News

DATE=4/16/99 TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT NUMBER=2-248212 TITLE=U-N / IRAQ DISARMAMENT (L - ONLY) BYLINE=MAX RUSTON DATELINE=UNITED NATIONS CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL IS STEPPING UP EFFORTS TO RESOLVE DIVISIONS OVER HOW TO REVIVE THE U-N DISARMAMENT PROGRAM IN IRAQ. THE COUNCIL CONSIDERED TWO RESOLUTIONS ON THE ISSUE TODAY (FRIDAY), ONE FROM RUSSIA, THE OTHER FROM BRITAIN AND THE NETHERLANDS. V-O-A'S U-N CORRESPONDENT MAX RUSTON HAS THE STORY. TEXT: THE TWO DRAFT RESOLUTIONS SHOW THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS REMAIN DIVIDED OVER KEY ISSUES SUCH AS THE LIFTING OF SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAQ AND THE METHOD OF MONITORING THAT COUNTRY'S WEAPONS PROGRAMS. BUT DIPLOMATS SAY DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT RESOLUTIONS IS NEVERTHELESS A STEP FORWARD, REPRESENTING A MOVE FROM ALMOST COMPLETE IMPASSE TO CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSION. THE RUSSIAN DRAFT RESOLUTION SUGGESTS THAT ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ON IRAQ BE LIFTED AS SOON AS BAGHDAD DEMONSTRATES FULL COOPERATION WITH A RECONSTITUTED U-N WEAPONS INSPECTION COMMISSION. THE DRAFT RESOLUTION SUBMITTED BY BRITAIN AND THE NETHERLANDS DOES NOT SUGGEST THE LIFTING OF SANCTIONS. BUT IT DOES CALL FOR AN INCREASED NUMBER OF EXCEPTIONS TO THE SANCTIONS, IN ORDER TO GENERATE MORE MONEY FOR HUMANITARIAN EFFORTS IN IRAQ. THE U-S REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED NATIONS PETER BURLEIGH DESCRIBES THE RESOLUTION FROM BRITAIN AND THE NETHERLANDS AS A GOOD START. BUT HE SAYS WASHINGTON HAS SOME PROBLEMS WITH IT. HE DISMISSES THE RUSSIAN PROPOSAL AS NOT SERIOUS. RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR SERGEI LAVROV SAYS THE ONLY PROPOSALS THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED SERIOUS ARE THOSE THAT IRAQ WILL COOPERATE WITH. AND HE SAYS THE ONLY WAY TO ACHIEVE SUCH COOPERATION IS THROUGH THE LIFTING OF SOME SANCTIONS. /// LAVROV ACT /// THIS IS AN APPROACH WHICH DOES NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO THE ABILITY OF THE COUNCIL TO IMPLEMENT ITS OWN RESOLUTIONS. WE BELIEVE THIS IS THE ONLY WAY -- I MEAN THE WAY WHICH WOULD GIVE IRAQ A CLEAR ROADMAP TO LIFTING SANCTIONS -- THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO BRING THE UNITED NATIONS BACK IN IRAQ. UNLESS YOU BRING THE U-N BACK IN IRAQ, YOU DO NOT KNOW IF YOU ARE REALLY SAFE FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF NON-RESUMPTION OF THE PROGRAMS IN IRAQ TO PRODUCE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. /// END ACT /// THE COUNCIL REACHED A DEADLOCK IN ITS DISCUSSIONS ON IRAQ IN DECEMBER, AFTER BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES BEGAN AIR STRIKES AGAINST THAT COUNTRY. THE AIR STRIKES FOLLOWED IRAQ'S FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH THE EXISTING U-N WEAPONS INSPECTION COMMISSION, UNSCOM. COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE NOW TRYING TO REVIVE THE UNITED NATIONS' ABILITY TO MONITOR IRAQ'S WEAPONS PROGRAMS. BUT IRAQ SAYS IT WILL COOPERATE WITH THOSE EFFORTS ONLY IF THE SECURITY COUNCIL FIRST LIFTS SANCTIONS IMPOSED AFTER THE GULF WAR. BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES SAY THOSE SANCTIONS CANNOT BE LIFTED UNTIL THE UNITED NATIONS HAS FULLY VERIFIED IRAQ'S CLAIM THAT IT NO LONGER HAS ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. CHINA, RUSSIA AND FRANCE SAY SOME SANCTIONS SHOULD BE LIFTED IF THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO SECURE IRAQ'S COOPERATION IN THE DISARMAMENT PROCESS. THE COUNCIL IS ALSO TRYING TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES OVER HOW TO IMPROVE HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO IRAQ AND SPEED UP THE RESOLUTION OF QUESTIONS CONCERNING MISSING PRISONERS OF WAR FROM THE GULF WAR. DISCUSSIONS ON THE TWO DRAFT RESOLUTIONS ARE EXPECTED TO CONTINUE NEXT WEEK. (SIGNED) NEB/UN/MPR/LSF/PT 16-Apr-99 3:23 PM EDT (1923 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .