INDEX


U.S. Department of Energy                                 ORDER
     Washington, D.C.                                  DOE 5630.16A
                                                          6-3-93

SUBJECT:  SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY ACCEPTANCE AND VALIDATION TESTING PROGRAM

1.   PURPOSE.  To establish policy, requirements, and responsibilities for a
     Safeguards and Security Acceptance and Validation Testing Program that
     encompasses systematic processes for demonstrating the adequacy and
     functional reliability of critical system elements and/or total systems
     employed to meet safeguards and security protection needs.

2.   CANCELLATION.  DOE 5630.16, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY PERFORMANCE TEST
     PROGRAM, of 8-25-92.

3.   APPLICATION TO CONTRACTS.  The provisions of this Order apply to all
     Departmental elements and covered contractors to the extent implemented
     under a contract or other agreement.  A covered contractor is a seller
     of supplies or services involving access to and protection of
     classified information, nuclear materials, or other safeguards and
     security interests under a procurement contract or subcontract.

4.   EXCLUSIONS.  This Order does not apply to unclassified computer
     systems, TEMPEST, communications security, or sensitive compartmented
     information facilities which are covered by DOE Orders 1360.2B,
     5300.2D, 5300.3C, and 5639.8, respectively.  DOE facilities and
     activities regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are
     exempt from the requirements of this Order.  Office of Civilian
     Radioactive Waste Management (RW) personnel and activities not directly
     associated with the NRC licensed facilities and thus not covered by the
     NRC directives are subject to the provisions of this Order.

5.   REFERENCES AND DEFINITIONS.  See Attachment 1.

6.   POLICY.

     a.   The adequacy of new and existing safeguards and/or security
          systems to perform or accomplish the intended purpose shall be
          confirmed through an acceptance and validation testing program
          prior to operational use and periodically thereafter.

     b.   Safeguards and security acceptance and validation testing programs
          implemented under this Order shall be formalized and documented.

     c.   DOE elements and DOE covered contractors are required to ensure
          that safeguards and security measures implemented under their
          cognizance meet established requirements for reliability,
          operability, readiness, and performance.

     d.   The provisions of this Order shall be fully implemented by
          8-25-95.

7.   RESPONSIBILITIES.

     a.   Secretarial Officers shall ensure the provisions of this Order are
          implemented for programs over which they have responsibility.
          They shall:

          (1)  Clearly establish the criteria for taking necessary action,
               as circumstances and policies indicate, including curtailment
               or suspension of operations when such operations would result
               in an immediate and unacceptable risk to national security
               and/or the health and safety of employees or the public.  If
               these authorities are delegated, such delegations shall be
               clearly established in writing, and shall be kept current.

          (2)  Ensure that corrective actions for deficiencies identified by
               the testing program at facilities under their administrative
               jurisdiction are implemented.

          (3)  Ensure an individual(s) is designated to be responsible for
               bringing to the attention of the contracting officer each
               procurement falling within the scope of this Order.  Unless
               another individual is designated, the responsibility is that
               of the procurement request originator (the individual
               responsible for initiating a requirement on DOE F 4200.33,
               "Procurement Request Authorization").

          (4)  Require covered DOE contractors to develop, implement, and
               manage a comprehensive safeguards and security acceptance and
               validation test program in accordance with provisions of this
               Order.

     b.   Director of Security Affairs (SA-1) shall provide management
          direction and coordination in the development, implementation, and
          oversight regarding safeguards and security acceptance and
          validation testing.

     c.   Director of Safeguards and Security (SA-10) shall:

          (1)  Develop and provide Departmental policy and guidance
               regarding safeguards and security acceptance and validation
               testing.

          (2)  Ensure the development of the Headquarters Safeguards and
               Security Validation Test Program Plan for Headquarters
               safeguards and security program interests in accordance with
               this Order.

          (3)  Ensure the development of an implementation plan for full
               compliance with the requirements of this Order for
               Headquarters activities.

     d.   Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security Evaluations (EH-4) shall
          independently inspect and evaluate the degree of adherence by
          Departmental elements to DOE policies and requirements relating to
          the content, conduct, and results of the safeguards and security
          acceptance and validation testing program.

     e.   Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NE-60) shall, in
          accordance with the responsibilities and authorities assigned by
          Executive Order 12344 (statutorily prescribed by Public Law 98-525
          (42 U.S.C. 7158, (note)) and to ensure consistency throughout the
          joint Navy/DOE organization of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion
          Program, implement and oversee all policy and practices pertaining
          to this Order for activities under the Director's cognizance.

     f.   Heads of Field Elements, except the Administrators of the Power
          Marketing Administrations, shall:

          (1)  Establish written delegations of authorities and
               responsibilities, as well as reporting requirements, for the
               administration of the safeguards and security acceptance and
               validation testing programs.

          (2)  Ensure the development and approval of safeguards and
               security acceptance and validation test program plans in
               accordance with this Order.

          (3)  Develop and recommend budgets and related resources to the
               cognizant Secretarial Officer for providing support to the
               testing program.

          (4)  Ensure that corrective actions for deficiencies identified by
               the testing program are documented, prioritized, and
               implemented.

          (5)  Take action, as circumstances and policies indicate,
               including curtailment or suspension of operations when such
               operations would result in an immediate and unacceptable risk
               to national security and/or the health and safety of
               employees or the public.

          (6)  Designate an individual(s) to be responsible for bringing to
               the attention of the contracting officer each procurement
               falling within the scope of this Order.  Unless another
               individual is designated, the responsibility is that of the
               procurement request originator (the individual responsible
               for initiating a requirement on DOE f 4200.33, "Procurement
               Request Authorization").

          (7)  RequIre covered DOE contractors to develop, implement, and
               manage comprehensive safeguards and security acceptance and
               validation test programs in accordance with provisions of
               this Order.

          (8)  Serve as approval authority for safeguards and security
               validation test program implementation plans submitted by
               subordinate organizations.

     g.   Administrators of the Power Marketing Administrations.  Section
          302 of the DOE Organization Act (Public Law 95-91) directs the
          Secretary to operate and maintain the power marketing
          administrations by and through their Administrators.  The
          Administrators have statutory and public utility responsibilities
          for the safety, security, and reliability of the systems operated
          by their organizations.  The Administrators shall review and
          approve the security standards, policies, and activities
          appropriate for their facilities and operations.  Such
          determination shall include consideration of the requirements set
          forth by this Order.

     h.   Procurement Request Originators (the individuals responsible for
          initiating a requirement on DOE F 4200.33, "Procurement Request
          Authorization") or such other individual(s) as designated by the
          cognizant Secretarial officer or Head of Field Element shall bring
          to the attention of the cognizant contracting officer the
          following:  (1) each procurement requiring the application of this
          Order, (2) requirements for flowdown of provisions of this Order
          to any subcontract or subaward, and (3) identification of the
          paragraphs or other portions of this Order with which the awardee,
          or, if different, a subawardee, is to comply.

     i.   Contracting Officers, based on advice received from procurement
          request originators or other designated individuals, shall apply
          applicable provisions of this Order to awards falling within its
          scope.  For awards other than management and operating contracts,
          this shall be by incorporation or reference using explicit
          language in a contractual action, usually bilateral.

8.   BASIC CRITERIA.

     a.   General.

          (1)  Safeguards and security acceptance and validation tests shall
               be developed for each facility to validate functional
               requirements and effectiveness of the safeguards and security
               elements implemented and operating as part of a total system
               and to assure continuing operation as a total system.

          (2)  Safeguards and security acceptance and validation tests shall
               be conducted with the highest regard for the safety and
               health of personnel, protection of the environment,
               protection of Government property, and national security
               interests with consideration to depict a level of realism for
               the test to be representative of the capabilities of the
               Design Basis Threat Policy issued by SA-1.

          (3)  The requirements contained in DOE Orders, Manuals, Site
               Safeguards and Security Plans (SSSPs), safeguards and
               security plans, and other guidance documents will be the
               basis for designing and evaluating the tests, including
               frequency of testing and acceptance criteria.

          (4)  Critical system elements shall be identified for each
               relevant key program element set forth in DOE 5630.11A,
               including Personnel Security, Protection Program Operation,
               Nuclear Materials Control and Accountability, and Information
               Security.  Critical system elements may include safeguards
               and security equipment, procedures, and/or people.  These
               elements shall be tested to verify their continued
               functionability, operability, effectiveness and/or
               performance.

          (5)  Validation testing of safeguards systems shall include
               elements that can detect-in-time-to-prevent (e.g., portal
               monitors and material surveillance procedures) and elements
               that can effectively account for special nuclear material in
               order to provide assurance that safeguards and security
               systems are functioning properly (e.g., physical inventory).
               Testing of some safeguards systems, such as the physical
               inventory, does not necessarily require a specific stand
               alone test, but instead a check and evaluation of accounting
               records, measurements data, and procedures.

          (6)  Testing of elements which are not prone to failure and which
               are not subject to compromise without noticeable tampering,
               such as walls and fences, is not required.

          (7)  At least every 365 days, a performance test encompassing
               critical system elements associated with a comprehensive site
               or facility threat scenario shall be performed to demonstrate
               overall facility safeguards and security system
               effectiveness.  Comprehensive threat scenarios shall be taken
               from facility specific vulnerability assessments.

          (8)  At least every 365 days, after each inoperative or
               ineffective state for safeguards and security equipment, and
               after any equipment repairs, each critical system element
               identified under paragraph 8a(4) and any other critical
               system elements directly integrated/affected by such
               equipment shall be tested through the conduct of
               effectiveness tests.  Effectiveness testing shall cover the
               range of performance parameters required in the facility's
               approved safeguards and security plan, and include the number
               of tests specified in the safeguards and security acceptance
               and validation test program plan and justified in safeguards
               and security acceptance and validation test plans.  These
               tests shall be performed immediately after such repairs,
               inoperative state, or ineffective state.  The overall
               safeguards and security program shall be considered in a
               degraded mode until such testing has confirmed the
               operability of all applicable performance parameters.
               Compensatory measures may be required during such degraded
               modes.

          (9)  Critical system elements shall be evaluated for continuing
               operability through the conduct of operability tests.

     b.   Safeguards and Security Acceptance and Validation Test Program
          Plan.  A documented and formalized safeguards and security
          acceptance and validation test program plan shall be developed for
          each facility and shall be included as part of the approved
          safeguards and security plan.  The purposes of this program plan
          are to document the process and to identify a comprehensive set of
          tests and a frequency of testing which confirm the ability of an
          implemented and operating, critical system element or total system
          to meet requirements contained in DOE safeguards and security
          Orders and Manuals.  The plan shall include the following sections
          as a minimum:

          (1)  Program Description.  A description of the facility's
               safeguards and security acceptance and validation testing
               program shall be provided.  Descriptive elements shall
               include the development, implementation, revision and
               recordkeeping of test plans and the preparation of required
               reports.

          (2)  Program Administration.  A description of organizations and
               positions responsible for developing, implementing, and
               maintaining test plans and submitting reports shall be
               included in this section.

          (3)  Critical System Elements.  The requirements basis consisting
               of critical system elements to be confirmed through testing
               shall be described and listed in this section.

          (4)  Test Documentation Requirements.  A list of test plans and
               test reports shall be included in this section, with a
               reference to each requirement presented in the Critical
               System Elements section.

          (5)  Corrective Action Requirements.  Corrective actions to be
               taken for failures of safeguards and security elements to
               pass test criteria specified as a requirements basis shall be
               described in this section.

          (6)  Resources.  Specialized personnel, equipment, and facilities
               required for development, implementation, revision, and
               archival of the test program shall be identified and
               described in this section.

          (7)  References.  A list of pertinent requirements basis
               documents, standards, procedures, and reports shall be
               included in this section.

     c.   Safeguards and Security Validation Test Plan.  Written test
          plan(s) shall be developed for each facility to validate
          safeguards and security systems and critical elements.  The plan
          shall include the following sections as a minimum:

          (1)  Test Objectives.  Identify and describe the test objectives.

          (2)  Scenario Description(s).  Describe the threat scenarios
               evaluated by the validation tests.  The scenarios may be
               restricted to specific, limited aspects of the safeguards and
               security system - e.g., weapons detection at a Protected Area
               entry point, or many elements of a total system, e.g., a
               Force on Force exercise.

          (3)  Test Methodology and Evaluation Criteria.  State how the
               validation test will be conducted.  List the steps involved
               in the process of planning and execution.  Include a
               description of any statistical models or mathematical
               formulas used to determine probabilities and confidence
               levels, the number of tests to be performed under each
               scenario to be tested, and pass/fail criteria.  Also, models,
               equations, or methods to be used for data analysis shall be
               presented and discussed in detail.  For tests validating
               effectiveness of equipment, provisions for recording
               calibration settings and equipment configurations shall be
               described.

          (4)  Test Controls.  Identify those controls to be imposed to
               maintain the integrity of the test, yet minimize safety and
               security risks.  Controls apply to people, procedures, and
               equipment characteristics - e.g., use of trusted agents,
               providing minimum notice of test, controlling lighting
               levels, or testing equipment under specific temperature and
               humidity environmental conditions.

          (5)  Resource Requirements.  List resources that are needed to
               effectively conduct the test, including facilities,
               personnel, and equipment.

          (6)  Test Coordination Requirements.  Identify operational and
               support elements - such as, facility operations, safety,
               quality assurance, and safeguards and security management,
               where coordination is necessary.

          (7)  Operational Impact(s) of Testing Program.  Describe the
               operational impacts, if any, that will result from conducting
               the test - e.g., facility production rates and overtime
               costs.

          (8)  Compensatory Measures (if necessary).  Identify measures that
               are necessary to compensate for any degradation of safeguards
               and security readiness experienced while conducting the
               validation test.  Also, identify measures to be implemented
               in the event of test failures.  Reference to existing,
               approved procedures for compensatory measures is acceptable.

          (9)  Coordination and Approval Process.  Describe the approval and
               signoff process for test records and reports, including
               provision for witness initials, dates of data collection, and
               use of compensatory measures.

          (10) References.  Applicable DOE Orders and Manuals, SSSPs,
               Safeguards and Security plans, and other DOE policy related
               documents containing requirements for the element or system
               being validated shall be included in a list of references.
               Also, any other reference material used in analysis,
               calculations, or discussion in this test plan or the
               associated test report shall be included in this list.  For
               each reference, applicable sections and/or paragraph numbers
               shall be included.

     d.   Safeguards and Security Acceptance and Validation Test Reports.
          Test results shall be documented in test reports, which shall
          include the following sections as a minimum:

          (1)  Objectives.  A restatement of test objectives from the
               associated test plan shall be included to permit a basic
               understanding of the data collected and significance of the
               conclusions and recommendations.

          (2)  Test Data.  Recorded test data shall be provided, including
               test forms and data sheets with original signoffs and
               handwritten notes.  Test data, signoffs, and dates beside
               each signoff shall be recorded in pen and ink.

          (3)  Data Analysis.  Analysis of the test data shall be
               documented, using models, equations, or methodology presented
               in the associated test plan.

          (4)  Test Results and Recommendations.  A statement of success or
               failure according to evaluation criteria provided in the test
               plan shall be included.  Also, any unusual observations
               related to the area tested, but not otherwise addressed in
               the associated test plan, shall be discussed.
               Recommendations shall be included for any variations from
               expected test results.

          (5)  Corrective Actions.  Corrective actions recommended for
               safeguards and security measures failing to meet requirements
               shall be listed and discussed.  The persons, organizations,
               or groups responsible for the corrective actions should be
               identified.  Both immediate and longer range solutions will
               be discussed.

          (6)  References.  The related test plan and other pertinent
               references included in the test plan shall be listed.

     e.   Test Documentation Retention.  Safeguards and security acceptance
          and validation test program plans, safeguards and security
          acceptance and validation test plans, and safeguards and security
          acceptance and validation test reports shall be maintained as
          follows:

          (1)  Recordkeeping systems shall be capable of providing an audit
               trail which clearly shows the relationship between all test
               data and test documentation.

          (2)  Test documentation shall be retained according to DOE
               1324.2A, RECORDS DISPOSITION, or as provided by law or
               contract.

     f.   Unsatisfactory Results.  Unsatisfactory results are determined
          from criteria specified in a safeguards and security validation
          test plan.  The possibility of unpredictable test results which
          may not be categorized as pass or fail is recognized and addressed
          in the Test Results and Recommendations section of the safeguards
          and security acceptance and validation test report.
          Unsatisfactory results of a test may be cause to alter or suspend
          program operations protected by inadequate safeguards and security
          measures, if national security and/or the health and safety of
          facility employees or the public is jeopardized.

          (1)  A decision to suspend operations is the responsibility of the
               cognizant Head of Field Element or the cognizant Secretarial
               Officer.

          (2)  The significance of the programmatic impact that would occur,
               compensatory measures which have been, or can be,
               implemented, previous test results, other inspection
               findings, and potential as well as the immediacy of the risk
               to national security and the health and safety of the
               employees or the public will be the basis for a decision to
               suspend operations.

9.   IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE.  Plans for full implementation of the
     requirements of DOE 5630.16 were required to be approved by Heads of
     Field Elements not later than 4-16-93.  Plans shall be based on the
     status of existing compliance with this Order and shall include the
     timeframe for incremental and full implementation of those requirements
     not currently met.  Copies of approved plans shall be submitted to the
     cognizant Secretarial Officer and SA-10.

10.  ASSISTANCE.  Questions concerning this Order should be directed to
     Chief, Physical Security Branch, Telephone 301-903-4244.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY:



                                        LINDA G. SYE
                                        Acting Director of Administration
                                          and Management



