, SAID MR. COHEN. BUT THE UNITED STATES INSISTS ON KEEPING CASUALTIES ON BOTH SIDES TO A MINIMUM. NOT A SINGLE AMERICAN OR BRITISH LIFE WAS LOST ON THE RAIDS: // COHEN ACT // THE MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR THIS OPERATION IS - TO BE KIND OF BRUTAL ABOUT IT - NOT BUILDINGS DESTROYED BUT PEOPLE KILLED. HERE WE REALLY HAVE DEVELOPED A CERTAIN KIND OF SKITTISHNESS ABOUT FACING UP TO WHAT IT IS THAT WE ARE REALLY TRYING TO DO, WHICH IS TO KILL PEOPLE. // END ACT // THIS RELUCTANCE TO TAKE LIVES, SAID MR. COHEN, SHARPLY LIMITS THE POWER OF THE WORLD'S ONLY REMAINING SUPERPOWER. IT HAS AWESOME TECHNOLOGY IT IS UNWILLING TO USE. THEN WHY THE BOMBING? MR. COHEN SAYS IRAQ HAS FEW REMAINING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION TO DESTROY. NOR COULD THE UNITED STATES ELIMINATE THEM ALL UNLESS IT WANTS TO DENY PESTICIDES TO IRAQ AND ABOLISH SCHOOL LABORATORIES. IN HIS OPINION, THE ATTACK WAS LAUNCHED TO PRESERVE U-S CREDIBILITY: // COHEN ACT // IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS WAS A DECISION WHICH WAS ACTUALLY MADE ON AUTO-PILOT. IT GOES BACK A MONTH AGO TO THE LAST STAND-OFF WITH SADDAM, WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION MADE A DECISION - WHICH IT NEVER REEXAMINED - THAT THE NEXT TIME ONE OF THESE THINGS HAPPENED, IT WAS GOING TO PULL THE TRIGGER WITHOUT THINKING, AND THAT IS WHAT THEY DID. // END ACT // THERE WAS LITTLE THINKING ABOUT THE REACTION OF MUSLIMS, ACCORDING TO SOME MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE. REND RAHIM FRANCKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AN OPPOSITION GROUP, THE IRAQ FOUNDATION, SAID THE UNITED STATES MAY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO STRIKE IRAQ ONCE WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF ARAB COUNTRIES: // FRANCKE ACT // BUT IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO TOLERATE RECURRENT STRIKES AT SHORT INTERVALS, AND ESPECIALLY I MIGHT ADD, STRIKES WHICH DO NOT HAVE A PARTICULAR POLITICAL RESULT AND A POLITICAL END GAME. THEY ARE NOT TIED TO A POLITICAL DENOUEMENT IN IRAQ BUT TIED TO PUNISHMENT OR REPRISAL. // END ACT // REND FRANCKE SAID THE UNITED STATES WILL DO BETTER BY WORKING WITH THE IRAQI OPPOSITION SINCE DISCONTENT IN IRAQ IS WIDESPREAD. (SIGNED) NEB/PT 22-Dec-98 5:32 PM EST (2232 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .