
DATE=2/1/99 TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT NUMBER=5-42490 TITLE=QUESTIONING AID TO THE IRAQI OPPOSITION BYLINE= ED WARNER DATELINE= WASHINGTON CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: WASHINGTON IS DIVIDED ON U-S AID TO THE IRAQI OPPOSITION. THE CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT ARE IN FAVOR, BUT THE MILITARY IS SKEPTICAL. THE COMMANDER OF U-S FORCES IN THE PERSIAN GULF TOLD CONGRESS THE OPPOSITION HAS LITTLE CHANCE OF SUCCEEDING, AND ITS EFFORTS COULD LEAD TO CHAOS IN IRAQ. OTHERS SAY THAT THINKING IS TOO PESSIMISTIC AND TENDS TO UNDERMINE THE AID PROGRAM. VOA'S ED WARNER REPORTS. TEXT: TESTIFYING RECENTLY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, THE U-S COMMANDER IN THE PERSIAN GULF, MAJOR GENERAL ANTHONY ZINNI, SAID THE MILITARY AID VOTED FOR THE IRAQI OPPOSITION IS ILL ADVISED. IN HIS OPINION, THE OPPOSITION IS TOO FRAGMENTED. ITS VARIOUS GROUPS ARE UNWILLING TO COOPERATE AND COULD BRING CHAOS, EVEN DISINTEGRATION TO IRAQ. IN RESPONSE, A U-S STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN SAID THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION IS SOLIDLY BEHIND THE 97 MILLION DOLLAR AID PACKAGE VOTED BY CONGRESS, THOUGH IT SHARES THE GENERAL'S CONCERN THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE AN EASY OR SHORT TERM EFFORT. JAMES PHILLIPS, A MIDDLE EAST ANALYST AT THE PRIVATE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, SAYS THE PENTAGON IS VERY CAUTIOUS ABOUT SUPPLYING WEAPONS ABROAD OR GETTING THE UNITED STATES INVOLVED IN THE USE OF FORCE: // PHILLIPS ACT // SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (WILLIAM) COHEN PREVIOUSLY HAD EXPRESSED THIS CAUTION ON THE DAY PRESIDENT CLINTON ANNOUNCED SUPPORT FOR THE IRAQI OPPOSITION. SO THIS IS KIND OF A CONTINUING POLICY OF THE PENTAGON. BUT IT IS TROUBLING BECAUSE IT DOES SUGGEST THERE IS SOME DIFFERENCE OF OPINION BETWEEN THE PENTAGON AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT. // END ACT // PERHAPS NOT AS MUCH AS THE HEADLINES SUGGEST. A KEY STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL SAYS THE SPLIT IS EXAGGERATED. HE NOTES AID TO THE IRAQI OPPOSITION IS ONE OF SEVERAL POLICIES AIMED AT THE OVERTHROW OF SADDAM HUSSEIN. THE IRAQI LEADER IS NOT LIKELY TO MAKE TOO MUCH OF THE DISPUTE OVER AID BECAUSE HE TAKES HIS OWN READING OF THE WASHINGTON SCENE, AND IT MAY DIFFER MARKEDLY FROM AMERICAN PERCEPTIONS. REPUBLICANS IN THE U-S CONGRESS ARE THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE AID. SOME ANALYSTS SUGGEST THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MAY NOT FULLY SHARE THEIR ENTHUSIASM, AND ITS POSITION IS NOT THAT FAR REMOVED FROM THE PENTAGON'S. THERE IS THE ADDITIONAL QUESTION OF WHAT KIND OF AID SHOULD BE PROVIDED. THE KURDS IN NORTHERN IRAQ, FOR EXAMPLE, ARE RELUCTANT TO ACCEPT ANY THAT WOULD ANTAGONIZE SADDAM HUSSEIN, WHO IS CURRENTLY LEAVING THEM ALONE. TURKEY, WHICH IS FIGHTING A LONG WAR WITH KURDISH REBELS IN ITS SOUTH, DOES NOT WANT MORE WEAPONS SUPPLIED TO KURDS ACROSS THE BORDER IN IRAQ. DANIEL BYMAN, A POLICY ANALYST AT RAND, A PRIVATE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, SAYS THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION IS UNDER PRESSURE FROM REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS TO BRING THE CONFLICT WITH IRAQ TO SOME KIND OF CONCLUSION. ARAB NATIONS ARE ALSO IMPATIENT WITH U-S POLICY. SO THE ADMINISTRATION NEEDED A NEW PLAN. UNFORTUNATELY, LIKE THE PENTAGON, MR. BYMAN BELIEVES IT IS FLAWED: // BYMAN ACT // THE MAJOR KURDISH GROUPS HAVE FOUGHT WITH EACH OTHER. THE MOST IMPORTANT SEGMENTS OF THE OPPOSITION HAVE NOT COORDINATED THEIR ACTIONS IN ANY COMPREHENSIVE, SYSTEMATIC WAY, AND INSTEAD HAVE OFTEN GONE THEIR OWN WAYS AND SHOWN LITTLE UNITY. // END ACT // MR. BYMAN ADDS THAT THE UNITED STATES HAS LET THE KURDS DOWN IN THE PAST. HE WOULD NOT LIKE TO SEE ANOTHER ABANDONMENT. BUT MR. PHILLIPS OF THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION SAYS THE KURDS COULD CHANGE THEIR MIND: // PHILLIPS ACT // AS WE HAVE SEEN BEFORE, SADDAM TENDS TO LASH OUT EVEN WHEN HE IS NOT PROVOKED. AND IF AND WHEN HE DOES, I THINK THE KURDS' ATTITUDE ABOUT ACCEPTING OUTSIDE ASSISTANCE WILL CHANGE VERY QUICKLY. // END ACT // MR. PHILLIPS ADDS ACHIEVING COOPERATION AMONG OPPOSITION GROUPS NOW WOULD HELP KEEP IRAQ UNIFIED WHEN SADDAM HUSSEIN IS GONE. RAND ANALYST BYMAN SAYS THERE MUST BE A SOLID CENTRAL AUTHORITY TO REPLACE SADDAM: // BYMAN ACT // IF THERE IS NO STRONG REGIME, THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY THAT IT COULD BREAK UP ETHNICALLY, RELIGIOUSLY, ALONG TRIBAL LINES, THAT THERE COULD BE CHAOS AND FIGHTING. THE QUESTION THE UNITED STATES HAS TO ASK: IS IT WORTH RISKING INCREASED INSTABILITY TO OVERTHROW SADDAM? I WOULD SAY CERTAINLY YES, BUT WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT IRAQ COULD THEN BECOME A LONG TERM PROBLEM IF CHAOS ENGULFED IT. // END ACT // AND THAT IS THE PROBLEM GENERAL ZINNI AND THE PENTAGON ARE TRYING TO AVOID. (SIGNED) NEB/PT 01-Feb-99 8:33 PM EST (0133 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .