FAS | Nuke | Guide | Russia | ICBM |||| Index | Search |



R-36M / SS-18 SATAN

The R-36m / SS-18 intercontinental ballistic missile is a large, two-stage, tandem, storable liquid-propellant inertial guided missile developed to replace the SS-9 ICBM. Housed in hard silos, the highly accurate fourth generation SS-18 ICBM is larger than the Peacekeeper, the most modern deployed US ICBM. The SS-18 opened a "window of vulnerability" of Minuteman silos (at 300 psi) by 1975, so that some analysts aregued that few Minuteman could be expected to survive a Soviet attack by 1980. The "window of vulnerability" of U.S. land based strategic missiles opened on schedule, and became one of the major issues in U.S. strategic debates in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The R-36M (15A14) was a two-stage missile capable of carrying several different warheads. The basic design is similar to the R-36 missile modified to include advanced technologies and more powerful engines. This missile, using dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) and heptyl (a UDMH [unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazine] compound) has a first stage powered by a 460-ton-thrust motor with four combustion chambers, and the second by a single-chamber 77-ton-thrust motor. The first stage uses four closed-cycle single chambered rocket motors. The second stage was equipped with a closed-cycle single chambered sustainer motor and an open-cycle four chambered control motor. The second stage sustainer is built into the fuel tank's toroidal cavity. The flight control of the first stage was conducted through gimbaled sustainers. The sustainers used asymmetrical dimethylhydrazine and nitrogen tetraoxide. The missile was equipped with an autonomous inertial command structure and an onboard digital computer.

The R-36M used a gas-dynamic method for the first and second stages whereby special ports are opened through which the propellant tanks are pressurized. This obviated the need for the use of pressurant gases from tanks and the so-called chemical tanks pressurization (by injecting small amounts of fuel in the oxidizer tank and oxidizer into the fuel tank). The improved design and more effective engines allowed an increase in the total liftoff weight from 183 tons to 209.6 ton and the throw weight from 5.8 tons to 8.8 tons, while maintaining the overall dimensions of its predecessor missile.

The SS-18 was deployed in modified SS-9 silos, and employed a cold-launch technique with the missile being ejected from the silo prior to main engine ignition. The rocket was placed in a transport-launch canister made of fiberglass composites. The container was placed into an adapted R-36 silo. The specially hardened silo was 39 meters deep and had a diameter of 5.9 m. Prior to main engine ignition the missile was ejected from the container with the help of a solid-propellant gas generator located in the lower unit of the transport-launch canister. According to Western estimates, the SS-18 was deployed in a silo with a hardness of at least 4,000 psi (281 kg/sq. cm; 287 bar), and possibly as high as 6,000 psi (422 kg/sq. cm; 430 bar).

The development of the two stage heavy liquid-propellant ICBM R-36M intended to replace the R-36 SS-9 Scarp was accepted on 02 September 1969. The preliminary design was completed in December 1969 by the design bureau was KB Yuzhnoye. The system was designed by the M. K. Yangel OKB Yuzhnoye at Dnepropetrovsk (Ukraine) during 1966-1972, with testing beginning in November 1972. It was deployed in January 1975, and integrated with the weapons arsenal in December 1975.

There are six variants that have been deployed, while others were tested but not deployed:

The only deployed versions of the SS-18 are the R-36M UTTh and R-36M2. In 1997 there were 186 deployed launchers for of these missiles in Russia. The dismantling of 104 launchers located in Kazakhstan was completed in September 1996.

The Reagan and Bush administrations respected the SS-18 to such a degree that they made it the main focus of their arms control initiatives. The START II Treaty specifically banned land-based MIRV systems, in part, because of the threat the SS-18 posed to the balance of power. It was seen as a first-strike weapon and a very destabilizing presence in the bilateral relationship.

US negotiators allowed the Russian Federation to retain 90 of the SS-18 silos. After complying with the START II silo conversion protocol, the Russian Rocket Forces will be permitted to replace 90 of the SS-18s with a smaller, single-warhead missile. The protocol requires Russia to place a 2.9-meter restrictive ring near the top of the retained SS-18 silos and to fill the bottom five meters of the silos with concrete. These measures make the silos too small to hold an SS-18.

The Nunn-Lugar program is assisting in the reduction of the SS-18 missile threat to the United States. The Russian Federation must eliminate 100 SS-18s by December 2001 and an additional 154 SS-18s by January 2003. In recent years, Nunn-Lugar has played a role in SS-18 dismantlement. It provided the equipment necessary to help destroy the missiles. A total of 204 of these missiles were deployed on Russian territory and 104 in Kazakhstan. The elimination base at Surovatikha, near Nijny-Novgorod, destroyed 32 missiles in 1993 with the remaining 44 destroyed in 1994.

The SS-18 was manufactured in Ukraine, while Russian enterprises provide maintenance for SS-18s which are currently in inventory. Manufacturing of SS-18s in Russia would be expensive, and could require 5 to 7 years of design work to begin at least tests at a cost of 8-10 billion rubles.

Specifications

Mod

Mod-1

Mod-2

Mod-3

Mod-4

Mod-5

Mod-6

DIA

SS-18

SS-18

SS-18

SS-18

SS-18

SS-18

NATO

Satan

Satan

Satan

Satan

Satan

Satan

Bilateral

RS-20A

RS-20A

RS-20A

RS-20B

RS-20V

RS-20V

Service

R-36M

R-36M

R-36M

UTTkh

R-36MU

UTTkh

R-36M2

R-36M2

OKB/Industry

15A14

15A14

15A14

15A18

15A18M

15A18M

Design

Bureau

OKB-586

Acad. V. F. Utkin

OKB-586 Acad. V. F. Utkin

OKB-586

Acad. V. F. Utkin

OKB-586

Acad. V. F. Utkin

OKB-586 Acad. V. F. Utkin

OKB-586 Acad. V. F. Utkin

Approved

9/2/1969

9/2/1969

9/2/1969

8/16/1977

8/9/83

6/1979 ?12/17/

1980 ?

Years of R&D

1969-1973

1969-1973

 

12/ 76 - 78

1983-1988

1979-1982

Engineering and Testing

1973-1974

1973-1975

1978-1980

1977-1979

1986-88

1986-1990

First Flight Test

1 / / 72 1St. failure

2/21/1973 success 1 & another derivation 11-29-79

9/ /73,

08/ /73 & another derivation

07/ /78

7/ /1978

7/31/1977

or 10-31-1977

3/21/86

two failures in the flight test program

1986

IOC

12 /25 / 1974

1975

1980

9/1979 ? 11-27-1979?

12/1988

1990

Deployment Date

12/30/

1975

12/30/

1975 or 11/20/78

11/29/

1979

12/17/

1979, or 1980?

12/1988

9/1991

Type of

Warhead

Single

MIRV

Single

MIRV

MIRV

Single

Warheads

1

8

1

10

10

1

Yield (Mt)
Russian sources

18-20

0.5-1.3

24-25

0.55

0.55-0.75

20

Yield (Mt)
Western sources

18-25

0.6-1.5

18-25

0.75-1.0

Payload (t)

7.2

7.2 - 8.8

7.2 - 8.8

8.8

8.8

8.8

Total length (m)

33.6

33.6

33.6

34.3

37.25

36.3

Total length w/o warhead (m)

28.5

28.5

28.5

28.5 -29.25

29.25

29.25

Missile Diameter (m)

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

Launch Weight (t)

209.6 -210

209.6 -210

209.6 -210

211.1

211.1

211.1

Fuel Weight (t)

188

188

188

188

188

188

Range (km)

11200

9250-10200

16.000

16000

11500

11000

15,000

16000

CEP (m)

Russian Sources

1000

1000

1000

920

500

500

CEP (m) Western Sources

400-550

400-500

350

220-320

250

?250

Number of Stages

2

Canister length (m)

27.9

Canister diameter (m)

3.5

Booster guidance system

Inertial, autonomous

 

1st stage

2nd stage

Length (m)

22.3

7.0

Body diameter (m)

3.0

3.0

Fueled weight (t)

 

Total 161.5

Dry weight (t)

 

Total 48.1 ? 48.5

Engine Designation

RD-263 x 4 = RD-264 (11D119) for the

R-36M

RD-0228 = RD-0229 one main engine and RD-0230 four verniers for the R-36M

Engine Designation

RD-273 / RD-274 for the R-36MU

RD-0230 verniers for the R-36M

Engine Designation

N/A

RD-0255 = RD-0256 one main engine & RD-0257 four verniers for the R-36M2.

Design Bureau

Acad. V. P. Glushko (OKB-456)

Acad. S. A. Kosberg

(OKB-154)

Configuration

Four RD-263?s Engines = RD-264

1 Main Engine + 4 Verniers

Years Of R & D

1969-1973 = RD-263 x 4=RD-264

1967-1975 = RD-0228 / RD-0229

Years Of R & D

1975-1980 = RD-273

1967-1975 = RD-0230

Years Of R & D

 

1983-1989 = RD-0255

1983-1987 = RD-0256

1983-1987 = RD-0257

Propellants

Liquid Storable

Liquid Storable

Fuel

UDMH

UDMH

Oxidizer

Nitrogen Tetraoxide

Nitrogen Tetraoxide

Burn Time (sec.)

   

Main Engines Thrust Sea Level/Vacuum (Tonnes)

424 / 450-461

77

Verniers Engine Thrust Sea Level/Vacuum (Tonnes)

N/A

?

Main Engines Specific Impulse Sea Level/ Vacuum (sec.)

293 / 312-318

 
     

MIRV Bus Third Stage Engine Designation for the R-36M2

 

RD-869

Design Bureau (Bus)

 

Yuzhnoy SKB

Years Of R & D (Bus)

 

1983-1985

Propellants (Bus)

 

Liquid Storable

Fuel (Bus)

 

UDMH

Oxidizer (Bus)

 

Nitrogen Tetraoxide

Thrust Vacuum (Tonnes)

 

2.087- 0.875

Engines Specific Impulse (sec.)

 

313 ? 302.3

Burn Time (sec.)

 

700

Basing Mode

Silo

Hardness

 

Launching Technique

Cold and Solid motor

Deployed boosters

 

Test Boosters

 

Warheads Deployed

 

Training Launchers

 

Space Booster Variant

Yes- SL-21?/Dnipr SS-18 derivation

Deployment Sites

START

Locale US-Designation

Aleysk in Altai (30)

Aleysk

Derzhavinsk near Akmolinsk (52)

Imeni Gastello

Dombarovsky-3 near Orenbourg (64)

Dombarovskiy

Kartaly-6 near Chelyabinsk (46)

Kartaly

Uzhur-4 near Krasnoyarsk (64)

Uzhur

Zhangiz-Tobe near Seminpalatinsk (52)

Zhangiz Tobe


SS-18/RS-20 in Launch Canister

SS-18/RS-20, Stage 1

SS-18/RS-20 Missile

SS-18/RS-20
Emplacement
Equipment

Sources and Resources



FAS | Nuke | Guide | Russia | ICBM |||| Index | Search |


http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/icbm/r-36m.htm
Implemented by John Pike, Charles Vick, Mirko Jacubowski, and Patrick Garrett
Maintained by Webmaster
Updated Saturday, July 29, 2000 10:17:36 AM