REFERENCES 1. DOE 1324.2A, RECORDS DISPOSITION, of 9-13-88, which provides standards for the orderly disposition of records. 2. DOE 1360.2B, UNCLASSIFIED COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM, of 5-18-92, which establishes requirements, policies, and responsibilities for developing, implementing, and sustaining a DOE unclassified computer security program. 3. DOE 5000.3B, OCCURRENCE REPORTING AND PROCESSING OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION, of 1-19-93, which establishes a system for reporting of operations information related to DOE-owned or operated facilities and processing of that information to provide for appropriate corrective action. 4. DOE 5300.2D, TELECOMMUNICATIONS: EMISSION SECURITY (TEMPEST), of 5-18-92, which establishes emission security (TEMPEST) policy and program for automated information and telecommunications information processing equipment pursuant to national program requirements. 5. DOE 5300.3C, TELECOMMUNICATIONS: COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, of 5-18-92, which establishes policy, responsibilities, and guidance concerning the communications security (COMSEC) aspects of the telecommunications services of the Department, and implements national policy on telecommunications and automated information systems security. 6. DOE 5480.16, FIREARMS SAFETY, of 1-12-88, which provides standards and procedures for the safe use of firearms. 7. DOE 5480.19, CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR DOE FACILITIES, of 7-9-90, which provides operational Departmental policy for use in developing orders, plans, and/or procedures related to the conduct of operations and facilities. 8. DOE 5630.11A, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY PROGRAM, of 12-7-92, which serves as the general policy document for the DOE Safeguards and Security Program, and contains applicable references. 9. DOE 5630.12A, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY INSPECTION AND EVALUATION PROGRAM, of 6-23-92, which serves as the general policy document for the DOE Safeguards and Security Inspection and Evaluation Program, and contains applicable references. 10. DOE 5630.13A, MASTER SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS, of 6-8-92, which establishes Departmental policy for developing master safeguards and security agreements. 11. DOE 5630.14A, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY PROGRAM PLANNING, of 6-9-92, which establishes a standardized approach to protection program planning, and prescribes DOE policy, objectives, responsibilities and authorities for the planning process. 12. DOE 5632.1B, PROTECTION PROGRAM OPERATIONS, of 9-8-92, which establishes policy, responsibilities, and authorities for the physical protection of security interests, and contains applicable references and definitions. 13. DOE 5632.2A, PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND VITAL EQUIPMENT, of 2-9-88, which establishes Departmental policy for the physical protection of special nuclear materials. 14. DOE 5632.5, PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED MATTER, of 2-3-88, which establishes Departmental policy for the physical protection of classified matter. 15. DOE 5632.6, PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF DOE PROPERTY AND UNCLASSIFIED FACILITIES, of 2-9-88, which establishes Departmental policy for the physical protection of DOE property and unclassified facilities. 16. DOE 5632.7, PROTECTIVE FORCES, of 2-9-88, which prescribes Departmental policy for the management, operation, and training of protective forces responsible for protecting security interests at DOE facilities. 17. DOE 5632.8, PROTECTION PROGRAM OPERATIONS: SYSTEM PERFORMANCE TESTS, of 2-4-88, which establishes requirements for the evaluation of protection system capabilities. 18. DOE 5633.3A, CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, of 2-12-93, which prescribes Departmental policies and responsibilities for control and accountability of nuclear materials. 19. DOE 5634.1B, FACILITY APPROVALS, SECURITY SURVEYS, AND NUCLEAR MATERIALS SURVEYS, of 9-15-92, which establishes requirements for granting, maintaining and terminating facility activity approvals and conducting onsite inspections of facilities with safeguards and security activities. 20. DOE 5639.8, SECURITY OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITIES, of 9-15-92, which establishes responsibilities and authorities for the protection of Foreign Intelligence Information and Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities within DOE. 21. DOE 5650.2B, IDENTIFICATION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, of 12-31-91, which prescribes Departmental policies for classification of information. 22. DOE 5650.3A, IDENTIFICATION OF UNCLASSIFIED CONTROLLED NUCLEAR INFORMATION, of 6-8-92, which prescribes Departmental policies for designation of unclassified controlled nuclear information. 23. DOE 5700.6C, QUALITY ASSURANCE, of 8-21-91, which provides standards and procedures for quality assurance. 24. DOE 6430.1A, GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA, of 4-6-89, which provides design criteria for use in the acquisition of the Department's facilities. 25. Title 48, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 46, "Quality Assurance," which provides criteria for addressing acceptance testing elements in procurement specifications. 26. Federal Environmental Inspections Handbook, of 10-91, by the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Guidance (EH-231), which provides environmental considerations in testing. DEFINITIONS 1. COVERED CONTRACTOR. A covered contractor is a seller of supplies or services involving access to and protection of classified matter, nuclear materials, or other safeguards and security interests under a procurement contract or subcontract. 2. CRITICAL SYSTEM ELEMENT. A component of a larger system which directly affects the ability of that system to perform a required function. Critical system elements may include safeguards and security equipment, procedures, and/or people. 3. EFFECTIVENESS TEST. A test to confirm that a critical system element is operating as required and can effectively perform a specified function. For example, in a balanced magnetic switch, an effectiveness test for intrusion detection would confirm that a 1 inch or more separation of the switch mounted on the door frame from the magnet mounted on the door resulted in an alarm. 4. FACILITY. An educational institution, manufacturing plant, laboratory, office building, or complex of buildings located on the same site that is operated and protected as one unit by the Department or its contractor(s). 5. OPERABILITY TEST. A test to confirm that a critical system element or total system is operating. For a balanced magnetic switch, an operability test would confirm that opening the door for entry or exit resulted in an alarm. 6. PERFORMANCE TEST. A test to confirm the ability of an implemented and operating, critical system element or total system to meet an established requirement of protection against an adversary. 7. VALIDATION. The confirmation by testing that an implemented, operational system or critical system element meets established requirements.